Hey so you’re a psychopath! Maybe a sociopath! You keep disagreeing in the comments trying to bend norms and morals but you attempted murder and tore a dead persons eyeball out! As well as a whole criminal record it seems. You’re not normal and you need therapy! ChatGPT is NOT therapy! Get some fucking help!
You tried to poison your mom and stepdad? With antifreeze? Which was admittedly intended to kill the man? And you don’t see anything wrong with that action or any reason why people might assume you’re sociopathic in some way or how that would fit the description of sadistic? And you removed your grandma’s eyeball a few hours after she died just out of curiosity and got annoyed that your mom told you to put it back??
You're getting a lot of unfair flak for writing an autobiography and I'll even go so far as to say that the grandma thing, while incredibly odd and disturbed for most people, doesn't necessarily harm anyone. You've confessed to quite a few other crimes of fortunately pathetic success but your biggest crime is most certainly how god damn insufferable you are. You'd be better served asking GPT how to talk to other people and how to not write like a 13 year old who desperately needs to touch grass.
may Allah guide you towards the right path. i’m sorry but what you’re admitting is actually disgusting. it’s seriously disturbing and you need help. i’m not going to diagnose you, but i will definitely let you know this is very abnormal and i wouldn’t be surprised if you ended up behind bars one day
At first I giggled and was like yeah it’s probably just the robot over exaggerating the actions of an autistic person or something because it can’t comprehend complex concepts of sociability but then I read the comments and I’m genuinely concerned and encourage you to speak to a professional before majorly fucking up your life or others 😭
Im so drink rn but im reading this and im like what the fuck is wrong with you anf why Re you poeting about it on yikyak yk that if someone really wants they can tie this back to you right and im bot even talking you you im talking to everyone else cause you don deserve anyone to talk to you you shouldnbe in solitary confinement
I don’t know if the original context disappeared or if it’s just buried in here, but I don’t understand how you could possibly pull out an eye, have your mom notice, and then just continue life like nothing happened. That’s the type of thing that lands you in therapy and destroys family relationships
hey if this is rage bait, then it worked. please don’t do this again. if it’s not, the stuff about you mocking/bullying overweight people genuinely breaks my heart, especially bc you’re trying to pretend like you’re a hero in the eating disorder situation. i don’t know what to say that would make you want to listen, but idk just please don’t do that and try to have some empathy for other people.
I mean, if it’s for sale, people will usually pick up an autobiography of a famous or meaningful person ofc. But an autobiography is just a biography of oneself written by oneself, it’s not reserved for any specific type of person. Either way, who cares, its not for sale so no point getting hung up on semantics, they’re not purposefully tricking anybody or something. They’re doing it as a hobby.
The added context made it worse and I see where AI is coming from actually… Kind of sounds like you attempted to seriously harm somebody because you didn’t like them/their relationship! Unless there’s some serious context missing I’m shocked how you don’t see this as morally questionable. And it reads like rage bait Reddit incel manifesto :(
I genuinely think you are either sociopathic/or psychopathic or have some type of cluster B personality disorder. You have grandiose ideas that you’re important enough to have an autobiography worth reading, you hurt people on purpose. The reason I think you might have autism is because of your delusions and you clearly lack social skills and insight.
But it genuinely seems like you may benefit from talking to somebody more professional and not arguing for the sake of arguing on a Sidechat comment section. There are therapists out there for cheap, there are ones that take insurance. Either way, it’s for your health and the health of the people around you.
In what way is me saying that there are accessible options dramatic? You wrote an entire autobiography on your life and posted it on here for attention. Now you’re arguing in a Sidechat comment section with multiple people telling you your behavior is not healthy towards others around you (if what you wrote is indeed true)
Using writing to romanticize harmful behavior is not intellectual. Your work falls short on the philosophical aim you were likely trying to reach. Instead it reads as deeply unwell and/or attention-seeking. Deflecting concern by calling others dramatic and asking me to „define edgy” is classic deflection to avoid self-reflection. So maybe let’s go with „Someone who thrives on disturbing others and mistakes shock value for depth” instead?
Those are relevant questions so I can have a foundational understanding of the point that you’re trying to make😭 Now, I don’t think this was an exercise of “romanticism.” It was more an explanation of my thought process at the time (as previously likened to a stream of conscious style). Maybe it’s only being interpreted as such because I could just be romantic or philosophical in my verbiage-
You didn’t post the entire autobiography here, you posted snippets of AI’s comments on it confused on how it got to that conclusion. Then you posted excerpts. Now other people are telling you they understand where AI is coming from or that your current behavior is seeming attention-seeking, narcissistic, or likely exaggerated. And your arguing lacks any real points or substance, they read like somebody who just learned the word „fallacy” and likes to argue in circles because they’re bored.
