Anonymous dr_foreskin 16w

we need more mouse bites to fix this

25

Anonymous #5 16w

idk y ppl r downvoting this was funny

103

Anonymous #29 16w

never underestimate the power of the pile on. the directional momentum of upvotes and downvotes usually trimps what a comment actually says

119

Anonymous #29 16w

wow.. you truly changed hearts and minds. my hero

70

Anonymous #30 16w

You act like this administration cares about rules

46

Anonymous #41 16w

inb4 he starts buying his stock back at a discount tbh.

2

Anonymous #15 16w

Ohh okay, so they didn’t break up

25

That’s how it works. Candidates need funds for their campaigns and give something back to their sponsors in return. Many people are in positions when they aren’t qualified

9

Anonymous #47 16w

All my 🥷🏾s hate Elon

17

Anonymous #3 16w

I was ur 1000 upvote

163

Anonymous #5 16w

i’m influential

31

Anonymous #29 16w

Prob cuz they assumed they were a conservative tryna make fun of the post idk

16

Anonymous #44 16w

I suppose their relationship is the same. Although Elon did disagree w Trump on the big and beautiful deal

35

Anonymous #44 16w

Bill*

6

Anonymous #48 16w

ty 🫶😛

57

Anonymous #45 16w

I don’t think they are fighting

-2

Anonymous justinian 16w

How is this something

8

"so?" lets be real, you can buy spots with trump

5

Anonymous #3 16w

Ngl this made me chuckle

45

Anonymous #1 16w

Hoping that step 2 is Trump follows him on this journey of moving a thousand miles away from us 🤞

961

Anonymous #5 16w

It won’t undo his salutes either

9

Anonymous #36 16w

Bahaha you act like that’s different for any of the other administrations. Only difference is you clearly didn’t vote for this one so now it matters.

-19

Anonymous #30 16w

no other administration has blatantly violated this many rules in such a short period of time, they’re destroying the country from the inside out

25

Anonymous #65 16w

Thank fucking god 👏🏻

107

Anonymous #3 16w

i was ur 2000 upvote 🙂‍↕️

32

Anonymous notsinatra 16w

I too am in the reply thread

8

Anonymous #67 16w

Feel free to drop the rules that were broken so I can look into more.

-19

Anonymous #70 16w

We must be soulmates.

21

Anonymous #15 16w

He’s such a loser good god, he walked in, did what daddy Trump wanted and left when he realized he was a tool

24

Anonymous #30 16w

I’ll give you a personal one: National Historic Preservation Act (1966) is being violated as DOGE has cut funds and fired staff of national parks and other federally funded labs/spaces that store archaeological and historic data and artifacts

15

Anonymous #30 16w

Oh please so where’s all the corruption of other administrations even close to this scale. How about you actually realize that this administration is fucking you over instead of this bullshit

5

Anonymous #30 16w

The blatant violation of the balance of powers should be number one. How about the blatant disregard for due process. Or maybe the fact that they’re just ignoring federal Judge’s rulings

9

Anonymous #5 16w

I’ve noticed that if you downvote yourself right away (-1) you’ll almost always get brigaded and downvoted more and more, regardless of what you posted.

18

Anonymous #73 16w

No he did it cuz his time in office was up

5

Anonymous #73 16w

He would’ve left Trump a long time ago if this were the case

1

Anonymous #65 16w

Thank god. Now his company’s just need to drop him.

55

Anonymous #3 16w

Exactly what I was thinking

4

Anonymous #3 16w

Saw that coming

3

Anonymous #88 16w

This was very well-known information and anyone who assumes they had a falling out instead of his term was just up, literally does not keep up with the news and gets their news from strictly social media

5

Anonymous #74 16w

No, I don’t think he left because they had a disagreement. He just left because his time is up.

14

Anonymous #88 16w

fitting youre number #88

2

Anonymous #15 16w

unfortunately this app is too stupid to understand that lol

3

Anonymous notsinatra 16w

*mouse noises*

4

Anonymous dr_foreskin 16w

hello forskin

1

Anonymous justinian 16w

you don’t get the meme it’s not if literally anything happens it’s when something huge, a life changing worldwide event like an asteroid happens or ww3

3

Anonymous #94 16w

Or when fardon becomes an element

1

Anonymous #3 16w

It was a situationship/fwb anyways they were never official 😭

52

Anonymous #44 16w

it was a situationship this whole time

7

Anonymous #75 16w

duh

1

Anonymous #3 16w

i'm crying at this

8

Anonymous #48 16w

i was ur 100 upvote

2

Anonymous #80 16w

“You will NOT be missed by anyone” there I fixed it

3

Anonymous #108 16w

Yes

1

Anonymous #102 16w

“Stupider”

5

Anonymous #38 16w

I was gon say sum about that 😭

1

Anonymous #38 16w

I was gon say sum about that 😭

1

Anonymous #75 16w

Bro

1

Anonymous #46 16w

I was gon say sum about that 😡

1

Anonymous #73 16w

You literally just made that up?!

