Anonymous #8 7w

I do agree though she might wanna consider her options lol

33

Anonymous #10 7w

yes. let’s create 3 lives with no money, no plan, essentially setting 3 children up for failure😍

21

Anonymous #2 7w

Literally like I’m all for knew what you was doing and shit so you gotta man up but then babies will have a terrible life most likely just abort and make better choices next time

7

Anonymous #11 7w

same like we can’t be serious here😭 ppl are pro-life until the lives are actually here

2

Anonymous #3 7w

She will be poor for the rest of her life unless she’s in a VERY well off family, and it just started 😭 not you wishing that on her

49

Anonymous #6 7w

I was waiting for this😭😭

11

Anonymous #8 7w

The real question is: can she take care of all of them emotionally/physically, and provide for their NEEDS , and be able to indulge their wants in order to bring a happy well rounded childhood.

18

Anonymous #16 7w

It just makes it feel kind of forced ykw I mean

5

Anonymous #13 7w

You do realize pushing her to have an abortion goes against the same "body autonomy" philosophy as pro-lifers, right?

16

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Yessssssss!!!!!! Forcing an abortion is just as bad as forcing someone to keep the baby!!!!! Sorry I loved that you said that 😅

28

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Never said I was pro-life, I’m pro-take care of the kids you have and if you can’t take care of them you shouldn’t have them. Theres no way in hell an 18yr old is ready to take care of 3 newborns. 18 is a newborn adult 😭

10

Anonymous #5 7w

A vast majority of people don't actually care about the issues they claim to care about and that's the unfortunate truth. Whole bunch of virtue signaling.

14

Anonymous #13 7w

Listen man: I am the abortion queen. I love abortion, and I think anyone should be able to have one for any reason. The point of reproductive rights, though, is that we should always be fighting for people to make their own choices. If it’s her dream to have triplets, then hell yeah. If she doesn’t want to, then hell yeah explode those chicken thangs !!!!!!!!!! 💥💥💥💥💥💥

18

Anonymous #13 7w

I never said you were pro-life. Clearly you didn't understand my pretty clear argument which means you're likely not smart enough to even be worth arguing with.

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

No I understood clearly about how “making” someone have an abortion is just as wrong as disallowing it completely but there are four human lives on the line, it’s not the situation to be calling out double standards when there’s much more nuance to it than that. Obviously no one can force her to abort but we have to be realistic with ourselves. It’s downright selfish and grossly irresponsible to have one child you can’t take care of let alone three at once. Sometimes the best decisions can suck

4

Anonymous #13 7w

You don't even know the person in question or their circumstances. You're making a lot of baseless assumptions.

6

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

It seemed like you weren’t smart enough to work out the part where she doesn’t have to get an abortion if she doesn’t want to I just said it’s the smartest choice😭 since you went there first lmao

1

Anonymous #13 7w

It might not be the best or smartest choice. You know nothing.

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

WHAT 18 year old has enough money to take care of not one but THREE newborn babies. wtv money she may or may not have probably is her parents not hers. be so fr rn. obviously the choice is hers, but from an outsider looking in this would be a terrible choice to decide on

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Unfortunately I just don’t think ur grasping how serious raising kids is, and freshly graduated college bound 18 year olds should not be attempting it

1

Anonymous #2 7w

The father could be present. His family can be well off. Maybe her parents would be willing to help. There is a lot of other factors to consider.

6

Anonymous #13 7w

It's been done before. I'm not saying she should make a specific decision, though. It's ultimately up to her and that's how it should be. Voicing your opinion on this when you know nothing is just as bad as telling someone not to get an abortion.

