Famously the author of Lolita, a book with a similar source material, BEGGED publishers to not sexualize the girl, yet you’ll see all these covers with that exact thing. Publishers often miss the point and don’t respect author’s wishes in the name of profit or to sensationalize these things.
So let me get this straight: Jennette McCurdy, who wrote a book about her personal abuse and sexualization as a minor and recently declined having a series be made about it because they wanted to make it a comedy, wrote this new book, and people saw the cover and heard the subject matter and immediately thought “Omg I hope she’s not sexualizing a minor!” with no additional thought? Didn’t even entertain that there’s a different possibility? Just out the gate, assumed she’s doing a 180? Wow.
You guys are honestly so weird, some of these comments are just talking about how you guys experienced sexual abuse yourself and you find this so disgusting. First off I’ve experienced sexual abuse, and this is not disgusting at all. Second off she’s talking about a 17-year-old…. Thirdly, you haven’t even read the book, I see why the cover may be out of pocket but do we know the storyline yet? Do we know the message? she is probably coping in someway, y’all always finding a reason to complain
i just know ts gonna tear me up like “im glad my mom died”. the amount of times i had to put the book down to breathe yet somehow couldn’t stop reading. though the cover’s a little iffy, i think its more from the stand point where the girl is being sexualized by the guy and the cover’s from his pov or smt?? idk how to explain it but theres no way jennette would write something that’s actually sexualizing children, anyone who read her other book would know that
Writing a book about a minor having sex with an adult IS sexualizing minors. Like textbook. The girl could have just as easily been 18, you can still do a meaningful story about grooming and predatory relationships with legal adults who are capable of consent. No one ever has to put statutory 🍇 on paper.
I think it’s purposeful for 2 important reasons 1- make people feel viscerally uncomfortable with the sexualisation of teens and confront that with the book 2- bait a specific audience into reading it (whether that in general be the smut crowd or specifically weirdos into minors) so they are forced to confront the uncomfortable issue they may otherwise avoid head on
No one is assuming she did a complete 180. We are just saying that this seems to be in poor taste and maybe she should reconsider the cover and storyline. Obviously we don’t know 100% yet if this is a little….yikes. but off of first impressions i do believe that this is completely tone deaf and a disappointing take from her.
the cover is quite literally what judging a book is for. based off first impressions of this book, from the cover and what we know of the plot so far, this is an incredible tone deaf take from her. obviously my opinion is subject to change as more comes out, but i’m allowed to have my own opinion based off first looks. and from what i see, i don’t like it. that’s all. you’re allowed to have your own opinion as well.
But it’s still important that we do. Why support isolating stories to only what’s socially appropriate? It’s important and vital these stories are shared, not just so victims themselves don’t feel as isolated or alone, as dirty or as shameful as society can make them feel, or so they can identify trends and patterns of abuse, but so others can be aware in some capacity of what that’s like. How it can feel like “love” or a “relationship”. Immersing yourself into the shoes of the characters…
I wouldn’t say “no one”. I’m just saying. It looks like maybe some conclusions are being leapt to a little hastily considering who she is and what her experiences are. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion and can be critical of whatever they like. I just worry that taking things at face value has become so common.
honestly every time i see media like this i hope they go down the route of what “diary of a teenage girl” did where it’s obvious it stems from a lack of self identity and confidence and they realize at the end, “wait I actually don’t need an older man to determine my worth and that guy is beyond a loser and needs severe help.” Rather than encouraging the behavior to teens it comes out as a place of self reflection 🤷🏽♀️
Based off the description it appears it’s going to come from a place of it’s normal for teenage girls to feel sexual attraction, and desires, and the person of those desires may be an adult. It’s the job of the adults in that child’s life to reject their advances and point them towards navigating those normal feelings in a safe and appropriate way, not take advantage of hormonal horny teens and groom them
as a survivor of csa and grooming i think books like these are extremely important. all of the things in this book happen in real life. to people like you, me and jeanette mccurdy. writing a book that details the manipulation tactics used by groomers, the lasting impacts on the girls, and the reactions of the people around them are pieces of the puzzle that prevent this from happening in the future. when you read a book like this it teaches you the warning signs.
I’m have a third theory after doing some thinking and reading the available description: It’s a powerful statement about how the actions of the teen and the self sexualization they do does NOT minimize their victimization. It’s not an excuse for the adult to have acted. So no matter how seductive she may have purposefully been, it was her abuser’s job as a trusted adult to see her for what she was: a child. Vulnerable & unable to process complex decisions and consequences of their actions
I agree that this is the case, however someone pointed out that this may be a book for girls who are actively in this situation. They don’t see anything wrong with it, and are probably consuming pornagraphic material of the relationship. This cover and title would be a draw in for that audience, in which case I think its purpose justifies having a cover that will also draw in pedophiles.
Seeing as she’s a victim of abuse herself like you said, I feel like it’s more about sharing a story that others can relate to as opposed to the glorification of abuse (though I will criticize her choice of cover art, and I hope she doesn’t describe the abuse in detail 😐). Obviously I haven’t read it so I can only hope, but as an abuse victim myself, I create art pieces that I feel others can relate to as a way to feel like I’m not alone in my struggles.
The whole point of Lolita was for it to be really obvious social commentary on how that’s gross and wrong but people have shockingly little reading comprehension and went “wow what a great story!” I think she probably is processing her own feelings through her preferred method of art (this isn’t her first book?) tho and don’t think it’s more wrong than a painting just cause it has words