1

Anonymous #67 16w

Please stop watching CNN and The View, the stupid is catching. These are the same people that said Biden was ok and perfectly healthy.

-7

Anonymous #111 16w

And you think Trump is perfectly healthy? I think they’re gaslighting yall on him too.

10

Anonymous dr_foreskin 16w

since he wasn’t approved by the senate, he had limited tenure. he stayed a few days over the maximum legal limit, actually.

1

Anonymous #115 16w

No he actually left 2 days before his limit. He had 130 days, until may 31st

1

Anonymous #117 16w

Lmao good joke

11

Anonymous #71 16w

Don’t you have lupus?

3

Anonymous #120 16w

Its never lupus

6

Anonymous #117 16w

Stop capping

4

Anonymous #111 16w

“mr musk” stop the dr

5

Anonymous #111 16w

Most of the media is biased towards the right

6

Anonymous #36 16w

If this ain’t a bald face lieeee

-2

Sorry but you’re just wrong. First of all, the “establishment” is conservatives. And second of all, any sane individual should be able to look at this administration and realize it’s a complete disaster and yet most legacy news media continues to act like it isn’t but also that the dumbassery Trump is doing is somehow good

5

Anonymous #15 16w

No, the Overton window in the US is so far to the right that anything that isn’t directly sucking Trump’s dick is called “far left extremism”

3

Anonymous #36 16w

Ah. I wish 😭

-2

Anonymous #15 16w

It literally is

5

Anonymous #15 16w

can you explain why #36 is wrong? like how theyre wrong about the overton window being so far right, and how the reality is we have a lot of far left extremism?

5

Anonymous #57 16w

First, most mainstream media leans left, especially on social and cultural issues. A well regarded 2020 Pew Research Center report shows that left leaning individuals trust a wider range of major outlets, while right leaning individuals trust far fewer, most notably Fox News. This indicates media consumption itself is slanted leftward in what dominates mainstream narratives. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/

1

Anonymous #57 16w

Second, the idea that the U.S. Overton window is far right doesn’t align with actual cultural trends or policies. In fact, in areas like gender identity, race, DEI, and climate, it has shifted significantly left in recent years. The fact that people can be called far-right just for defending basic traditional positions shows the opposite of what you’re arguing.

1

Anonymous #57 16w

Lastly, if anything, what’s labeled far left (like DEI overreach or climate policy) is often underplayed by media, not overplayed. There is a presence of far-left ideology in universities, social platforms, and even some corporate HR structures. That doesn’t mean the country is run by radicals, but it does mean far left influence is real, not a myth.

1

Anonymous #57 16w

So no, the Overton window isn’t “far right.” It’s center-left socially, center-right economically, and the media reflects that — not a far-right bias. Doesn’t sound like anyone who doesn’t “suck trumps dick” are considered left leaning… it’s that you’re way too extreme to consider a left leaning source for what it is.

1

Anonymous #15 16w

A far right authoritarian is in office. We have due process getting suspended just to attack POC. People proudly fly confederate flags. You guys call shit like gay rights “leftist extremism”. In any other country that would be called common sense. Bernie Sanders is a centrist in any developed country except the US. The Overton window is insanely far to the right

3

Anonymous #36 16w

Bro chill out 😭 he’ll be gone soon yall trippingggg

0

Anonymous #36 16w

Just proved my point about you being way too extreme to consider the truth of the matter.

0

Anonymous #15 16w

It is far right. And yes anyone that isn’t sucking Trump’s dick is labeled a far left extremist by every media outlet. We’re not even remotely close to the left on any issue

3

Anonymous #36 16w

Bro you’re calling Bernie a centrist but ignore that America leads the world in DEI, LGBTQ policy, and woke corporate culture. Pew and Gallup show media trust skews heavily left, not right. The real Overton window? Culturally left, economically center-right. You’re just so far left that anything moderate looks fascist to you 💀

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

claim: "most mainstream media leans left" support: "left leaning individuals trust more media" reality: right wingers literally openly deny science and evidence claim: "cultural trends and policies are left leaning" support: "gender identity, DEI, and climate shift left" reality: climate policy (and policies respecting racial/gender disparities) being left-leaning is proof of denial of science and evidence.

