Anonymous #5 14w

yeah!!! why cant women just do what i want all the time instead??? stupid ass

120

Anonymous #6 14w

What??

198

Anonymous #6 14w

I was more thinking, as a woman, this album cover sucks cause it’s dehumanizing

755

Maybe you too bud, obviously didn’t even think to think what I was saying with my comment and then made a comment that makes no sense

75

Anonymous #8 14w

Exactly

64

Anonymous #8 14w

in fact i think it's making it so much worse. they're literally fueling the porn industry when it's so exploitative as it is

156

If you want proof I can tell you all about the blood in my toilet rn

90

Anonymous #8 14w

do you genuinely, unironically, actually think that sabrina carpenter and people like her is the reason the porn industry is as exploitative as it is? the most porn addicted people are the ones least exposed to healthy sexual expression.

13

it should be for yourself, but they shouldn't be advocating for women to go into this

20

Sexual reclamation would be seeing women as human who have sex, not as sex objects like this

107

Anonymous #8 14w

where is Sabrina Carpenter saying "oh yeah you should do this"?

-9

Anonymous #6 14w

But I just know there will be guys saying “she’s doing it, why don’t more women do this for us huh”

50

Anonymous #10 14w

Also reclamation only works when you truly reclaim power from a preexisting imbalance. Simply reproducing images that cater to desire and labeling it as empowering isn’t reclaiming anything at all.

70

Anonymous #5 14w

women aren't responsible for male responses. you're shifting the blame onto the wrong group.

47

It’s because historically women have been expected to be subservient and been used like cattle?? And this is perpetuating it?? This is like saying if someone chose to jump off a building it’s their choice and that makes it good. Obvi not, just cause she’s choosing it doesn’t mean it’s not harmful

66

you are very angry for no reason lmao. sabrina isn't explicitly saying it no, but she is a huge celebrity with a big fan base. while people are responsible for their own decisions her words and actions matter a lot since she's a celebrity so she should be cognizant that she's not reinforcing something that can be potentially harmful to young women. i'm taking a women's and gender studies class on this right now and we learned this is what happens as a result of this, sad but true

39

Anonymous #10 14w

No one has the right to censor anything, but at the very least be responsible with your actions when the aftermath can affect a lot of people who are already suffering from prejudice and sexualization — especially young girls, who are more susceptible to that kind of sexualization.

48

Anonymous #5 14w

how is this perpetuating it? have you listened to her music at all??? sexual reclamation isn't just "women in dominant roles" its women CHOOSING to be in the roles they want to be in, which includes this.

33

Anonymous #10 14w

FUCKING THANK YOU she's doing more harm than good

27

Anonymous #10 14w

Beautifully worded!

13

Anonymous #6 14w

Babes she can be submissive if she wants. But submissive people are still human, not a toy. This is dehumanizing

52

Anonymous #8 14w

again she isn't responsible for this behavior that you're saying is reciprocal. again, women are not responsible for the actions and responses of men. saying "women shouldn't sexualize themselves like this" sets the precedent that women should be subverted against sexualization, that it is something wrong and that the proper, moral action would be to be more appropriate. but you don't regulate men who act in the same way because again, you're blaming women for the objectification in our culture.

10

Anonymous #5 14w

LMAO how does this make her a toy??? you're reaching SO hard rn

9

Anonymous #11 14w

disgusting as hell honestly. i personally don't think sabrina is empowering at all, all she does is sexualize herself and encourages her fans to do the same when in reality it's not empowering it all, basically what #10 said

31

Anonymous #6 14w

you can argue with my professor who has a phd if you want babe idk what you want me to tell you

10

be fr ofc i'm gonna believe a person who put their entire lives into being an expert on this over some dumbass on yikyak💀💀do yall bitches think you're poseidon or some shit deadass

-5

Anonymous #8 14w

i view the album art as the reclamation of women’s sexuality, but i also see where you’re coming from with displaying harmful rhetorics. it’s definitely a grey area for sure, because of the harm it can do

23

Anonymous #4 14w

she looks like alfred e neuman

74

How?

48

Anonymous #6 14w

I think #6 here is trying to be sarcastic guys, why downvote…

17

Anonymous #16 14w

but now that i’m thinking about it more i think it’s a grey area between that and creating harmful rhetorics

55

Anonymous #8 14w

but what if she was abused in the past? that would explain sexualizing herself, but she also could just be secure in her sexuality

-16

Anonymous blucandi 14w

that makes it so much worse then

29

Anonymous #6 14w

the decay of society starts with the individual

-4

sexual reclamation is another way of self objectification

-17

Anonymous #10 14w

how do you suggest women fully reclaim power in this society?

1

Anonymous #19 14w

would you say this to survivors of abuse?

10

Anonymous #19 14w

self objectification isn't possible. you can choose to put yourself in a role, but ultimately that role is only objectifying because of outward perception and that perceiver is the one responsible for it being wrong.

16

Anonymous #15 14w

What, me worry?

16

Anonymous blucandi 14w

see i don't think its that much of a gray area because ultimately anyone who would fall into the theoretically possible "harm" this would cause would only be to that point by a harmful, sexist society that wouldn't necessarily be worsened by this, and, at the end of the day, Sabrina is not responsible for these people.

5

Anonymous #19 14w

this so-called "decay of society" doesn't really exist. anti-modernists always claim that the decay of society is occuring because unnecessary social norms are being pushed but they're literally always wrong.

52

Anonymous #10 14w

the preexisting imbalance does exist tho, acting like it doesn't denies the existence of misogyny. sabrina carpenter choosing to sexualize herself and displaying herself in a sex positive way would not change the hearts of anyone who hasn't already had their hearts changed. i do think people are responsible for their actions, of course, but the only thing that would actually make a real difference towards the destruction of objectification is holding MEN responsible and teaching proper sex ed.

10

Anonymous #6 14w

based

3

Anonymous blucandi 14w

There are many ways to reclaim ‘power’ for women, e.g. in language, in image, through role reversal—but reproducing the same submissive woman trope is not claiming ‘power’ but simply self-justifying act of strengthening preexisting male dominance. Ofc there’s a degree of agency in producing the image itself by women, but that’s a more like coping mechanism

10

Anonymous #10 14w

For analogy, It’s like performing a mockery of power imbalance while in fact reinstating yourself within the same hierarchy, a self-congratulatory form of so-called reclamation.

8

Anonymous #10 14w

it’s empowering because she is in control of the situation. it’s consensual. the man may appear to be in control, but in reality she can say the word to make him stop

-6

Anonymous #10 14w

how does trying to regulate how she expresses herself not actually strengthen preexisting male dominance? shame is the driving force that which power is fueled into the patriarchy, men and women alike. continuing that cycle of shame isn't actually promoting sex positivity. there is nothing that separates a dominant woman expressing sexuality and a submissive woman expressing sexuality.

