_fred_
Not that bad actually! Employment stats can be confusing though so here's some hopefully clarifying info...Long story short... all of these economic terms like: "Unemployment rate", LFPR, EPR, etc.. are super loaded and have a bunch of caveats and convoluted counting criteria. The actual raw comparison in ๐ฉ shows the percentage of employed americans. Which has been roughly rising since 1950 and is near a somewhat all-time high. From under 40% in ~1960 to almost 50% today... not bad!
One issue with the green ๐ฉ line is that it includes retired people, minors (under 16), disabled people, felons in prison... etc who are inelligible to legally work. That's why the idea of the "labor force" exists. The labor force is only the eligible portion of the population. Thus the yellow ๐จ line shows what ratio of the "labor force" is currently employed: "Employment population ratio"
One issue with the yellow ๐จ line is that some people are elligible to work, but are out of a job temporarily for one reason or another, but will return to work or at least show intent to return to work. These temporarily unemployed people are called "Unemployed" (Capital U). The blue ๐ฆ line just above our yellow ๐จ line includes these "Unemployed" people and shows the percentage of the population participating in the "labor force"... thus "Labor force participation rate"
Which bring us to our brown ๐ซ line... sigh... buddy... The "Unemployment" rate is just the difference between LFPR and EPR. In other words blue ๐ฆ minus yellow ๐จ. 100-Unemployment is actually a useless number. I put it on there to illustrate that the Unemployment rate is misleading and mostly unhelpful