3

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Even if the father stays in her life teen fathers are notorious for leaving 😭 like take as old as time man we cannot be leveraging these children’s livelihoods on a teen father

1

Anonymous #13 7w

You are just as bad as an avid pro-lifer😂

2

Anonymous #8 7w

Would you let someone have a child if you knew they couldn’t take care of it? That’s genuinely what ur endorsing right now. I’m all for reproductive rights, but I don’t have to stand with every woman especially when she decides not to get an abortion when that could be the best option for her and those kids. Not aborting is the status quo and expected of mothers by society so no I will not congratulate or support it when someone chooses to be irresponsible with children’s livelihoods

-3

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

You don’t need to know them they got pregnant at 18 before she even got on her college campus and it was triplets obviously they can’t make good decisions by themselves let alone take care of themselves

7

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

i never said it’s never been done before, i said be realistic. carrying three children even as a more mature woman is risky asf as is. so she should risk her life, with again possibly no plan, no money for what exactly? unless she has an amazing support system which from the sounds of her brother’s opinion she doesn’t have, she’s going to struggle badly and the kids will suffer. like i said her decision at the end of the day, but i would not do that to myself

1

Anonymous #12 7w

Who going to take care of the triplets

40

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Wtv helps you sleep at night buddy ✌️

0

Anonymous #11 7w

EXACTLY!!!

4

Anonymous #11 7w

U right!!

8

Anonymous #2 7w

I never said what she should be doing. If you bothered to read anything I said, you would know that. My point is that should be what you are doing. Arguing for a specific outcome like you are now is just as bad as pushing someone to not get an abortion.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

convinced you can’t read bc i literally said it’s still her choice…

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

i gave scientific backed facts. you’re arguing over morality, good day💀

3

Anonymous #2 7w

Your argument is using hypotheticals to emotionally manipulate someone into supporting a specific decision😂 Literally the SAME thing pro-lifers do!

-2

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

babe google is free. carrying triplets is literally so hard on women’s bodies. go look it up before continuing to speak. my points were both scientific and personal opinion. where’s your evidence?? better yet are you even a woman?

6

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

I’m actually drawing conclusions based on this post and what I’ve seen from teen/young parents. Most people are never ready to raise kids, and teens sure as hell aren’t. Yea it’s been done before but as a parent why would you advocate to settle for less for your own flesh and blood. If the girl really cared about having a stable family she’d abort and start over when timing is appropriate. Not hard to understand what I’m saying.

1

Anonymous #2 7w

You have provided no evidence or data. No "scientific opinion" was even stated. You barely even made a claim at all. You can have an opinion, never said you couldn't. Even if you're right, you really have no right to be pushing someone to make such a drastic opinion. That is my point. You're purposefully ignoring that fact and making it out like I'm supporting a specific decision.

-2

Anonymous #13 7w

Not talking to you anymore, pipe down. You are also ignoring my point.

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Your point is ignorant and stupid from lala land where everything is perfect and nothing goes wrong: AKA what you have argued isn’t grounded in reality at all 🥳

0

Anonymous #8 7w

Triplets are not pets like wtf. Just cuz u want a kid doesn’t mean u can put one out in this world and say fuck them and whatever happens to them. If ur not ready it’s the most selfish thing to have children.

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

i didn’t push anything i said its risky (scientific evidence) and I personally would not do it, but IT IS STILL HER CHOICE. literally stfu

0

Anonymous #13 7w

You're ignoring my argument yet again. That or you are genuinely stupid. My point is stop trying to push people into making a decision, especially through emotional manipulation based on hypotheticals. There is nuance to every situation so quit pretending it's so black and white.

-2

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

And you have shit for brains if you think carrying three babies isn’t a major risk to life.

3

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

and you’re ignoring my point. i didn’t push anything, i gave my opinion and you think that’s pushing an agenda🤦🏾‍♀️ what part of her choice are you not understanding. you seem like the stupid one to me

5

Anonymous #2 7w

You've provided no scientific evidence. You're making that point to push a specific narrative and ultimately, a decision. That is just as bad as pro-lifers. A common pro-life argument is how abortion is hard on women's bodies and can possibly kill them as well. You're doing the same thing just flipping the script. It's hypocritical and the fact you can't grasp that is laughable. You are either purposefully ignoring my point or you lack critical thinking skills.