5

Anonymous #15 16w

claim: "there is a presence of far-left ideology in universities, social platforms, and corporate HR structures" support: ... reality: academia covering materials and using evidence coming to left leaning conclusions isnt what you want to get into

4

Anonymous #15 16w

You don’t know what far left is. Thinking black people are qualified to have jobs and gay people should have rights are not “far left”

5

Anonymous #36 16w

Congrats, literally all news media agrees with that.

0

Anonymous #15 16w

claim: "overton window is center-left socially, center right economically" support: ... reality: center right economically is an interesting claim -- right extreme would be like laissez faire capitalism, which is what trump and musk and everyone there really wants to get closer to, no government programs, less regulation. center left... civil rights and some social programs to promote more equal conditions through social classes are being stripped and attacked

2

Anonymous #57 16w

You keep trying to refute arguments by moralizing instead of addressing facts. Saying right-wingers deny science doesn’t disprove media bias… it just dodges the point. Studies from Pew, AllSides, and Ad Fontes all confirm mainstream outlets lean left in tone, framing, and coverage.

-1

Anonymous #57 16w

And disagreement with DEI, climate policy, or identity politics isn’t denial of science? it’s disagreement with how those issues are implemented socially and politically. That’s not the same thing…? Keep proving your extremism bruh

-2

Anonymous #57 16w

As for academia, when 90%+ of professors in some fields lean one way, you don’t get objective consensus, you get ideological homogeneity. That’s not proof of truth. It’s proof of an echo chamber.

-1

Anonymous #57 16w

You’re not arguing the facts. You’re just calling everyone who disagrees with you anti-science and hoping that wins the debate. It doesn’t.

-1

Anonymous #57 16w

we have states that are challenging gay marriage rights, theres hundreds of propositions of anti-trans legislation each year and exponentially growing, any efforts to fight police brutality and racial discrimination are being met with multiples of the force in the opposite direction, any efforts made to create economic justice between racial classes to benefit those groups and society is being shut down aggressively

4

Anonymous #57 16w

none of this disproves that media, academia, and culture overwhelmingly lean left. You keep moving the goalposts and hoping emotion beats logic. It doesn’t.

-2

Anonymous #15 16w

"disagreement with how those issues are implemented socially and politically" lets not be obtuse here, the argument has never been "how should be do this?" its "do or dont" academia is research. people that work with evidence. when they are actively researching and coming to consistent conclusions that are awaiting solid refute, thats as close to truth as youre going to get.

5

Anonymous #15 16w

saying im arguing with emotion when youre actively calling the people who do the research who work with the evidence and come to conclusions of things you cant refute as being truth as left leaning and wrong is just incredible

5

Anonymous #57 16w

You’re not making a case, you’re just exposing how deep you are in ideological extremism. I don’t have a cure for that disease… good luck with allat

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

"proof of an echo chamber" "its not objective consensus, its ideological homogeneity" maybe research to you means talking with friends and coming to one conclusion but thats not the reality here man

3

Anonymous #15 16w

You're not arguing the facts. You're just calling everyone who disagrees with you "in ideological extremism" and hoping that wins the debate. It doesn't. sorry just had to edit what you said before

5

Anonymous #57 16w

Downvoting doesn’t make you right 🤣

-2

Anonymous #57 16w

Extremist**

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

it doesnt make me right but it doesnt make you right either thats for sure it does satisfy me a little bit though. and nothing youve said being right also satisfies me

4

Anonymous #15 16w

sorry i quoted exactly your words, you said "in ideological extremism" not "extremism" hence the quotes

3

Anonymous #15 16w

Check Fox News or the 800 other conservative news outlets because they definitely do not agree with that

4

Anonymous #57 16w

Because you incorporated it into your sentence wrong. Didn’t u pass English? You shoudkve said “extremeis(t)”

0

Anonymous #57 16w

[t]* oops

0

Anonymous #15 16w

its an exact quote, idk if you know this but you dont change those except for specific use cases, which this did not meet the criteria for.