2

Anonymous #20 14w

found it

408

Anonymous #6 14w

Given how exploitative the music industry is, it’s naive to believe that this expression is entirely her own. Also it’s not about shame, the issue is the repeated reproduction of the same old trope and that’s just lame

5

Anonymous #15 14w

💀💀💀 these youngins don’t know bout Alfred E Neuman

134

Anonymous #10 14w

actually that's not the issue, the issue is that you think she should have shame and not express herself in this way. now if she didn't choose this, ofc there's an issue, but im not gonna assume that there was without evidence.

-3

Anonymous #6 14w

you want women to feel shame for being comfortable with their sexualities? like just say you support the patriarchy

-1

Anonymous #2 14w

It HAS. Peep the rest of the comments lol

297

Anonymous #21 14w

wait how old are you

22

Anonymous #6 14w

I mean, not really. All that would happen is men have easier access to what they want if women put themselves into this role of dehumanized sex thing

2

Anonymous #15 14w

Im 24 but #20 was saying they didn’t know who he was

7

Anonymous #21 14w

thats his catchphrase....

24

Anonymous #6 14w

It’s not that she should feel shame. She shouldn’t. It’s the fact that women are forced into this kinda thing and have been for like ever and this seems to be a mockery of that

7

Anonymous #5 14w

but it really isn't a mockery of that. its a reclaiming of it. whats mocking about it?

1

Anonymous blucandi 14w

As someone who is a survivor of sexual abuse, I did used to act this way as a way to “reclaim my sexuality”. All it really did was give men more access to use and abuse me

21

Anonymous #5 14w

And guys will always be like that. That’s like saying lesbians are contributing to the porn industry by engaging in something that men find attractive. Believe it or not she’s not responsible for the sins of men.

10

Anonymous #6 14w

Dude she is literally calling herself a dog. “Man’s best friend” is dogs and the position she is in is for a dog. That is dehumanizing. “Oh but this woman is agreeing to being dehumanized” and that makes it better??? When it gives into super harmful stereotypes and dehumanizes not just her but women in general??? Yeah this is a part of the problem. The men feeding on it is also a problem of course.

14

Anonymous #5 14w

Also, the name of the album is Man’s best friend which most people would say is a dog men historically are said to be dogs. They only want sex, so this will be flipping the narrative kinda to herself into the dog, which would be on some level, putting her in the place of a man. It’s saying men aren’t the only ones with sexual desires. But by all means, don’t buy the album if you don’t want to.

11

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

she's not agreeing to be dehumanized and you're only perceiving it as dehumanizing. YOURE the one dehumanizing her.

8

Anonymous #5 14w

that doesn’t sound like you were reclaiming your sexuality. it sounds like people were still taking advantage of you. perhaps you mistook reclaiming sexuality for hypersexuality? i’ve experienced that before, and ill still working on myself due to it

-2

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

She’s not agreeing to be dehumanized. She’s making a statement on sex and power dynamics challenging, social norms, and purposely making some people uncomfortable and turned on

10

Anonymous #8 14w

i disagree. i still see it as empowerment

-3

Anonymous #6 14w

But she is literally placing herself as an animal, calling herself man’s best friend, how we refer to animals

7

Anonymous #15 14w

Let’s not try to degrade or judge a woman’s looks on here.

57

Anonymous #24 14w

saying that dogs only want sex denies their biological want for love from humans

1

Anonymous blucandi 14w

And how is this cover art not an example of hyper sexuality?

11

Anonymous #5 14w

okay and? do you think someone could go up to her and do what they want to her and use this as an excuse? "you dehumanized yourself therefore i can treat you as something not human" do you see how ignorant that is? you feasibly cannot dehumanize yourself in an actual moral sense because it would require you to make the choice to dehumanize yourself, which choice and logical conclusions are an inherently human phenomenon.

5

Anonymous blucandi 14w

If you don’t like it change society’s view then

2

Anonymous blucandi 14w

I’m sorry you’ve also experienced that before though, something that no one should have to go through 🫶

8

Anonymous #5 14w

its literally just sexual. hypersexuality is a specifically documented psychological phenomenon. this is just sexual.

7

Anonymous #5 14w

because we don’t know her experiences. i’ve never heard her straight up say she’s been abused

0

Anonymous #5 14w

and hypersexuality is only the result of sexual abuse

-8

Anonymous #6 14w

So then what is she even reclaiming?

5

Anonymous #5 14w

her sexuality due to bigotry and misogyny

0

Anonymous blucandi 14w

False hypersexuality is not that dependent on abuse

6

Anonymous #24 14w

you’re right, my mistake

5

Anonymous blucandi 14w

So she’s battling bigotry and misogyny, by being what bigots and misogynists want?

9

Anonymous #6 14w

… dehumanize means removing from human, acting like a dog or comparing yourself to a dog is actively dehumanizing. There is no other way of classifying it. I’m not even mentioning the sexual coding of it or the man gripping her hair. A dog is not human hence dehumanizing.

13

Anonymous #26 14w

Same. Makes me sad that women are often forced directly or indirectly into showing this kind of image of themselves

19

Anonymous #8 14w

You might not be empowered others may be empowerment is subjective to the person who feels power

2

Anonymous #5 14w

wish everyone would fight back on this “sex sells” bs instead of conforming to it. sad thing is once you conform, anything you do after that’s opposite of sexualizing does not get nearly as many views/support

19

Anonymous #26 14w

I hate that people feel the need to comment on her life choices so much. People got freedom of expression tho ig

7

Anonymous #6 14w

Kink and sexual expression especially when coping is fine, that’s up to the individual, but her whole image is hypersexualization. It’s lingerie, sex positions on stage, it’s bleach blonde wigs, and sex lyrics. She also isn’t really a girls girl from her own songs. Her expressions of sexuality is the classic male view of women. There are plenty of examples of women’s sexual expression that aren’t hypersexualized and are positive (not harmful or giving into harmful stereotypes).

1

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

But dehumanizing isn’t always derogatory. Furrys for example want to be dehumanized that does not mean they want to be treated as less than.

11

Anonymous #6 14w

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, BDSM isn’t something to monetize. It’s something that HAS to exist within a trusting relationship with clear consent and boundaries and when it’s advertised like this (meaning removed from its context of trust and consent) it’s harmful. The studies about demonstrating BDSM outside of their proper relationships and context are constantly showing it increases the abuse of women. Both general violence and sexual.

8

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

that's actually not what dehumanization means. Dehumanization is to deprive of POSITIVE human qualities. the positive is incredibly important. if i'm a furry and i dress up as a dog, i'm not dehumanizing myself. but, if someone comes up to me and says, "because you're dressed up as a dog, i get to treat you like you are one by taking away your sense of logic and understanding and consent", that is the point of dehumanization.

-1

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

You can argue with it if you want, it’s just the reality about how these things affect the people around them. I would prefer if we could be sexually expressive in all ways without harmful drawbacks but that’s not the world we live in.