-2

Anonymous #13 7w

Hell yeah brother I would totally support them. If it’s someone’s dream to have a baby, they have every right to, no matter what their circumstances are. If someone outside of the pregnant person gets to decide who gives birth, then we end up with nasty stuff like fascism and eugenics. If someone’s struggling with resources for their kids, we help them. It takes a village dog!!!!

13

Anonymous #13 7w

I never said it wasn't, but it is her decision to make based on her specific circumstances. Unless you've spoken with her physician, don't generalize and claim one decision is universally the best. My point in saying that isn't to push a specific idea but rather point out a major flaw in your argument. You are making assumptions on a subject matter that takes more than assumptions.

-1

Anonymous #2 7w

This person isn’t smart enough to get that I’ve learned. Getting heated enough to question intelligence over an imaginary abort/keep scenario is crazy bro✌️😭 dude will never meet those kids and they’re most likely more invested than the baby daddy. You can’t tell some ppl shit without them taking it personally.

0

Anonymous #13 7w

Nice. Reverting to insults because you know you're in the wrong😂

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

abortion is hard on women mentally, it’s hard physically when it’s done too many times. one abortion vs 4-5+ is two very different things and that’s what you aren’t grasping. abortion isn’t and shouldn’t be used as birth control

1

Anonymous #18 7w

And there’s ppl tryna act like she’ll be fine and everyone is going to jump to take care of her and the babies 😭 she on her own ain’t nobody wanna take care of other ppls kids unless you paying 🤣 and they say she won’t fuck her life up. Like she can keep them but let’s be honest about what that’ll cost her 🤷‍♀️

10

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

just say you’re pro-life💀 like i genuinely don’t understand why you can’t grasp someone saying they wouldn’t do it and why they wouldn’t do it but at the end of the day it’s her body, her choice🤦🏾‍♀️

4

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Wait but you did that first so…

1

Anonymous #13 7w

Well her life as she knows it is automatically over and her options are limited to zero bar winning the lottery or finding a cuck to take care of another man’s kids and provide. This is common sense I’m glad you share my views gang. 🤞🤞🤞

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

and you keep saying there’s no evidence when it’s literally been proven that triplets hell even twins are challenging pregnancies. THAT IS THE EVIDENCE. like i said google is free. GO LOOK IT UP

1

Anonymous #2 7w

Another baseless assumption. I am not pro-life, I am pro-allowing an individual to make a decision based on their circumstances and specific facts presented to them from a doctor rather than pushing for them to make a decision based on generalizations. If her doctor says she is likely to suffer or die from giving birth, then she can, and should be allowed to, make the decision to abort them. Your point is less pro-choice than mine.

-2

Anonymous #13 7w

I wasn't insulting. My point was that my argument is so easy to understand that ignoring it is more probable than actually not getting the point straight up.

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

there’s no way you’re sitting here saying your pro choice arguing against ppl who are actually pro choice😂 good fuck!ng bye bro like i can’t take you serious anymore

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

According to the national institute of health teen mothers are more likely to experience still births, neonatal mortality (dying soon after birth), and infant death. The likelihood also increases as the number of babies being had goes up. So yea, both her and the fetuses are at extreme health risks. I hate to be this way but you must be a man to be so sure of yourself nd so wrong at the same time about pregnancy. Here’s your facts now go argue with the scientists <333

1

Anonymous #2 7w

Where is your proof that I am not pro-choice. My entire argument is that this girl should have the right to make a decision based on her circumstances and the facts that relate to that. The main focus is that she should be able to do that without being pressured to make a specific decision based on the opinions of random people online, her sibling, or anyone that isn't a medical professional. Your argument is that she should get an abortion because triplets are hard to take care of and CAN -

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Your argument doesn’t hold up in nuanced reality though

1

Anonymous #2 7w

POSSIBLY (not for sure) cause harm to her. That is baseless assumptions and manipulating the facts of this situation to push towards a specific decision. That is NOT pro-choice😂

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Yeah ngl this is all irrelevant at the end of the day we’re arguing morality and birthing kids at risk with no way of supporting them to stand on equal footing with the world is a pos thing to do and while it’s her right it doesn’t make it right does that make sense or not??!

