Anonymous #4 6w

It’s all a game of the rich. They put in power corrupt narcissists like Trump who are willing to cut the red tape for corporations to make more money. And also to screw over their consumers.

4

Anonymous #5 6w

It’s totally cynical from both sides. There is zero evidence of any major conspiracy, yet people pushed it anyway. Why you ask? Simple, it made money, forwarded an agenda, or gave them attention. Like 9/11 JFK MLK the moon landing and so on, we know what happened, we know the truth, but people won’t accept that.

-1

Anonymous #5 6w

Opposition control and media fatigue are the answers to your question. Read more is the answer to your broader point.

2

Anonymous #3 6w

So you believe that the people on that list are powerful enough to control the entire media and orchestrate an entire narrative just to drop it and distract the whole country with a woman in jeans, but not powerful enough to make their names disappear from a sealed court case? Keep in mind you are implicating both the Biden DOJ FBI etc and the entire Trump DOJ FBI etc. I don’t buy it.

3

Anonymous #5 6w

At the same time all these all powerful pedo oligarchs somehow ended up on Epstein’s list, but couldn’t pull some strings to get their boy off?

0

Anonymous #5 6w

Why would they want him off? If anything, they would want him silenced. Epstein was using blackmail of course they would want that buried with him.

1

Anonymous #4 6w

If he was really blackmailing all there people wouldn’t he have a protocol in place where it gets released if he died under suspicious circumstances? You’re threatening people with enough money to hire ex delta force members to go after you, and you don’t have an insurance policy in place? They would want him off so they didn’t have the heat, if they wanted to “deal with him.” They’d do it quietly, for instance by taking down his jet over the Pacific Ocean. Not during a media circus.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

No because Epstein was working for either the CIA and/or MOSSAD.

1

Anonymous OP 6w

And your evidence for this is? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, what do we have to prove that? And why would they even do something like that? Also the point stands, if he was working for high level state actors, why didn’t they intervene to protect their asset? Or at least make his death less suspicious. We know for a fact that the CIA developed undetected toxins which simulate a heart attack. They could have easily slipped him something like that. Same for Mossad.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

His brother said he was mossad. It’s the only explanation as to why the banks, the gop, the Dems, Israel, the cia, and the fbi are all on the same side of not wanting to release rhe files

1

Anonymous OP 6w

So, other than a website called “the electronic intifada.” Tucker Carlson, and various sites like the daily stormer, I can’t find a single source for that claim. It appears that one of Epstein’s victims said he claimed to be mossad before assaulting her but that’s hardly credible. People who are committing SA generally do so for a feeling of power, claiming to be something important and dangerous like that is par for the course.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

The rest of the “evidence” I’ve seen is that his girlfriend’s dad was tangentially connected to Mossad at one point. Fk man, I was tangentially connected to a literal billionaire at one point. That doesn’t make me anything special.

1

Anonymous OP 6w

And the reason that “the banks.” (Wtf does that mean.). The Republicans, the Democrats, and the state and apparently Israel, are not releasing the files might be that they are all involved. Or there might just be no files to release and both parties (Israel had nothing to do with it.). Used it as a political weapon to spike at the other party when they were in power.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

Once again. If all those organizations were involved, couldn’t they just falsify the documents and release them? Like, I don’t think a court ordered seal could stand in the way of something that big.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

Idc about the court ordered seal. The grand jury testimony is bullshit. We’re asking for the fbi files, which exist.

1

Anonymous OP 6w

So you say the FBI is in on this? But somehow trust them to release true documents that incriminate themselves. Alright then. Once again, if this conspiracy exists, it doesn’t but let’s say it does, they could easily falsify those documents and leave no trace that we the people could find. The FBI has already released the vast majority of their files, all that’s left essentially falls into two categories. 1. Things that identify an individual as possibly involved without proof. 2. CSAM

1

Anonymous #5 6w

The first kind should not be released to the public because of the rights of those mentioned. We do not have the right to know who the FBI thought might be possibly involved, it would ruin the reputation of innocent people and put their lives in danger. And we certainly will never see Epstine’s personal CSAM spank bank. No way no how that’s happening.

1

Anonymous #5 6w

I forgot a third category. 3. Things which identify victims. People have the right to have the documentation of their brutal SA kept away from public scrutiny. Bottom line, there will always be files which will stay sealed, for perfectly legitimate reasons. But that will never satisfy the conspiracy theorists, because the truth is never as satisfying as the fiction which exactly confirms their deepest world views.

0