2

Anonymous #6 14w

So dressing up like a dog for a Halloween costume or the furry community is very very different than comparing yourself to be a dog in a sexual manner. It’s subservient in nature. Literally part of the kink is intentionally dehumanizing. All of pet play in sex is active dehumanization. When it is consensual in a relationship and protected, that’s fine (like the other person said, dehumanization isn’t inherently always bad), BUT when it’s so open ended to the public it has bad repercussions.

3

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

yeah but regulating people who aren't actually attributing to the issue in any observable way isn't gonna help. doing this in the name of utilitarianism and harm reduction and then proceeding to set the precedent that we should shame women who act like this, which causes more harm, isn't logically consistent. if you want to actually make a difference, advocate for sex ed and sex positivity.

0

Anonymous #6 14w

Men shouldn’t get the benefit of a trusting consensual BDSM relationship when they are doing absolutely nothing and there is no proper context of consent and communication. Removing BDSM from its context is just abuse.

6

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

Most things can have bad repercussions. Most things have positive repercussions too. Things can exist in duality. Because of that album cover more women might feel comfortable expressing that side of themselves at the same time women might want to imitate that and end up doing things they aren’t actually comfortable with.

1

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

do you genuinely unironically think she is assuming the role of someone who is being harmed by bdsm when making this album cover?

-2

Anonymous #6 14w

I am saying this as someone who 1. Has been sexually abused. 2. Experiences hypersexuality. & 3. Is deeply involved in BDSM

6

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

yeah but do you think that? do you think she's assuming the role of someone who is in an non consensual relationship in this image?

-2

Anonymous #24 14w

That’s the societal slice of it. It’s purpose is to spark these discussions and to challenge a narrative make people think critically for the marketing perspective It’s ingenious It’s making people talk about the album. It’s making the album relevant.

2

Anonymous #6 14w

If you are wearing a collar and chain in public as a woman, go for it. Because if someone crosses the line with you or takes that as an invitation to yank on your chain (literally) you can deck them or kick them. Hence active consequence for the misuse of her sexual expression. The same does not apply online with things like this.

-2

Anonymous #6 14w

Key word is “unnecessary”. Nothing about this is necessary

8

Anonymous #6 14w

Sub and Dom relationships have to exist within their context to not be harmful

1

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

okay but yes or no question do you think she is assuming the role of someone unconsenting in this cover art?

0

Anonymous #28 14w

Nothing about anything is necessary if you wanna get philosophical on it

18

Anonymous #24 14w

That is not an argument. Try again

7

Anonymous #24 14w

I don’t wanna get “philosophical.”

0

Anonymous #28 14w

i'm sure they thought that the last other fifty thousand anti modernist movements that have existed

3

Anonymous #6 14w

It’s not anti modernist.

0

Anonymous #28 14w

They don’t get philological by saying nothing about it is necessary define necessary it’s not necessary for her to be an artist, but she is. It’s not necessary for you to comment your opinion, but you do.

4

Anonymous #28 14w

actually they were making an anti modernist statement. "this individual is making modern sentiments that contribute to the decay of society" that is anti modernist like textbook jordan peterson types

8

Anonymous #6 14w

That’s not what I said. What you put in quotes you came up with by yourself.

-3

Anonymous #28 14w

It’s actually what some else said and you decided to join the conversation

6

Anonymous #28 14w

yeah its what #19 said, which is why i make a point against anti modernism, which is where you made a point against mine that was in line with anti modernist sentiments and then you claimed to not be an anti modernist. but if you're gonna make the claim where regulating these modern sentiments around sex positivity is necessary, elaborate on it. prove it.

3

Anonymous #6 14w

Saying BDSM in public is unnecessary isn’t anti modernist.

6

Anonymous #24 14w

So… what? What’s your point? You guys don’t even know what you’re arguing for.

0

Anonymous #6 14w

Your comments don’t load until I reload the page, I wasn’t ignoring your question. When I’m saying “removing context” I’m not saying I believe she isn’t consenting to her photo being taken like this, I’m saying that the context of BDSM that she is expressing always has to have context of proper BDSM education. Monetizing it and using it like this is harmful. She most likely doesn’t know or understand how or why it’s harmful, but that doesn’t change that it is.

3

Anonymous #28 14w

in public? this is an album cover intended for adults lmao not broad street. you're trying to regulate human expression

6

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

is it really monetizing it? to me, it's individual expression. if i watched a movie with bdsm in it displayed in a healthy way, i don't see the movie as monetizing it, i see it as a form of expression.

-1

Anonymous #28 14w

My point is what is necessary define necessary since you think necessary is important in this conversation define what is necessary

6

Anonymous #6 14w

The album is public, don’t try to argue It’s not anyone can buy this album cover. It’s widely available online. It’s available to the general public. You’re not gonna get ID checked before you see this album.

11

Anonymous #24 14w

Well could I just ask what would make it necessary to begin with? In my mind anything behind closed doors is fair game. MOST things outside of closed doors is fair game. But doing something to “speak for” a demographic and provide potentially harmful rhetoric doesn’t seem “necessary” to an individuals self expression

3

Anonymous #6 14w

When you are famous, things you are posting and releasing aren’t just about you and your personal relationships anymore. This isn’t her privately deciding to engage in BDSM. And I say this exact same thing about men monetizing BDSM and removing it from its context.

3

Anonymous #28 14w

Why does it have to be necessary? And something that would make it necessary is it’s good for sells because it keeps on people’s mind and makes it culturally relevant. Therefore, you’re gonna turn a bigger profit.

3

Anonymous #8 14w

No it’s just that you aren’t empowered by it. There can be overlap between expressing yourself in a way that specifically caters to the male gaze and expressing yourself the way you want. It’s also not empowering to only live in opposition to it. This photo is not about selling your tits to men, it’s about the position she’s chosen to put herself in.

0

Anonymous #24 14w

i don't think you understand what public means. one, it is the parents responsibility to regulate what their kid consumes, not the creators. two, just because its available doesn't mean its public. Anora shows titties and sex scenes, doesn't mean that we should shame the creators for creating it on that premise. we regulate pornographic content, but this isn't pornographic, she isn't even close to naked. fucking Enema of the State is more provocative than this.

7

fucking exactly omg

0

Yes, however what percent of straight men or men attracted to women are actively contributing to her revenue stream. Because if we’re doing an algorithm thing, then I guess we’re all buying her content and the argument of sex sells is irrelevant if it’s an algorithm thing.

4

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

you're essentially implying that she has less of a right to self expression because she's famous and influential. it is her prerogative to chose whether or not she wants to express that part of herself publicly, and if you want people to perceive it properly, advocate for better sex ed and sex positivity, because ultimately the precedent that this should be shamed is much more harmful.

1

Anonymous #6 14w

This isn’t just art, it’s not just one small thing, it’s much bigger than that. The problem is much bigger than her. It’s like if someone famous makes an album cover of gay person that prays the gay away with songs that could go either way about if they are saying they personally tried and failed or that they actually believe that works. It’s harmful rhetoric that contributes to a bigger picture. If intentions aren’t clear, it’s a negative, doing more harm than good.