6

Anonymous #13 7w

Again, jumping to conclusions based on nothing. I am non-binary, medically a female. What now? Also, your scientific "proof" literally uses the terminology "more likely", not "certainly". Again, pushing for a specific decision to be made based on generalizations. A pro-life generalization is that abortion is hard on women. Does that mean women shouldn't be able to get abortions? You've invalidated your own argument. Goodbye.

-1

Anonymous #2 7w

@wtvtfyournameis3000😂

1

Anonymous #2 7w

Your applying generalized facts to push a specific narrative. Literally what pro-lifers do but alright.

2

Anonymous #2 7w

It's butt fucker three thousand, address me properly.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

do you hear yourself rn😭 like this is actually giving me second-hand embarrassment. “your making a baseless accusation” when multiple doctors themselves have seen and said this🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️ but wait didn’t you just say that wasn’t scientific evidence… does that mean they aren’t doing their jobs?

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 7w

Would you get in the car with a drunk driver even though they are only 2-4x more likely to crash and kill you? Didn’t think So. Point invalidated. XoXo

0

Anonymous #2 7w

Again, you are applying this evidence to a circumstance that you know nothing about. You are doing that to push for a specific decision. I am NOT attempting to push for a specific decision. Having triplets may or may not be what is a better choice for her medically.

0

Anonymous #13 7w

That's a false analogy. A generalized increase in medical risk isn't the same thing as knowingly riding with a drunk driver. The comparison ignores the context that a physician evaluates a specific patient's risk, not just population averages.

1

Anonymous #8 7w

I never said we should force her to abort I don’t know where that came from, but we should be honest with ourselves when we are making selfish decisions that put defenseless beings at risk. Why should I support someone’s stupid decision just because that’s what they wanted to do and now they won’t handle it responsibly?

-1

Anonymous #5 7w

No, no. There is ONE option.

55

Anonymous #19 7w

Technically more than one option but for you there may be only one. She could give the babies up for adoption 🤷‍♀️ or abort them, or keep them, or mix it all together kind of thing

70

Anonymous #18 7w

Literally I’m just saying like she can keep them but it’s going to completely change everything she knows and most likely ruin any college plans for at least 6 years 😭 gonna have 3 kids nd working at McDonald’s barely scraping by which that’s just sad when it didn’t have to be that way 🤷‍♀️ but I’m evil and apparently pro life for wanting the best for a young girl just starting her life

6

Anonymous #13 7w

Yeah not to mention her children will have no good prognosis on their futures even if the government funds them as freeloaders.

1

Anonymous #11 7w

Someone who actually cares bruh. I would if I could afford kids rn

13

Anonymous #5 7w

adoption is not a solution. children suffer in foster care, most never get adopted. there is only one option

53

Anonymous #22 7w

I understand but it isn’t any of our choices. It’s the girls decision to make. Just reminding her that there are technically different ways to handle it is the only thing you should do.

61

Anonymous #13 7w

It came from the “would you ‘let’ someone have a child if you knew they couldn’t take care of it?” — the ‘let’ implies control over the decision (but all good if that wasn’t intentional.) You don’t gotta support her — hell, I totally agree that an 18 year old having triplets isn’t smart. But if she says the kids are happening, they’re gonna happen whether we like it or not. If it’s hard to support the mom, take all the support you have and show it to the kids. World’s messy, fight with love 🌎🫶

3

Anonymous #22 7w

the foster care system is not the same as adoption btw

60

Anonymous #5 7w

Ha!!!! Keep one Abort one Put one up for adoption 😂😂😂

20

Anonymous #22 7w

adoption does not equal foster care??? theres a chance they could go to a good loving family who has the financial means to support them that maybe cant have a child of their own?? you make it sound like child abandonment which its not. its a choice that expectant mothers make to try to give their child a better life than they have the means to.