3

Anonymous #57 16w

Go back to 9th grade English my dude

0

Anonymous #15 16w

please share with me the specific grammar rules regarding altering an exact quote

1

Anonymous #15 16w

It’s not an echo chamber. You’re just objectively wrong. Sorry but science and decades of evidence prove that conservatives are wrong and reporting those objective facts is not “left leaning bias”. I’ve had 2 professors ever say anything left leaning and it was history professor say that the KKK was bad and geology professor say the earth is older than 6000 years old

4

Anonymous #57 16w

Google is free

-1

Anonymous #57 16w

i said youre calling people [x] and quoted exactly what youre calling people. id love to see the specific guidelines about that

1

Anonymous #15 16w

Logic beats emotions. And all conservatives have is emotional arguments

5

Anonymous #15 16w

google is free but youre making an unsubstantiated claim

3

Anonymous #36 16w

I literally provided 3 different sources 😭 and I’m not conservative KEEP proving your extremism, ur only embarrassing urself

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

the three sources: a pew research link where you came to a conclusion about what people are trusting and not the actual content itself, and then mentioning pew again and gallop, and rhen mentioning pew, allsides, and ad fontes

5

Anonymous #15 16w

"keep proving your extremism"

3

Anonymous #57 16w

Bro thought he did sumn 💀 I read it three times now bro

0

Anonymous #57 16w

3 more sources than u gave 😭😭

0

Anonymous #15 16w

3 sources more? no, thats one source and four hey guys i remember this but not gonna cite anything. and the one source you did use was bad (already explained it, please go up and read instead of OH OH YOU YOU DONT LIKE SCIENCE) i cannot imagine how many classes id fail if i did shit like this

2

Anonymous #57 16w

Like talking to a brick wall. I feel bad for your friends.

0

Anonymous #15 16w

hold on let me quote you again "you keep... hoping emotion beats logic. it doesnt" lets see a real argument sometime soon

3

Anonymous #15 16w

Thinking that Global warming is real when there’s mountains of evidence proving it is real, is not left wing extremism. And leave you with this, if America was anywhere near as left as you claim it is, then an authoritarian like Trump would never have gained traction

5

Anonymous #36 16w

No one is denying climate change… I’m calling it out. They’ve been using climate change as a fear tactic since the 60’s and it’s the same thing: “the world will have a catastrophic event in ≈10 years because of humans!!” And none of it ever happened. Sorry that I don’t blindly trust politicians on the climate 💀

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

I trust the scientists on it

5

Anonymous #73 16w

Cool, so do I. That’s why I also trust atmospheric physicists like Richard Lindzen (MIT), William Happer (Princeton), and Patrick Moore (co-founder of Greenpeace)… all of whom reject the alarmist narrative. Climate change exists, but let’s not pretend the 10 years till catastrophe claim hasn’t been recycled since the 1960s and never delivered. Not all scientists agree with the political spin. Trusting science ≠ blindly trusting politicians and headlines.

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

Hey so the majority of scientists are stating that we will do irreversible damage if we don’t fucking fix it in 10 years. We’ve tried to do this in the passed with 2 other accords, however no one showed up to the Japan one and it was a verbal agreement for the second but the third, was the Paris Climate Accords which is what we are following now. Climate change is not a political spin and you calling it that proves how little you know. I am studying this for a career.

4

Anonymous #38 16w

You say the majority of scientists agree, but science isn’t a popularity contest, it’s built on repeatable evidence and peer-reviewed dissent. If consensus alone decided truth, Galileo would’ve been wrong. And we all know today how right that man was.

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

One thing I think republicans should consider is the impact of climate catastrophe on the birth rates they care about so much. Many women cite climate change as the reason they’re choosing not to have children. Taking action to protect the planet would have many positive effects, and one of them is a higher birth rate.

1

Anonymous #38 16w

Also, you’re proving my point: we’ve had international climate deadlines every decade for the past 60 years, and none of those “10-year doomsday” predictions delivered.

-1

Anonymous #15 16w

Furthermore, you stating that the catastrophe isn’t going to come (guess what it will. Sorry that I want the future generations to have a good life?) is just incorrect. Please shut up unless you’re majoring in it. You’re looking really uneducated. Because the catastrophe isn’t coming in 10 years, it’s irreversible. As in if we don’t fix it in 10 years then a catastrophe WILL come. And also climate change is the reason we’re having more hurricanes, floods, fires, freezes, tornadoes, drought

4

Anonymous #38 16w

I didn’t deny climate change. I questioned the alarmism, the politicization, and the media’s refusal to platform dissenting experts like Lindzen, Happer, or Patrick Moore.

-1

Anonymous #38 16w

And if you’re studying this for a career, you should know: political pressure has influenced scientific funding, not the other way around. They didn’t teach that?

1

Anonymous #38 16w

You’re not disproving anything I’ve said… you’re proving it. You’re leaning on predictions that have already been made over and over again since the 1960s and still haven’t manifested the way media and politicians claimed they would.