I think your latter point is interesting because the AI also said it think I was intentionally disturbing and traumatizing people to “gain control” and “belittle their trauma by relishing how it’s something I wouldn’t be traumatized by” and then it went on an essay about linkage to specific forms of child abuse I described. Either way, I thought that was a fascinating angle that I hadn’t previously considered-
Sometimes it’s okay to try to physically harm other people for selfish reasons, whether that’s through poison, stabbing, or otherwise? You lack empathy and are rationalizing violence, or are using pseudo-intellectual rhetoric to try and test societal boundaries in the majority of what you are saying. This is not normal and not just „subjective” but a disregard for other people’s safety…
As unbiased of a review as you can get tbh because it’s a robot that doesn’t know it’s you in the text, saying the person in the writing is exhibiting problematic behavior. This you say you’re bothered by, yet make fun of it for being a dumb robot anyway. Then a real human says the same thing, you say you’re not bothered by this, though it’s not a dumb robot. What? 😭
Okay, you’re on the right track: the unbiased response of the robot is why I’m like “omg wtf?” But it is a robot, with a limited understanding of the nuance that makes my actions more justifiable. You people, who have *not* read the book also don’t have an understanding of the nuance in question because you - haven’t read the book!
so with both a unbiased artifical intelligence and actual human intelligence telling you that you’re messed up (in which if you truly didn’t care about a human opinion why post this on a AITA) what’s the end goal here what’s the point of all this and no saying you like to argue doesn’t cover it
Honestly it’s probably them bored or it’s rage bait. I’ll give it a 4/10 rage bait. They’re hyperfocused now on saying that it’s simply because context is lacking as we’ve not read the book. But every added context that’s an attempt to make it seem better makes it seem worse. Also, 90% of my issue is with the deflecting comments on this thread, not the text itself.
you need actual help. it's not funny or unserious. i don't know why you put this out. probably for attention. you're probably feeding off of this negative attention and you're probably feeding off being called cruel and sick and laughing about it. but i hope there's something inside of you that's a human fucking being and realizes you need actual help.
that doesn’t really answer anything yet again. What information/opinion would you truly take to heart as valid besides your own thoughts. Me sure yeah i can understand the dissonance of social media to me but what about your actions that were in person and hands on harm directly to someone you can see with your own eyes. Is there anyone that you would actually listen too regarding this stuff?
The discussion doesn’t go anywhere because I don’t need it to. It wouldn’t be hard for me prove everything I’ve said and more- but I’m A. not doxxing myself to satiate the curiosity of you clapping seals, and B. I’m sure a handful of you would still twist yourself into pretzels to say the proof isn’t real because you just can’t imagine someone as unbothered as me existing❤️ It’s not really my fault you choose to restrict yourself like that lmao
Definitely going in circles. It’s entertaining but it’s also a blurry line between silly drama and something that should be taken seriously. If it’s a stupid hot take, drama, or controversy that’s one thing. But any mention of physically harming family and friends with not much care should probably be taken seriously by default just in case. I’m saying this as somebody that’s aware it’s 99% likely rage bait though.
Attention. External validation. Some sort of cluster B histrionic type gets on here and embellishes true stories, lies about others, to hopefully get a reaction something along the lines of “wow this person is interesting and incredibly intelligent, they exist outside of traditional morality”
Wrong, wrong, wrong (source: the robot). According to the psychoanalysis, “the protagonist doesn’t need external validation, in fact, he couldn’t care less what others think, as he thinks moral consensus is inherently flawed. Instead, he seeks internal validation, constantly proving to himself that his intellectual rationality makes him superior to any other thought process.” Like ou, why are you clocking my tea like that, Mr. robot? I wasn’t expecting to be attacked like that this evening…
Yes, this is true, I did say I was disregarding the bot’s feedback as lacking in nuance, howeverrrrr… that doesn’t mean I didn’t wasn’t at least interested in hearing it out, the same way I’m interested in listening to you guys out, and we’ve established how I feel about you guys lmao
The main point is that you’ve hurt others and show no remorse, don’t believe your actions are wrong or deviant or unjust, whether it’s an AI or multiple humans saying it. You say you’d only take serious advice from a bff, however, you may actually benefit from opening up that circle to more unbiased opinions, especially a professional. It’s not simply being “interested in hearing it out” if you’re unserious about it. We mean talking to somebody that understands you seriously.