27

Anonymous #11 7w

someone defintely will. but its not gonna be me in this economy. i cant even afford to live on my own yet😭 i cant imagine having to support another human being rn

6

Anonymous #22 7w

Children do suffer in foster care and many do not get adopted, but there is one caveat…babies. Babies a lot more couples want, couples can get the parents to sign over parental rights, they don’t miss any moments (can even be part of the pregnancy), and the kids have no attachment to their bio parents like many adopted parents fear with older kids.

21

Anonymous #31 7w

And what happens if the baby is born with any of the hundreds of medical issues newborns can have? No one wants to adopt a baby with costly medical problems. Abortion is such a simple answer but yall are too conservative to admit it

-5

Anonymous #22 7w

I never said anything about abortion, I merely corrected a statement you said about foster care and adoption.

11

Anonymous #18 7w

If she wants them, she can have them. It’s as simple as that. It’s not a question of it being fair. For the record, I’m with you man! My opinion is that she should abort, as kids should have the resources they need to thrive! But nobody has kids un-selfishly. We are mostly brought into the world because someone wanted us, not because someone was ready. If she has all the info and chooses to keep them, she has the right to choose

8

Anonymous #2 7w

Right we should instead kill 3 children because the parents willingly did something they knew could have this outcome when they knew they couldn’t support children

0

Anonymous #32 7w

the children arent alive to be killed bruh, they are cells. chill

12

Anonymous #22 7w

What defines life? You are cells. As are every single living thing ever. Even single-cell organisms are “alive.” At what point does a child become “alive” for you?

-3

Anonymous #22 7w

this is a terrible fucking opinion and brings down the pro choice movement. any choice is valid and there are private adoption agencies with stricter regulations on foster homes. just because it wouldn’t be your choice, doesn’t make it any less of a choice for families not prepared to welcome a child into their lives.

19

Anonymous blellow_couch__lamp43 7w

Yeah exactly, there are private adoption agencies with stricter regulations So the choices are keep and raise the child, or give for adoption. The end

2

Anonymous #32 7w

go worry abt those kids that are already here in the system instead of trying to mind other ppls cooch

10

Anonymous #10 7w

Why does it matter to op is what I’m saying, I’m not debating if it’s right or wrong but rather why ops opinion has anything todo with their sisters life

3

Anonymous #37 7w

That’s what I said! I’m still crossing my fingers for a 2-for-1 deal at the clinic, but never did get an answer on that one yet…

1

Anonymous #22 7w

yea you're right. abortion is for people who want the easy way out. people who dont give a shit about a human life. you act like having a baby is equivalent to having a plague. and taking a life is "simple". give me a break. you sound absurd.

0

Anonymous #29 7w

That’s not always true. Sometimes people abort a pregnancy because it happened during a violent rape. Other times people abort a pregnancy because it was unplanned and they were living a lifestyle that would be very damaging to a fetus until they found out they were pregnant and they are scared the baby will be brain damaged and developmentally challenged. Sometimes pregnancies are aborted because they were conceived through incest. Sometimes people just aren’t mature enough to raise a child yet

1

Anonymous #34 7w

Do you think there should be an extra charge for murdering a pregnant woman as opposed to the charge for just murdering a regular human? Also do you think that since the baby still can’t survive on its own freshly after being born does that mean it’s still not a human since it’s still completely reliant on others to take care of it?

1

Anonymous #32 7w

It can survive on its own. It has developed organs to sustain life. A woman’s body is no longer needed for survival. An infant is no different from an invalid adult who has no fine motor skills.