2

Also, sex sells is a separate matter than the male gaze, but they are connected. Sex sells applies to anyone sexually attracted to the content. I know a lot of girls who think Sabrina’s hot and they’re gonna buy her shit because she’s hot. They’re also gonna buy it because she’s talented.

3

Anonymous #6 14w

The whole point I’m making is displaying it in a healthy way AND THIS ISNT IT that’s literally the whole point

3

Anonymous #34 14w

For real, she’s young and wildly successful and confident in her body

-1

Anonymous #24 14w

I was more referring to the fact that she relentlessly sexualizes herself, and as someone who is successful, young women will see this as a good or normal thing

14

Anonymous #6 14w

I constantly advocate for better sex Ed and sex positivity in the way that we can discuss it openly where people are free from judgement about who or how they do it, but that doesn’t mean I have to support all kinds of sexual expression when I know they are actively involved in harmful rhetoric.

3

Anonymous #34 14w

Then I guess it’s a good and normal thing because those are things decided by society good and normal are societal concepts

0

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

yeah but you're making a false equivalence. this doesn't impose or degrade any one group directly. anyone who would otherwise harm someone wouldn't be pushed to harm by this album alone. we can't just regulate every single person's expression because it may minorly contribute to someone's wrongful sentiments held around something. if we do, than the low cut blouse the barista wears that might sexually frustrate a person should be discouraged. and that falls into the slippery slope.

1

Anonymous #35 14w

And that man was on Sabrina‘s dime during this photo. He was a paid person. He’s an employee. She’s the boss.

2

Anonymous #6 14w

Being influential and having that power IS a responsibility. When your whole job is influencing others, you actively have to be more cautious about your actions. You have to know your audience and authority with them. Like you don’t talk to and express yourself the same way to kids that you would an adult, you have to be careful about how to talk around them like not to curse, because influence matters.

3

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

of course its a responsibility, but you have yet to have proven how this is negative outside of maybe the already held sentiments by bigots

-1

Anonymous #6 14w

In the same way people with more money are held to a higher standard where they should be using it to help people, the same goes with all kinds of power including influence.

3

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

Yes, but she’s not gonna treat her fans like kids.

1

Anonymous #24 14w

but i’m talking about the fucking picture

14

Anonymous #35 14w

I am too

3

Anonymous #35 14w

well unfortunately for you i think its hot and empowering! turns out we're at a crossroads then ☹️

5

Anonymous #6 14w

These things have to start somewhere though. Recognizing the harm things like this does and starting with smaller instances is how you get progress done. People aren’t ready to remove more extreme versions of this kind of thing.

3

Anonymous #24 14w

i know she paid him to be there fool i’m saying that the picture makes it look like she’s being subservient to men. it’s the meaning behind the photo. not the process of taking the photo.

11

Anonymous #6 14w

well maybe you need to stand up for yourself then girl.. if ur letting men treat u like that

2

Anonymous #35 14w

but if you use critical thinking skills you’d see that she’s the one in control

9

Anonymous #35 14w

The meaning behind the photo could also be a strong woman can pay a man and let him look like he’s in control because she’s confident in her power and she knows if she wants to she can kick him out of her life power is an illusion

2

Anonymous #35 14w

actually i'm making my man treat me like that. i'm the one into it. its my choice. 😝

7

Anonymous #6 14w

BASED

8

Anonymous #35 14w

Why didn’t you think she wanted to be the man in that photo and Dom the fuck out of Sabrina?

4

Anonymous #6 14w

Is me talking about it online going to change anything about it? No. The album will be released and no way is she going to change her mind about it. But I also believe it’s important to discuss how women’s submission and sexual expression for men being so normalized and expected actively contributes to why men feel so entitled to your bodies, submission, and sex. These things don’t exist inside a vacuum and so if we want to be sexually expressive (especially submissive) then we have to do it in

3

Anonymous #24 14w

okay so if she wanted to give the message of a powerful woman why didn’t she have him on the ground? you’re reaching!! i get that you have to defend your fav and stuff but like i’m allowed to feel how i feel about the picture!!

5

Anonymous #6 14w

Proper context as to avoid it being misinterpreted or misused.

3

Anonymous #6 14w

It’s genuinely a part of rape culture. A much smaller part than others but definitely still a part.

3

Anonymous #35 14w

She’s not my favorite artist I rarely listen to her music. And you’re absolutely allowed to interpret the photo however you want I’m just letting you know there’s different ways to interpret it.

5

Anonymous #6 14w

ur kink feeds into rape culture and you have to live with that!!

-8

Anonymous #24 14w

okay dope have a good day

-1

Anonymous #35 14w

actually no it does not!!! what feeds into rape culture is regulating sexual expression and shaming women for being sexual!! not this. not me and my man choosing to be submissive or dominant.

1

Anonymous #6 14w

I don’t hate her for this or anything, and I don’t support shaming her for being sexually explicit or her looks or anything, but I do feel like addressing the issue with this is still necessary. I mean nothing malicious towards her or any other women who chooses to indulge or express themselves like this, just to bring to attention how it can be harmful or handled better in the future

5

Anonymous #35 14w

disagree. anything consensual doesn’t feed into rape culture

8

Anonymous #35 14w

Nah you ain’t about to tell someone they feed rape culture

13

when you have that many eyes on you, EVERYTHING you do is a MESSAGE to the public. whether she took this seriously or not is irrelevant, she still has a responsibility with the things she produces for the public. she’s smart enough to know that this would be upsetting for many people it was purposeful.

2

Anonymous #35 14w

No that’s not how that works. Kink itself doesn’t feed into rape culture. There are lots of misconceptions about how BDSM and kink work due to not being taught any of it, but I would suggest you look into BDSM and dynamics for real research to understand more why it’s actually a very helpful and normal human expression

7

Anonymous #35 14w

OK, then be upset. Don’t buy the album. Don’t engage with the artist. Live your tooth, babe. Power to you.

9

Anonymous #6 14w

girl idc if women are sexual but how can you even deny that allowing a man to be physically abusive with you for pleasure fulfills a sick fantasy of abusing women..

5

Anonymous #35 14w

abuse requires a power structure and non-consent. me choosing to have him sexually pleasure me better is not a power structure. hopes this helps!

3

except it is that deep that’s what i’m trying to say. just because you don’t want to take it seriously doesn’t mean i can’t!

-1

I can do both and I actively do. Was literally in a post about sex trafficking like ten minutes ago.

6

Anonymous #6 14w

whatever helps you sleep at night..

-1

Anonymous #6 14w

you’re literally role playing abuse though. so even though it’s not an abusive situation, you’re still roleplaying and fantasizing about ABUSE!! ask yourself why??

-2

Anonymous #35 14w

yeah but im not tho... im roleplaying something i find sexy and stimulating.