you’ve established repeatedly that you simply don’t care about these online comments at all “just sentences” nor the bots like multiple times in a variety of ways to different people commenting but now all of a sudden you hint that you’re taking a bit of it into consideration idk man talking it out to someone that even just acts like they care can do a lot more for you
Well, if you’d read the book, not only would you know that I haveeeee (court mandated) You didn’t even need to read the book, you just needed to read the screenshots you all have been citing as proof that when an AI can see I’m being manipulative because in TWO examples it gives of being “manipulative,” it references me being a specialized facility full of “licensed professionals” that were specialized in this exact field, and that I “mocked” and “manipulated” the staff there- gasp I know,
Maybe you think most people do those things or want to in some way but those thoughts and behaviors you wrote about are not normal to experience. Touching a dead body willingly isn’t normal for a person, let alone removing their eyeball. You truly sound like a sociopath who is unable to feel the full range of emotions and can’t comprehend that other people don’t feel the same.
This is not meant to insult you, but as a completely honest assessment of your writings you showed. Being a sociopath is something at happens biologically for some unknown reason, it’s not your fault that you are like this but you do have to be aware of it and find out how to handle those gaps in emotions and the understanding of it. You should talk to a doctor about this or at least try to find self help information.
ASPD is the actual diagnosis you might receive after talking with a doctor. If you look up on psychcentral.com “antisocial personality disorder” you can find a helpful article going into a lot of details that can walk you through it and even provides some self screening you could do just to see if you are more likely to show the common symptoms.
Remorseless just means without remorse, describing someone who has not experienced remorse (towards a specific situation or in general). You have to currently posses remorse for “remorseless” to be inaccurate. Any other meaning or implication you apply to the word doesn’t equate to the definition.
I would say it’s just a descriptive word, an adjective. All descriptive words are important for clinical use to help describe and explain what someone else is feeling or how they are behaving. It’s doesn’t have its own clinical definition because it’s not something specific to doctors or its own diagnosis, just an adjective used to describe something. Do you disagree with the definition of remorseless?
Well, that’s okay if it’s terrible bait because it’s not bait, but I digress. I think the answer may lie within part of the AI’s response where it says it infers that “the protagonist’s” mother is sociopathic and narcissist and that her actions likely had a direct role in shaping my own amorality. I suppose we can chalk it up to idiosyncratic family dynamics😗
you literally removed your dead grandmother's eyeball. you couldn't just let her rest in peace? like you literally violated her dead body and don't see any issue with that. and then poisoning your parents was just funny haha for you. they could've lost their lives. and having no remorse about it is honestly terrifying
I mean I think she was going to rest either way. Sometimes you just have to take opportunities as learning experiences. You may be shocked to know my grandmother didn’t even complain after the fact- Lastly, the parents thing makes more sense in context, but I’ll spare you the details
is your family christian? because from religious perspective it’s completely disrespectful. even from a secular perspective it’s weird af, you’re literally talking about removing an organ from your grandma’s dead body. if a doctor what you did, they would be charged with a criminal offense
I understand that may have been your take away, but veracity aside, your take away being that this connects to social acceptability is a demonstrably untrue statement; many areas of society, (e.g. corporate, political, military) show that they reward not not carrying about people’s beliefs, feelings, or well-being😂
i don’t agree with what those corporations, politicians, and militaries are doing. you can see in real time how it’s destroying community and ruining the environment. i’m not talking about organizations anyway, i’m taking about your behavior as an individual. the excerpts you posted clearly describe abnormal and deviant stuff going on
i dont get wym by that. i’m probably not gonna keep going back and forth though, there’s no point when i’m coming from an emotional and moral perspective and your mind works differently. sorry for how harsh i’ve been, but this is the most alarming thread i’ve read on this app and i’ve read a lot of alarming threads
i don’t see any types of empathy here, at least in the two excerpts in this thread. from what i can tell, it called you a narcissist because you seem to make situations entirely about yourself, like with your grandmother dying. it’s a matter of respect and empathy to not pull her literal eyeball out (i’m saying this based off of what i know so far, i know im missing context). however, you seemed annoyed your mom was (understandably) upset about it (saying she had a stick up her ass???)