3

Anonymous #32 7w

Ok, well, I think just like with an abortion where we have enacted these laws against third trimester abortions, I think we should use the same distinction to decide whether there’s an additional charge for the unborn murdered. If the cutoff for an abortion is at 24 weeks, then that’s where you can start charging the extra murder. The line has to be somewhere, I guess.

2

Anonymous #32 7w

I think there’s a difference between a fetus being literally attached to a woman’s body with a cord and a baby that is an autonomous unit of its own and not physically attached to another person.

2

Anonymous #34 7w

I’m actually not opposed to that. While it’s especially heinous and should be treated as such, I don’t think it should be an additional charge for a non viable fetus.

1

Anonymous #32 7w

I also think I’m being generously sympathetic to pro-lifers and Christians by saying the line drawn might as well be at the third trimester rather than drawing it literally at the moment of live birth. I think I understand that the basis for the rule against third trimester abortions was originally more about the safety of the mother than the philosophical question of when exactly does an unborn fetus become an actual baby. And so as long as that line is already there in most states, it makes…

3

Anonymous #6 7w

What about abortion?

2

Anonymous #32 7w

Who really goes around assuming if they accidentally get pregnant it’s gonna be triplets? That almost never happens. Also, sometimes condoms fail. That means despite any precautions taken, it’s still possible to slip one (or three) past the goalie and face an unplanned pregnancy. I don’t particularly appreciate your addition of the “when they knew they couldn’t support children” component of your remarks either. That’s pretty haughty, don’t you think? Are we going to start running the financials

1

Anonymous #41 7w

If you take a baby and cut its umbilical cord and lay the baby on a table and leave it will not survive. It needs other people to take care of it till it can physically care for itself. That is essentially the same amount of need for other humans as a fetus developing in the womb. In the womb the mother eats more food to help grow the baby. When the baby is born the mother produces milk to continue to feed the baby. If life doesn’t begin at conception then at what point does it begin?

1

Anonymous #32 7w

You’re oversimplifying the situation. Can’t there be different forms and phases of life? It’s just black or white to you? Are we going to count jerked off sperms as lives? Unfertilized eggs? And if we do that, I guess we have to start thinking about yeast and bacteria and fungal growths as individual lives too. Where does it end then? I don’t know why people think we HAVE to fit everything into just two black or white categories. In this case you’re hung up on a false dichotomy. Knock it off.

5

Anonymous #34 7w

A vast majority of pro lifers agree that when the mothers health is in serious risk of death to continue the pregnancy than abortion is on the table. Doesn’t mean we think people should be able to have abortions because they just don’t want it for x, y, z reason. If your so quick to abort an unwanted pregnancy just bc you don’t want a baby than you shouldn’t be having intercourse period

1

Anonymous #32 7w

OH YEAH, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT ONE, BUDDY!!! How ya gonna enforce THAT???

1

Anonymous #34 7w

If a medical professional says “you’re gonna die if you continue your pregnancy” then they can order an abortion for you just like any other general operation or medical treatment. Think of it like a doctor telling you that you need to remove a kidney so then you have it removed, you don’t just go remove it without consultation of a doctor bc you decide you just don’t want a kidney anymore

5

Anonymous #32 7w

Unfortunately not in Texas a judge has to so if that’s the case they’ll get sepsis and die

1

Anonymous #2 7w

Listen, idiots, kids fuck around. And kids get pregnant. Don’t we consider kids under a certain age as unable to legally consent to sex with adults? Hmmm? As in statutory rape laws? So, that means when two underage minors fuck each other, they weee both technically not able to properly consent. And yet it happens regardless. Whining about how some underage teenagers failed to consider the logistics of raising a baby to adulthood when they had sex at summer camp is pretty futile, dontcha think?

1

Anonymous #22 4w

So you wish that any friends you have that were adopted, were aborted instead? Because if that were true then no kid should risk foster care and should just be aborted so they wouldnt exist

1