2

Unlike most people, I have the time to talk about a lot of things (I’m chronically ill so I’m in bed a lot), so I can put energy into a lot more topics and spend it on more minor things like this. I don’t have a better or more important thing to discuss rn so this is the place I’m at.

7

Anonymous #6 14w

which is abuse. you think abuse is sexy and stimulating. just say that!

-1

Anonymous #35 14w

roleplaying is not abuse!!!! it’s a kink!!!

5

Anonymous #35 14w

like just say you have no fantasies

2

Anonymous #35 14w

do i have to say abuse is inherently nonconsensual or will your brain try just a little bit for once

5

Anonymous #35 14w

Hey, so there is a LOT of psychology that goes into this. Spanking, slapping, whipping, flogging, etc. are all things that are physically stimulating and make your skin much more sensitive to touch. Some people desire intense feelings during sex and that is one way to get them. Pain can also release endorphins and adrenaline which some people find really pleasing.

6

Anonymous #6 14w

so do you think having a rape kink is completely fine as long as it’s hot and consensual??

-3

Anonymous #35 14w

it’s not rape. it’s cnc. use google

3

Anonymous #6 14w

girl i know that what is happening to you is NOT ABUSE BUT THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD. but you ARE role playing having someone put their hands on you violently. which is the definition of physical assault. you’re roleplaying physical assault. whatever word you wanna call it

0

Anonymous #35 14w

yknow what i'll actually take the hard road and say within certain perimeters, yes. of course i wouldn't want anyone to have one, but if they do, CNC has been found to be effective at preventing actual harm and coping with trauma. now obviously actually going out there and raping people is wrong, but again, consent is the most important part of this.

4

Anonymous #6 14w

so you don’t think it’s like wrong to fantasize about raping people or being raped??

-1

Anonymous #35 14w

Now with sub and dom dynamics, there are many different kinds but they all have their own psychological explanations and are positive experiences when done correctly. Being a Dom is about a feeling of control and honestly (imo) the joy of being trusted by someone and bonding so intensely with them. Also it feels great to be able to make someone feel the most intense pleasure of their life, it’s really gratifying.

6

Anonymous #35 14w

so like lets say we're roleplaying and you play the patient and i play the sexy nurse. or we're roleplaying and you play the prisoner and i play the sexy cop. these are sexually exploitative positions without real consent, but in the bedroom, its literally just roleplay. are you against actors displaying abusive roles?

5

Anonymous #35 14w

you act like kink is a choice and you choose the thoughts you have.

4

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

yknow despite our debate earlier i actually really appreciate your knowledge and understanding of this, its refreshing!

3

Anonymous #6 14w

you do have control over your own thoughts tho??

0

Anonymous #35 14w

And on the sub end, psychologically it can be really helpful to give up control to someone else and form that kind of trust. A lot of it follows the same psychology as trust falls and those crazy dance & yoga poses where you have to entirely trust another person with your safety.

2

Anonymous #5 14w

I’m a woman too, and a feminist. I think it might be the point though. I’m hoping her album will be a statement on how men treat and view women

28

Anonymous #35 14w

okay choose to think im right then. you can try to, but ultimately its your thoughts that exist and make the determinations and what you do choose is how you act.

4

Anonymous #35 14w

So with CNC (consensual non consensual) the typical reason for the kink to develop is commonly sexual abuse. Now there are many levels of it like “I just want you to come up to me and have sex with me without asking” to actually roleplaying a violent assault. But there are lots of studies on this and why people like it and if it’s harmful and the conclusion is: when done correctly it’s a positive thing.

6

but it isn’t harmful. if the sub no longer felt comfortable with cnc they can say the safe word to stop

6

Anonymous #35 14w

Reasons why it’s positive: • it gives victims a chance to “redo” their trauma in a safe environment where they ultimately hold the control (subs opinions are the end all be all in BDSM) and helps prevent them from doing self destructive things to cope. Many abuse victims will think they could have handled it differently or done something else to change the outcome and roleplay like this can actually be helpful.

6

Anonymous #6 14w

I think you should pick up a few ancient history books and pay attention to themes in cultural changes just before and as societies collapse and fall

5

Anonymous #35 14w

• some people with low self esteem have a really hard time believing their partner is attracted to them or cares about them so they need aggressive actions to actually feel reassured, like someone screaming at them that they love them type thing, but instead it’s “I’m SO attracted to you that I can’t even control myself and HAVE to have sex with you right now!” Even though that’s not how it works in real life, it’s how some people roleplay!

6

lol my bad, I’ll go save the world rn

8

Anonymous #41 14w

i think you should understand that this isn't true. a lot of people point towards the romans but actually they had very open minds about certain progressive issues during the height of their power and were the most restrictive and oppressive post-Contsantine. There are societies with liberalistic values that collapsed, yes, but there are hundreds of more movements that have only elevated societies rather than bringing about the "end of society" as people claim.

5

Anonymous #35 14w

• some people like feeling helpless to pleasure. Like it feels so good that even though you “don’t want it” (bc obviously this is roleplay and you do want it) that you just have to give in. • similar to pain play, the chemicals released in such a high intensity roleplay some people like. It’s another type of adrenaline junky (if you’ve ever heard that term before).

5

i guarantee you that a lot of people like it. that shit gets so many views on porn websites

-1

it’s not harmful if it’s consensual. if you are harmed from watching consensual sex maybe you shouldn’t watch porn

-1

Anonymous #35 14w

There are many more reasons why people participate and like CNC and the psychology behind why some people find it enjoyable. There are many toxic people who try to use BDSM as an excuse or cover up for abuse but that is not welcome in the actual community and is called out immediately in those circles. There are rules about how to properly handle these things so that everyone is safe and happy.

4

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

mother russia always speaks facts tbh

9

if porn corrupts your mind then don’t watch it.

3

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

that’s actually quite informative. interesting psychology as well. i dont think people who are participating are inherently bad or anything, but i definitely think it represents something problematic and is a result of cycles of abuse. but this has helped me to understand it better so thank you!

5

it’s called kink for a reason… it’s not normal to people not involved with kink. with that logic all kink shouldn’t be put on porn websites

-1

Anonymous #35 14w

I’m glad I could help explain some of it at least! I’ve been in BDSM for a while mainly just out of curiosity but then joined after I found it could help me with a lot of my trauma, so I find the topic to be important to discuss.

6

question, just for curiosities sake, do you think sex tapes are bad? like keeping your own?

1

you’re misunderstanding kink. if there isn’t consent then it’s rape. but it isn’t rape. it’s consensual sex

4

cnc heals people who have been sexually abused. if it wasn’t completely consensual it would not have happened

6

it’s okay to like cnc. it’s not okay to rape

7

Anonymous #6 14w

Emphasis on personal pleasure and gratification shifts focus away from structure, stability and social cohesion. Pointing out that the height of such behavior in the Roman Empire can be observed in their golden era (especially late golden era) only contributes to my point. Later emperors were varied in their policies but more restrictive policies were largely ignored by the populace. A more recent example is Weimar.