i’m confused what you’re trying to show with this 😭 i understand people have different grieving processes, but i feel like saying your mom had a stick up her ass about you pulling your grandma’s eyeball out both completely contradicts the understanding you seem to show about people having different grieving processes and again, lacks empathy of how she would have been feeling at the time. i get you were curious, but i feel like that was a time to have some self control for the sake of others
also i have had my share of unsavory moments when i was younger and i am trying to give you as much benefit of the doubt as possible, but literally attempting murder multiple times i feel like is valid for people (and ig ai) to seriously question. i’m not trying to say your a bad person, but i hope you at least acknowledge the stuff you did is seriously wrong, which from your replies it seems like that’s not happening
Like bro I’m autistic and work with autistic minors so I know some people would describe a lot of us like that and figured you could be in the same boat but jfc nobody I’ve ever met has gone as far as genuine attempted murder or desecration of a corpse 😭 respectfully you’ve got something majorly wacky going on
there’s no fucking way this is a real conversation lmfao, you desecrate a body and your mom remembers the sound over anything else? You’re trying to say you removed an eye without popping it without any medical tools or knowledge? and then got it back into the socket? the funeral director didn’t do anything about it?? Made up story or not, this is a weird, intentionally psychotic story for attention. YTA.
Remembering the sound isn’t even crazy 😭 if you’ve ever been around something you found truly disturbing the weirdest details will stand out like I grew up in domestic abuse and the most vivid memories are just sensory stimuli mainly sounds scents and tastes. It honestly makes it more believable because that’s just how the human memory functions best
her healing journey??? she looks great now??? eating disorders may make you lose weight but they do NOT make you healthy. I was both the lightest and the sickest when my anorexia was at its worst. Please think about what you say to people in the future. Words have impact. Eating disorders can ruin lives.
Ok last post then I’m deleting this app. You need to be institutionalized. U are fucking insane and u think ts is funny. “Literally the robot is clocking my tea😂” — u are CRAZYYYYY. this is NOT funny or a meme or a joke this is a REAL thing that u did and think is FUNNY. WHAT IS WRONG WOTH YOU.
I just think you have to look at the actions through a different lens; take the eyeball thing. For example an estimated 95% of the ocean is unexplored. If presented the opportunity, who wouldn’t explore it? Also consider how infrequently you really get to see the anatomy of an eye laid out in person. In that moment, with the eye, it was as if I was exploring that 95%, expanding my epistemology in a way few take the opportunity to. I don’t think there’s anything wacky about😗
Well I would not explore the ocean because it scares me 🧍🏻 ethical autopsy of a corpse that was consented to prior to death I would be intrigued by but I would never disrespect the dead by doing something they weren’t informed of and okay with before death. The disregard of autonomy is the wacky part. Take advantage of learning opportunities not lives
You poor thing, I think you’re mistaken - I believe that morality’s subjectivity makes it a tenuous cornerstone for any argument, therefore other people’s perceptions of what is “good” and “bad” isn’t really something I factor into my decision-making. The point of that isn’t to be performative at all, actually! I was just sharing how the AI gave me a silly response lol. No, this wasn’t an exploration into the intricacies of how AI works, but I knew someone would come with the “AXCHUALLY!🤓” take
Lastly, I don’t think I have a problem making and maintaining meaningful relationships - I think the people in my life know what time it is. You seem to be operating under the erroneous notions that A. my typical disposition is incredibly off-putting and B. that I wear my most divisive politics on my sleeve. Did you fail to consider there’s a reason this is being posted anonymously?
If you weren’t insecure about your “mental facilities” I don’t think you would obsessively argue about it with strangers online, so you’re revealing that you are aware of a problem, you just use this narcissistic-intellectualism as a front to avoid accountability when the answer is right in front of you. Its pretty obvious, and hopefully someday you’re self aware enough to get yourself some help because it seems like whatever you’re doing right now isn’t working very well for you.
no way i’m still getting notifications on this thread. you’re disturbed and you deserve to be in jail for attempted first degree murder and harassment. i’m so sick of how it is easy for people like you to roam our streets, all yall do is corrupt society and cause suffering. at the bare minimum you need to be on a watchlist
I didn’t even see your dissertation under #26’s comment lmfao, relax. Since you’re clearly invested though, I should remind you - you have a very limited window of insight into my interpersonal relationships (obviously, you’re a stranger), and so it makes since that you just don’t get it. It’s okay! Relax, take a breather maybe, and yes, I typically do see this specific brand of condescension in overweight individuals, but maybe you’re an outlier! Nothings impossible lmaoooo
I don’t know about your other point though, maybe I’ve just deconstructed morality as a concept on a fundamental level. Again, it’s okay that you’re not operating on that level of abstraction - it’s not like you’re an epistemologist or a philosopher lmao. You’re actually, weirdly, making assumptions about how I interact with others based on how I interact with you? Consider that I don’t like you, or “people” like you, and I think it’d be funny to watch you ooze out in a bathtub-
Oh no pls my commenter #43 don’t don’t clobber meeeeee! :( Moving right past that, we’ve already established that my worldview is more abstract than yours, consequently, I can see how there is nuance to be accepted on either side, which enables me to have my cake and eat it too. Red velvet is my favorite flavor.💋 You might see inconsistency, but I see expansion 😗
Oh I didn’t say I’d do it, it just said it’d be funny to watch it happen. Maybe you can send me some videos after you start cutting- Anyway, is it flawed, or do you just disagree with it? Your entire argument hinges on “murder is bad because it causes harm” I’m just saying it’s bad to you and not to me because I subscribe to a different ideological framework in which my actions make sense to me. Hope this helps❤️
inviting others to do the same? deadass trying to spread corruption. you’re not even doing it well, you’re airing out your psycho mindset to everyone like it’s supposed to be normal 😭 just because your emotional intelligence is lower than a newborn’s, and empathy, ethics, and boundaries are foreign concepts for you doesn’t mean they’re not fundamental or not necessary
Religion is my favorite exercise of intellectual laziness - like wdym if you turn the other cheek an invisible man in the sky will reward you? That’s all it takes to get pacify you? That’s not even a verifiable claim? Now you’re just gonna get slapped again and keep turning the other cheek. It’s like self-flagellation or a slow suicide. Just hit them back, like damn?
