Anonymous #1 14w

I think ppl just like putting women down. I can’t really think about what Sabrina and Sydney doing is wrong. Bonnie promotes toxic ideologies but it’s her self that’s being harmed in the process and it’s her right. It should be in a vacuum but it’s not unfortunately these r the ideas being pushed on little girls

13

Anonymous OP 14w

I agree but these ideas aren't...new. Its always been this way, and if little girls know about ideas pushed by Bonnie then we have way bigger fish to fry. I think social media over inflates things

2

Anonymous #1 14w

100% but we have to admit when people contribute to things rather than just the bigger picture

6

Anonymous OP 14w

Yes but then what yk? If we start going on about individuals spreading toxic ideologies we're gonna be here for a while. I think all we can do now is learn to be better parents, educators, or any kind of support system for children in hopes they don't grow up listening to people like that.

5

Anonymous #2 14w

Tasteful nudity or hinting at sex isn’t the same as 1,000+ people slamming into you and it being on every corner of the internet

0

Anonymous #3 14w

Thank u

-1

Anonymous #4 14w

I know!! I hate it

-1

Anonymous OP 14w

Yea but which one is seen more by young girls. Which one does society give a positive spin to. Ask a kid what they want to be when they grow up, none will say porn star but a lot will say pop star.

6

Anonymous #3 14w

no it doesn't at all 😂 tell a gooner and a heroin addict to go cold turkey and one of them will get sick and likely die. the other will simply be better off. addiction is a literal disease and ppl need to learn the difference between that, compulsion, obsession and fixation. it can absolutely have a horribly negative impact but it's not an addiction and treating it like one only serves to create further misunderstanding and stigma which only worsens the issue

9

Anonymous #3 14w

the dominant position of medical and mental health professionals disagrees with you

5

Anonymous #7 14w

Yea you’re just wrong lmao. Porn is stimulating. Anything stimulating can be addictive. It’s why there’s warning labels on basic things like coffee. The human brain is wired to want what it likes. If there’s a chemical imbalance in someone’s brain, they’re more likely to be addicted to a sort of stimulus. To say porn isn’t addictive is extremely dismissive and violently uneducated.

-2

Anonymous #8 14w

Caffeine is addictive because it blocks adenosine receptors. Not all forms of stimulation are addictive. You have no clue what you're talking about. You're ignorant asf and way overconfident in your response. Please sit down

11

Anonymous #8 14w

argue with the dominant medical institutions about it. idc 😂

3

Anonymous #7 14w

They'll say "they can't because it's an addiction" but you've already seen how lacking in accurate information some people are. They care more about sounding/feeling right than actually being correct. Rather than seeking knowledge they work backwards from a bias they hold until they find something that suits it and then run with it

3

Anonymous #7 14w

The dominant medical institutions like the APA acknowledging and delineating process addictions from substance addictions in the DSM-V? It’s amazing how much you’ve typed for someone who ‘dc’

-1

Anonymous #10 14w

when i say idc i mean about their incorrect *opinion*. i care about being accurate, unlike yourself

3

Anonymous #10 14w

To add to their comments, using the DSM as hard truth is dumb asf and most ppl who rely on it professionally will tell you it's a rough guideline, not some grand truth

3

Anonymous #9 14w

thank you! my own therapist advises against ppl who aren't trained on the language from reading it - because it will often lead to misinterpretation/misunderstanding that can worsen people's perception of what they/others are dealing with

3

Anonymous #3 14w

also "cancerous" is crazy language to use and highly offensive on several levels. you likely don't care but it's something to reconsider. there are many ways to state you think something is destructive to society without using that language

1

Anonymous #7 14w

Cancerous isn’t the same as ableism, the actual Latin meaning of cancer is crab because cancer cells look like a crab and spread out.

-1

Anonymous #7 14w

Cancerous is a valid verb

-1

Anonymous OP 14w

nobody said ableist dingdong

1

Anonymous OP 14w

it's an offensive adjective

2

Anonymous OP 14w

y'all have no clue what the key words you're using mean

1

Anonymous #7 14w

I didn’t even use it but it’s not even offensive you’re just a wimp.

-1

Anonymous #7 14w

Cancerous is a valid adjective and verb 🤘

-1

Anonymous OP 14w

never said you used it ding dong. the key word you don't understand is "addiction" 🤘😂

2

Anonymous #7 14w

🤭 got 'em!

2

Anonymous #7 14w

I think porn is addictive.

-1

Anonymous #7 14w

I just think you’re opinion of cancerous is wrong

-1

Anonymous #10 14w

weed isn’t addictive. nicotine however is a different story. most ppl that seem to be “addicted to weed” smoke with things that have nicotine in them (cigarellos, backwoods, etc.)

2

Anonymous #10 14w

weed isn't addictive. dependence ≠ addiction. i'm not arguing. you can argue with the dominant position of the medical and psychiatric institutions that study and define these things

2

Anonymous #10 14w

Weed literally isn’t addictive but okay.

4

I know a nerve was struck when you're reading into punctuation that much 😭 Give it up kid

1

Matter of fact you keep pointing out how much everybody cares... Projection is a terrible thing to deal with. I pity you really

2