0

Anonymous #38 16w

I never denied climate change. I questioned the alarmist deadlines, which were repeated for decades and never came true. That’s not uneducated. That’s historical observation.

0

Anonymous #38 16w

If you really believe in science, then you should understand that disagreement and skepticism, especially from scientists like Lindzen, Happer, and Moore, isn’t ignorance. It’s part of the scientific process.

-1

Anonymous #38 16w

Also, yelling “shut up unless you’re majoring in it” isn’t how knowledge works. Either your argument stands on logic and data, or it doesn’t.

-1

Anonymous #38 16w

Surprise surprise, everything you’re learning in your classes can be found on Google.

-2

Anonymous #15 16w

king tides are becoming more frequent which is so dangerous as they cancel unpredictable. La Niña years is becoming stronger creating more hurricanes hitting the east coast, where as El Niño creates drastic weather changes. The spring tides are getting extremely high and our sea walls cannot keep up

3

Anonymous #38 16w

That’s a good example. But stronger La Nina/El Nino events aren’t automatically proof of catastrophic human-caused climate collapse. Correlation isn’t causation, and variation over decades isn’t new. What is new is how often short-term anomalies are used to justify sweeping, centralized policies. Scientific honesty means recognizing patterns and questioning exaggerated forecasts…especially when they’ve been wrong for over half a century.

0

Anonymous #15 16w

If you believe science. You wouldn’t be skeptic about this issue. All of the other “ten year clocks” ended. They weren’t pushed back. Those ones had their permanent damage done and we’re seeing it right now. And science is literally a popularity contest thats how we create theories. Multiple options are put out and the debate and majority tends to go in the textbook as you learn about the other failed hypotheses

3

Anonymous #15 16w

Surprise surprise no shit? However you know fucking nothing

3

Anonymous #15 16w

Okay yeah you’re right sure the world is literally on fire way more often than it was 10 years ago, and 20, and 30 but it’s totes normal. I’m literally majoring in this shit and you’re going about saying “meh not a big deal” to to a college and ask around. Learn from a professor not Google

2

Anonymous #38 16w

Google is free. I’m sorry for your disease.

1

Anonymous #15 16w

I’m sorry for your incompetence. You do know you don’t have to go to school to talk to a professor? Just look up his office and ask some questions

5

Anonymous #15 16w

HURRICANE HELENE WAS A DIRECT RESULT OF CLIMATE CHANGE DUMBASS

4

Anonymous #46 16w

Tbh bro trump is probably the most corrupt and incompetent president ever

5

Think about the convenient places she could just make a surprise visit to, knowing that bad things occur because of her.

3

Anonymous #115 16w

And the freezing of Texas. And the California fires. And the Canada fires. And the Carolina fires. And the Hawaii fires. And the Australia fires

1

Anonymous #128 16w

is he gregnant?

4

Anonymous #57 16w

Am I pregegnat?

3

Anonymous #38 16w

Is he pregananant?

3

Anonymous #1 16w

But it ends a thousand miles away, probably in some desert somewhere

1

Anonymous #3 16w

i know who you are

1

Anonymous #102 15w

No way u typed “stupider” with a straight face 😭

3

Anonymous #46 15w

Bro forgot about Nixon

1

Anonymous #46 15w

Wildly stupid comment right here

2

Anonymous #15 15w

I mean I wouldn’t call Nixon incompetent. Corrupt? For sure but he wasn’t incompetent. In fact his foreign policy skills were actually really good and he did start many of environmentalist programs like the EPA

1

Anonymous #134 15w

😛

3

Anonymous #88 15w

lol

3

Anonymous #88 15w

lolol

3

Anonymous #88 15w

lololol

3

Anonymous #98 15w

so he didn’t fulfill his agreement, but yes this was because he could only be in the position for 130 days

1

Anonymous #67 15w

Wym he didn’t fulfill it? he left 2 days before his allotted time

1

Anonymous #30 15w

i feel like we can say it was not ended on good terms

1

Anonymous #30 15w

elon throwing epstein accusations too

1

Anonymous #88 15w

oops

5

Anonymous #57 15w

Elon is mad 😂 I wonder what happened. We all know Biden would’ve released it if there was any incriminating info in there tho. We all know he was on the flight list already

0

Anonymous #15 15w

biden probably didnt release it because friends and powerful people he needed and liked were on it. trump wont do it because hes on it elon is mad because trump wants to get rid of elons subsidies for evs and spacex, which really proves the point that elon is a libertarian except for himself because he lives on government money

3

Anonymous #88 15w

So you wanna keep with this? You act like this administration cares about the rule of law

7