4

True but “man’s best friend” is a term to liken her to a dog, and she’s on all fours like a dog, he’s “petting” her like a dog. This is suggesting sexual servitude, which I suppose is fine, but does make me uneasy as a more Dworkinian feminist

11

Anonymous #43 14w

wdym is fine? It’s literally self objectification projecting unto women and teenagers

3

Anonymous #19 14w

self objectification dont exist

0

I would never wanna be treated like that by a man

16

Idk how so many people disagree with you. You're completely right

3

Anonymous #19 14w

Just so you know that’s a literal Nazi catchphrase.

4

Anonymous #47 14w

it is a hard take to understand because misogyny is so engrained in our heads, but all it takes is a little bit of critical thought and a little less ego for people to understand it

3

Anonymous the_9billion_memes_of_god 14w

Shit it did in fact make the people go to war

144

Sorry my husband and I have wonderful sex where we both feel seen, valued, and pleasures. Sorry to hear you haven’t experienced the same

7

Anonymous #46 14w

Really though

8

Anonymous #21 14w

Do people not know what that is anymore?

1

Anonymous #54 14w

seek therapy

12

Anonymous #39 14w

It feels more sexual though, if it’s on par with the rest of her music, it’s probably not “this is wrong” but “this is so fun”

8

Anonymous #6 14w

By advertising how fun it is? Is that not what most of her music is? Which is fun when both participants are of equal power and status. dogs are owned. Women shouldn’t be

2

Anonymous #6 14w

“Man’s best friend” is a dog. ? Not a toy but def a pet

4

Anonymous #29 14w

Of course not I want to be seen as human, not a pet.

17

Anonymous #57 14w

I mean some people are just into that. It’s not uncommon at all for feminist women to have a misogyny kink

-7

Anonymous #58 14w

no but actually everyone going “ermm as a woman ☝️” i’m a woman and i think she looks hot. y’all know women are allowed to have sexual desires right

6

Anonymous #58 14w

What the fuck is going on here?

0

Anonymous blucandi 14w

For finding a woman attractive?

9

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 14w

Perry what are you doing outside of the college chat

88

Anonymous #6 14w

please explain how it’s a reclaiming of it? explain how the image is empowering at all.

6

Anonymous #54 14w

😦

4

Anonymous #8 14w

I think it’s pretty regressive to insist that women should only be allowed to express their sexuality in certain ways and it’s also pretty regressive to tell artists how they can and can’t express themselves

1

Anonymous #5 14w

You’re also acting like this isn’t a kink. You do know what pet play is right?

0

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

Ok so she’s not allowed to enjoy sex and express herself. Seems like a really regressive mindset

4

Anonymous #57 14w

Some people enjoy when that power balance is (consensually of course) “broken”

2

Anonymous #62 14w

I just like Olivia because she makes some actually really good punk music and does tap into some of my heartbreak over the past few years

10

Anonymous #5 14w

I feel that that’s the point 😭

1

Anonymous #5 14w

I think that the cover art is satirizing the oversexualisation of women in our society and especially in media. As is a good amount of Sabrina Carpenters work. That what I pick up from it rather than her purposefully dehumanizing herself and by proxy all women.

15

Anonymous #8 14w

I don’t think it’s necessarily sexualizing herself as a form of reclamation but rather as a satirical commentary on the over sexualization of women

1

Anonymous #6 14w

There is a limit to wokeness and “let them do whatever they want”😭 it’s okay that this is the kinda media Sabrina and her fans like but like just don’t call it progressive cause it’s not

6

Anonymous #67 14w

This is like very low level kink too and everyone is freaking out lmao

13

Anonymous #71 14w

Like??? Literally. God forbid a girl want to engage in a consensual power dynamic.

10

Anonymous #5 14w

PLEASE tell me about this

6

Anonymous #74 14w

About what?

2

Anonymous #58 14w

I do indeed smoke weed. You listen to any music when you light up dawg?

1

Anonymous #68 14w

I am super for satire. However, if it’s not obviously satire, it’s not good satire. The fact that so many people are taking it seriously means it’s not obvious satire

12

Anonymous #42 14w

Since when tho really? Would she not just be a promiscuous performative pop star?

1

Anonymous #5 14w

I think you’re all thinking way too hard about a damn album cover

5

Anonymous #34 14w

So instead you should be teaching to be ashamed of themselves? Great lesson

6

Anonymous #6 14w

Empowering how?

5

Anonymous blucandi 14w

And you’d also know that most people will just see the image

3

Anonymous #43 14w

“I don’t personally agree with it so it’s not empowering” good thing that an empowered person doesn’t have to do what you want them to do

0

Anonymous #39 14w

I think she might be trying to reclaim her sexuality from the male gaze. She may feel empowered by this image. As a woman, I don't feel that way and think this image feeds the negative stereotypes she may be trying to fight, but I support her right to feel empowered by it.

7

Anonymous #8 14w

The awesome part about feminism is that we can disagree about this stuff. There is enough room for both opinions to be true.

4

Anonymous #80 14w

DAYUM. This is a take of all time

5

Anonymous #5 14w

the albums not out yet so yeah it’s not going to be obvious in either direction yet but based on the lead single (manchild) it seems to be satirical. also people are stupid, some people think lolita is a romance i don’t think people not understanding makes it non obvious

12

Anonymous #6 14w

What effect do you think this sort of thing has on young female fans?

7

Anonymous #79 14w

Exactly but I’m so sick and tired of performative feminists attacking other women for disagreeing with what celebrities such as Sabrina and Sydney Sweeny do sometimes. They say it’s us “hating women” “being jealous” and “not feminists”. Like is it wrong to have different opinions 😭 I respect urs and can u please respect mine 😭

4

Anonymous #81 14w

Correct, there are some people out there who have a hard time seeing nuance. However, even the thumbnail for man child has her booty cheeks out. It’s giving Katy Perry rebrand for the male gaze. Even if it’s satire, we’re still giving the men something to jerk off to :/

2

Anonymous #54 14w

Pet play is kinda gross imo. Like, why are we trying to be animals. Just because it’s common doesn’t mean it’s okay

2

Anonymous #54 14w

Also, I would say that there are healthy ways to express oneself, and unhealthy ways to express oneself. I would say this is unhealthy. She’s allowed to do what she wants, but it doesn’t make it right. On top of that, being a public figure gives her the responsibility to be conscious of how she expresses herself publicly

6

Anonymous #85 14w

Ain’t she considered girly pop tho? Like was Madonna not a girls girl?

-5

Anonymous #78 14w

idk not to me

5

Anonymous #85 14w

Oh shut up

2

Anonymous #8 14w

I’m tired of women being told to ‘own’ the male gaze as empowerment. Why don’t we ask men to let go of it instead?

10

Anonymous #84 14w

Like the gaze itself. Like not have some standard look we admire?

