Who cares if she did in all honesty, her stance was known always to be politically neutral and focusing on her own life and career.
0
Anonymous2w
People seem to think Dolly is some God, but her net worth was over half a billion dollars, and she didn’t pay for all those Imagination Library Books, most of that money came from donors
0
Anonymous#22w
I wouldn't say she was politically neutral whatsoever
3
Anonymous#32w
She’s literally stated as such many times fam. Literally declining Medals of Freedom and refusing to endorse politicians for years on end. Her political life was private to her apart from support of LGBT communities and her own support for literacy.
1
Anonymous#22w
Supporting literacy, LGBT rights, underserved Black communities, and families affected by natural disasters the government are neglecting are all political.
3
Anonymous#32w
Not really, they’re common sense made to be politically charged.
You don’t have to side with any political group to serve your community. Though you might be more likely to support one party doing so.
0
Anonymous#22w
One party very clearly does not support any of those things in this country and has actively attempted to dismantle organizations addressing them, including Dolly's.
3
Anonymous#22w
The Republican Party uses anti LGBT stances as a cornerstone of their ideology.
5
Anonymous#32w
Like I said, politically charged.
She set up organizations to help because she wanted to help and felt connected to such a community. This wasn’t based on politics but her own personal experience.
“Daddy was a Republican, Momma was a Democrat, I’m an entertainer.”
0
Anonymous#22w
Take it up with Howard Zinn and other scholars lmao