Anonymous #4 15w

Nah the term for men is gigalo weve just popularized the one for women bc its mostly used on women

36

Anonymous #6 15w

It can be used on anyone but women are more offended by it, so it’s usually used on us bc you’d call men something that would offend them more

-17

Anonymous #10 15w

What’s the word you’d call a man then?

4

Anonymous #6 15w

Welll for me personally it’s gender neutral lol

3

It actually wasn’t and I have a degree in evolution and ecology if you want to talk about human evolution and mating styles of humans for hundreds of thousands of years. Spoiler: it was monogamous. Serial monogamy ~60% of the time, but still monogamous, and multiple physiological features in homosapiens compared to previous ancestors suggest a shift from promiscuous behavior (ecological term, not what you likely use) to monogamy

7

Not only that, but polygyny wasn’t common until the Neolithic era with the hoarding of resources, which is only the past 10,000 years out of our 300,000. Before that, promiscuous behavior was seen in both men and women. Women were more selective than men, but they often didn’t have the same father for their children if they lived to have multiple.

5

I’m a guy so it’s hilarious you assumed I was girl lmao. Also people aren’t “prizes”, they’re fucking human beings dude. We aren’t cavemen anymore, we don’t have to fuck like rabbits in order to survive. We live in a society in case you haven’t noticed. Sorry you didn’t develop your frontal lobe enough to understand that

15

Anonymous #13 15w

He’s literally not. Both of his claims are actively refuted by the data we have on sexual behavior as well as scientific evidence against his “well men are biologically meant to” bs

15

Anonymous #14 15w

Because men are more likely to engage with different partners while women are more likely to engage with the same.

12

Anonymous #12 15w

And who are their different partners? Different women

2

Anonymous #14 15w

Genuine answer but think of it this way, let’s say there are 20 men and 20 women. Of those 20 men, 15 of those men are willing to have casual sex, and of those 20 women 5 women are willing to have casual sex. Those 15 men are just going to be bouncing back and forth between those 5 women. While the remaining 15 women and 5 men are going to be waiting for committed relationships/at least waiting for consistent dating.

12

Anonymous #15 15w

OTHER MEN. final answer

11

Anonymous #8 15w

🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

3

Anonymous #12 15w

Idc about all that but sex is easier to access for women that’s not refutable

-1

Anonymous #10 15w

i was technically thinking about this, cause men aren’t as offended to be called a slut, whore, etc as much as they are afraid of the f slur. cause I’ve seen men throw hands cause someone called them the f slur, including gay and straight men. Although sometimes you can say the f slur with a deeply unserious tone and it’s chill though

10

Anonymous OP 15w

Yk I see that bc I’ve seen guys fist fight over someone calling them gay or the f slur seriously but since they consider whore or slut a more feminine insult they kinda just giggle at it

4

Anonymous #13 15w

A) I’m not refuting it’s easier for women to get laid. I’m saying women elect not to sleep with many partners to an extent that men are still more likely to have multiple B) what does this even have to do with OP’s post? Because men are more desperate to get laid that means they’re not sluts or something?

3

Anonymous #18 14w

I like your point, but I think you’re forgetting that a solid 40% of the “willing” group is unable (they aren’t social enough for example). That still leaves a 9:5 ratio on the hoes vs losers, which is still a solid amount. The main problem is this: is a hoe one who gets (at a given point), or one who has gotten (at any point). If it is A, then only 25% of both boys and girls are hoes. If B, then 25% girls and 45% of boys. That means that boys are up 20%

-2

Anonymous #14 14w

If 20% isn’t enough to state that girls are more hoeish (the original question), why is it suddenly enough to say that boys are?

-1

Anonymous #14 14w

where are you getting your numbers from?

4

Anonymous #12 14w

A) If you’re not refuting my assertion then why reply. I’m telling you that’s the point I’m agreeing with. Anything else is irrelevant you replied to my comment. B)I’m not replying to OP… but I’ll say sex is viewed differently by men and women and it’s mainly from the opposite sex. Women don’t care about high body counts, men usually do. Men like when they meet a virgin women, women see it as problematic. That’s a societal thing that deals with preferences and influences perceptions on sex.

0

Anonymous #16 14w

Facts, polygamy is just cringe all together but its even worse if one gender can easily degrade themselves to a moist hole just to turn around and say “but why arent they being called whores?”

1