3

Anonymous #88 14w

ngl i think i’m kinky too (even tho i’ve never tried it). also i have been raped/abused in the past as a kid and so you can imagine the effects of that. this image is hot asf to me but at the same time disturbing af. idk its confusing

-3

Anonymous #6 14w

Agreed. Men create and sustain the male gaze. it’s built around their standards, desires, and expectations. And yet somehow, women are the ones constantly told to navigate it, fix it, or justify how we respond to it. That’s the problem. Men shape the male gaze, but women are the ones held accountable for how we exist under it. Why is that our burden to carry?

5

Anonymous #5 14w

Exactly

4

U are so lost. This is a picture of a sexualized female popstar kneeling in front of a man. This is not reclamation. This is a product of the misogynistic music industry and you just eat it up blindly bc they want your cash.

8

So she’s comparing herself to a fking DOG now? This is incredibly embarrassing for women. What tf is this disgusting objectification

3

I have no idea what you is talkin bout. My pants can’t contain what’s currently trying to break out of them rn

0

Anonymous #90 14w

Yeah no. That’s not alright. You can disagree with expressions or morals but you don’t get to insult someone like that.

11

You think I’m going to sleep with this mess⁉️ cmon now ‼️

0

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

As a girl I just can’t get behind her. It’s one thing for any random woman to dress sexy, be submissive or have sex freely, embrace that she’s hot— all the power to her. But for a woman with a HUGE platform to compare herself to a sexual object, a DOG in this case, just feels like yet another instance of female popstars being objectified/oversexualized in order to sell music. None of this feels like a good use of self expression to me

2

Anonymous #56 14w

It is disturbing and objectifying. I have zero problem with kink, and regular women being openly sexual, but Sabrina making her entire branding about being a sex object (a DOG in this case) when she has an audience of millions is just giving ‘female popstar being sexualized yet again by the industry to sell records’ and is so creepily male gaze.

1

Anonymous #78 14w

Madonna absolutely was. She was openly sexual in a way that said “fuck you to the men and conservatives that call me a slut for being in charge of my body”. Instead, Sabrina is literally calling herself a DOG, on her knees, and all her songs are about how bad she needs a man to bang and how sad she is if he leaves her. Massive difference. She’s so not a girls girl.

5

Anonymous #78 14w

Explain how this is empowering. She’s not sexualizing herself in a way that says “fuck you to those who call me a slut for being in control of my body”. She’s quite literally calling herself a DOG, getting on her knees, and all her songs are about how badly she needs a man and how sad she is when he leaves her. This is so male gaze it’s embarrassing.

0

Anonymous #78 14w

That doesn’t even make sense. If it was about men and other men, why would SHE be on her knees acting like the dog.

3

Anonymous #73 14w

It’s so embarrassing like why are we going backwards. Can she get UP and sing abt ANYTHING other than being a dog for men

8

Anonymous #91 14w

I think it’s to make fun of how men baselessly shame women like that sexually. Could be wrong tho just a guess.

1

Anonymous #70 14w

Fr like this is SO embarrassing and not the “feminist girlypop move!” That her delusional fans think it is.

12

Anonymous #91 14w

So what does calling her a “slut” do about the issue of female popstars being objectified/oversexualized in order to sell music?? like girl… your long response just so you can be defensive & justify calling someone a slut because of a satirical image…

6

Aha ha I said pants 😎

-2

Anonymous #91 14w

Ahhh yeah I don’t actually listen to the music just know little basic bits of pop culture. Thank you tho

3

Anonymous #91 14w

So nowhere did I say it was empowering. I still laugh at the fact there were women who felt empowered by WAP. If this is the sole connection seen by many including you then yeah I guess she is a fucking mega skank, boptimusprime if you will

5

Anonymous #18 14w

…there is so much wrong with ur comment. This has nothing to do with “sexual liberation” and nothing to do with “she’s just hot”😨 please touch grass

3

Anonymous #5 14w

The entire point of the cover is to show that men treat women like dogs….

1

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

Evidently they do. Because they did.

2

Anonymous #8 14w

The entire point is to show that men treat women like dogs

1

Anonymous #91 14w

The photo is literally about how men treat women like dogs

1

Anonymous #94 14w

That isn’t what satire is.

8

Anonymous #93 14w

Well actually it is, as there are multiple forms of satire and this would be classified as ironic satire.

-2

Anonymous #94 14w

Double Fantasy by John Lennon And Yoko Ono went #1. Popularity ≠ Quality.

-2

Anonymous #94 14w

But that isn’t what it is, either.

0

Anonymous #93 14w

And where did I say anything about popularity=quality? I said the album would go #1, because it almost certainly will.

0

Anonymous #94 14w

And the Paul Brothers sell more PPVs than the greatest boxers of all-time. Congrats. You dumbass iPad kids are morons across the board.

-1

Anonymous #93 14w

If you don’t understand the cover in an ironic/satire/mockery then I genuinely can’t help you. I’m not about to get into a dictionary “that’s not what that means” type argument over this.

-1

Anonymous #93 14w

Didn’t get an iPad until grad school, next argument.

-2

Anonymous #94 14w

How long have you been training in mental gymnastics? Will we see you in the next Summer games?

2

Anonymous #91 14w

Sex is just sex. The only way sex IS NOT empowering is if it’s NOT consensual… Of course people are free to judge. But we should be honest about why and how we judge. If a woman posts a submissive or sexual photo, and your first reaction is to question her worth, intelligence, or empowerment… that says more about your conditioning than it does about her. She doesn’t need your approval. But you might want to re-evaluate why her expression bothers you so much.

7

Anonymous #93 14w

bitchhhh satire is “Im holding a mirror up to society” moment. This is one of those moments. The women are calling her a slut because she’s catering to the men. The men are calling her a slut cause she’s sexually depraved. So which is it? is she the icon of the male gaze or the president of slut nation? This is satire.

0

Anonymous #84 14w

That is not what satire is lmfao. You keep using that word, but you don’t know what it means.

0

Anonymous #93 14w

…am I thinking something is satire when it’s not? What is satire then, entertain me

3

Anonymous #88 14w

I get your point but it’s the people that see it and dont understand context, I fear they’ll think this is a norm and expect it upon themselves or on others.

1

Anonymous #84 14w

if a man treats a woman like she is a pet, why is the woman at fault for that treatment? Why shame her for being shamed by men? this is not mental gymnastics… this is critical thinking and comprehension

1

Anonymous #84 14w

Her lead single off this album literally starts off by calling men stupid, slow and pigs. I promise you, none of this is for the male gaze. This album cover was most likely sent to spark controversy and get people talking about it, and lo and behold, it is working very well.

1

Anonymous #94 14w

She’s never going to fuck you.

3

Anonymous #84 14w

There’s also no point in responding to 93 because they’ve made 3 comments about what satire isn’t but haven’t explained what it is.

