what mother russia meant to say was “Right, they compare in the sense that there’s some overlap. I’m assuming you meant “they aren’t comparable at all” as in “they aren’t equivalent.” You might not be thinking like this, but some people say, “It’s okay because at least we’re not as bad as China.” The U.S. and China aren’t doing the same thing or operating at the same level. China taking it further doesn’t justify what the U.S. is doing.”
What isn’t? Literally everything is spyware. Every app on your phone has your location, passwords, app tracking, number, email, credit card, search history, etc. everything online is spyware. All other apps will sell your data to China and anywhere else they want to or will pay enough. The literal only difference is that China isn’t paying a third party for our data, aka another company isn’t making money off of selling our information. That’s the only reason the government cares about it.
Every social media platform feeds data to the users. My TikTok feed (half a year ago bc I deleted it) was identical to all my other apps with food recipes and art and things. Whatever data china was supposedly feeding me, I received it from all other medias as well. If we are worrying about information and propaganda, who should get to decide what people can or can’t see and what is or isn’t propaganda?
Everyone is constantly exposed to propaganda, both from the American government and foreign ones, from companies and corporations, etc. but putting laws and restrictions about who can show us propaganda is a very effective way to have the government get full control over what propaganda the people will see.
If they made a law like “companies and corporations can’t be paid to change or influence users’ algorithms or to push any kind of unsponsored content” then anything outside of ads wouldn’t be allowed to be targeted unless the user showed interest in them. But they don’t want that, because they like propaganda.
Plus, even if the new owners of tiktok were explicitly found to be pushing an agenda with its users, it is still entirely up to the people to decide if they still want to use the app. The government should not be allowed to shut down an app for the entire country because they don’t like the propaganda or content shared on it.
Personally, I don’t care about TikTok and haven’t had it in a little over half a year and when I did have it, I hardly used it, BUT I don’t like the legal precedent it sets for the government to do this. If it’s allowed now, it will be allowed later. If the government can claim something is bad therefore no one in the USA can have access to it and we need a whole new app only for us that can’t have any investors involved that they don’t like or approve of.
How is it the government can demand no Chinese based investors and a whole new app but can’t demand that active government officials can’t vote or set laws for the companies they are actively invested in? It might seem a little off topic but the whole point of this is corruption and propaganda and our government just doesn’t like it when other countries do the same things to us that they are actively doing. It’s like a cat getting angry that a different cat is playing with one of their mice.
Well considering China and the US are fighting for global dominance and China consistently steals Intellectual property and collects information on American citizens for their own good. But regardless not one American app has a morality code when it comes to selling data. The US army got caught buying data from a Quran app on the App Store a while back.