2

Anonymous #94 14w

93 deleted. “all this mental gymnastics… will we be seeing you in the summer olympics?” I was gagged a little cause I haven’t heard that one before. I wanted to see where’d they go with it but they just kept repeating “you dont know satire” You’re right in there’s no point other than having my shit together, thoughts sorted out, for when ppl IRL start the “why do women feel the need to express being sexual?” discourse

2

Anonymous #84 14w

Either deleted or blocked. Either way, it was child’s play. It’s all just a dumb argument, I don’t know why they’re so hell bent over an album cover when she was doing multiple positions during Juno last year 😭 it’s a lack of media literacy because this cover is black and white satire, there’s no other way to view it lol

2

Anonymous #96 14w

God forbid women have hobbies

9

Anonymous #54 14w

it’s a tumblr phrase that means “everyone in this thread is talking about shit that does not matter”

3

Anonymous #78 14w

is it weirder if i say i just sit in silence with my thoughts lmao

1

Anonymous #5 14w

The album cover is most likely pertains to woman’s rights considering that woman have become second class citizens thanks to trump

-1

Anonymous #5 14w

The crazy thing is you're the first to refer to her as an object

2

Anonymous #99 14w

what the fuck

9

Anonymous #101 14w

Sex positivity is sex positivity, not "sex positivity but only when it's lesbian or if it's straight the woman is the dominant one." The same people criticizing it would be eating it up if she had a man on a leash for it.

-3

THIS

10

Anonymous #15 14w

Okay now post a selfie of you next to a pic of her 😬😬

24

Anonymous #99 14w

jesus christ

7

Anonymous #5 14w

She’s making a farcical commentary about the exact thing that everyone is mad at her for with the cover. I think her intention simply went over more heads than she anticipated

1

Anonymous #84 14w

I bet yo shit like the border under Biden. Open 24/7 as long as they brown 💀

-2

Anonymous #6 14w

Oh my god who cares

1

Anonymous #82 14w

The mouli’s do the shit too

1

Anonymous #91 14w

That’s a female role model 🤷‍♂️

-2

Bro you’re literally making me cringe with every comment you say 😭

2

Anonymous #106 14w

Ikr she’s crazy

2

Anonymous #107 14w

Nobody hates women as much as women 💀

-3

Anonymous #5 14w

thats on purpose, this album is probably gonna be criticism

2

Anonymous #21 14w

MAD was on Cartoon Network growing up, but even I’m too young for the magazine (21 😔) We need Spy vs. Spy remastered with impact frames 😁

12

Anonymous #60 14w

Bro unh yak is dead as hell in the summer, so I tend to branch out more into other communities

50

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 14w

Perry if I may say this where the college huzz won’t see you’ve helped raise my mood and give me advice time and time again over a long period of time I hope the man behind the mask is happy and enjoys his summer

25

Anonymous #109 14w

They still release the magazine

1

Anonymous #60 14w

I’m really glad I was able to help you out then dawg

16

This is clearly a marketing tactic to get people talking about the album

4

Anonymous #60 14w

I’m seeing it though 😈

4

Anonymous #5 14w

gng if she wants to dehumanize herself then its her choice, i feel like its even wilder to police how a grown woman can present herself

3

Anonymous mother_russia 14w

im not degrading or judging im just making a comparison. honestly its kind of telling if you think that im trying to put someone down here

7

Anonymous #102 14w

im not interested in dating you sorry

4

Anonymous #21 14w

24 on yik yak is wild

7

Anonymous #122 14w

I’m 28

3

Anonymous #121 14w

why are you on this app then? its for college students

5

Anonymous #121 14w

that's wild, u a predator

1

Anonymous #15 14w

I am a college student. I was held back a few years.

19

Anonymous #121 14w

you had to have been held back for like 8 years be fr

-13

Anonymous #15 14w

You do realize not everyone goes to college straight out of high school right?

68

Anonymous #114 14w

i sincerely doubt this person waited almost 10 years to start their bachelors degree and even if they did its weird for them to be talking to 18-22 year olds

-20

Anonymous #15 14w

You never had veterans in your class?

43

Anonymous #8 14w

She has been very explicit that it is for the male gays though?

1

Anonymous #18 14w

Fr like jesus let her do what she wants

3

As a grad student, we use this app a lot especially since YY upgraded to having a school only community rather than it being divided by distance. Yes the app was started by college students, but it’s no longer for that range. You have many minors on “Sidechat” as well. So the 18-22 role, never fully applied nor does it any longer.

36

Anonymous #69 14w

Maybe you’re the one in the wrong? Like it’s kinda crazy to say you’re a feminist and while simultaneously telling women what they can and cannot do.

3

Ok well I’m 23 does that suddenly become a problem

11

Anonymous #2 14w

Would’ve been better if she were the one pulling hair and he was on his knees

50

Anonymous #123 14w

Appealing to the male gaze ❌ Appealing to the male gays ✅

8

I am young people

16

I’m not you fucking weirdo

20

Anonymous #54 14w

you are literally defending it rn

-23

Anonymous #15 14w

No you’re being a bitch and assuming that everyone is on here to hit on 18 year olds which says a hell of a lot more about you

31

Anonymous #85 14w

Babe they are no girls girl, you are a yes man.

3

she most likely wouldn't be on yik yak tho 😭 that would be weird asf

-6

the pedos rlly downvoting us

-19

I want to know what’s going on my campus. You’re a fucking moron accusing people of being pedophiles for the stupidest goddamn reasons

39

Anonymous #54 14w

you basically are and you know it... grow up

-19

Anonymous #122 14w

I’m not a goddamn pedophile

22

Anonymous #122 14w

No the fuck I’m not

16

Anonymous #54 14w

then read the campus newspaper or news, not that hard to do without being weird

-17

it is and the fact that ppl defend it is even more mind boggling to me

-13

Anonymous #122 14w

Going on yik yak is not being weird. When you’re 23

20

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 14w

Hey there

3

Anonymous #54 14w

go run a poll in the fall asking the age of people on here for your campus. i ran one in the spring and it was 90% freshmen and sophomores

-6

Anonymous #116 14w

What’s up

2

Anonymous #39 14w

Why does it have to be a statement about how men treat women? Why can’t women be freaks in public? My god, such prudish behavior

2

Anonymous #54 14w

go use facebook or something

-8

Anonymous #15 14w

Our mod is 23. Most of the people I’ve talked to around 20-22. And nobody is on here to fuck

18

Anonymous #15 14w

I’m not 50

10

Anonymous #54 14w

suuuuuure

-7

Anonymous #15 14w

What the fuck is that supposed to mean

10

Anonymous #69 14w

What’s not progressive about women expressing their sexuality? I really want you to break down what is the “progressive” alternative. Covering up? Not ever presenting yourself in a sexual manner? Never expressing your sexuality desires through your art? Because that sounds like traditionalism and conservatism.

2

Anonymous #126 14w

Hey there anonymous commenter 126 👋

4

Anonymous #54 14w

who knows

-1

Anonymous #54 14w

you're pushing it

4