Oh, so *you* are the arbiter of which classifications are valid, and which ones aren’t, not me, and not psychiatrists. I see, I see! Moving on, moralities that aren’t based on religion still aren’t biological constructs, and so they’re not real restrictions on our existence. Even the “moral” frameworks that (claim to) operate independently of religion (a la the law) still don’t really carry the moral weight people think they do…
nah, that’s a lame hypothesis that only someone with aspd or narcissism can come up with. most people experience empathy for others and because of that, they comprehend the other things i listed like boundaries and ethics 👍 obviously to different extents, but there’s at least common ground or else society wouldn’t be functional. you’re just spouting off a clearly extreme, deviant way of thinking. your intellectualization of it gives edgy teenage boy too it’s cringey af
Do they, though? Or do they only pretend to? You have so much empathy, but how many homeless people have you driven by on the street without giving money to? What have you done to help abused children? You interpret me acknowledging that not only don’t I care about “empathy”, but you likely don’t either as a sign I fit into some arbitrary label designed to ensure a psychiatrist gets paid lmfao
See you do get it! That is what I’ve been saying! And no, witnessing death only is considered a negative experience due to socialization and taboos - the only biological component to this argument is the mind recognizing that there may be bacterial health risks to staying in the presence of corpses, or a concern that whatever killed the other person may also kill you. This isn’t a moral thing, it’s a survival one
pseudointellectual ahh argument. i pay zakat and donate to my homeland when i have enough money, i’m not exactly swimming in cash but i know i have privilege by living here in america. the people you’re talking about that feign empathy to such a high degree would fall under aspd, narcissism, or potentially autism. we are a social species and we have relied on community since our existence. if everyone thought like you, culture would be impossible to foster and civilization wouldn’t exist
That’s because your side is based on some morality which we’ve established is a concept I find subjective and tenuous- I do know exactly what study you’re referencing, and had you not only been interested in using it to reinforce your own worldview, you would’ve considered the criticisms of methodological errors arose in response to it, but you didn’t, did you?
So I take it you learn learned about how subsequent large scale replicas failed to reproduce the same results? Or how there were concerns that the sample size was too small or that the researchers had accidentally cued the babies on which puppet to choose? Notwithstanding all of that, this is still only circumstantial evidence that doesn’t prove babies have a “moral sense”
it’s a black and white argument. i never said i was an empath, i simply said you lack empathy. you’re also implying that because you have not given money to every homeless person you’ve seen or know of any domestically abused kids, that one doesn’t have empathy? and then saying this is equal to attempted murder or bullying, that’s more than just a false equivalence, that’s insane
Is it really that different though? If either way you do nothing, what material difference does having empathy have? How is it even real beyond a performance or an affirmation that you tell yourself? Is leaving someone to starve or freeze to death on the streets when you could intervene not an act of violence by proxy?
empathy exists on a scale, most people would not leave someone to starve or freeze on the streets if it’s someone they know, and a lot of people would open their doors to a friend of a friend. reason most people don’t open their doors to strangers is because of danger. there are also a lot of different ways you can engage in altruism. outside of altruism, being able to connect with others is important to our survival as a species
no it doesn’t mean it’s selective, it means it exists on a spectrum. most people fall in the middle, empaths fall on the high side, and aspd/narcs fall on the other end. i don’t know why you keep trying to argue about my empathy, you’ve made it clear you don’t feel any remorse over attempted murder along with other things. comparing doesn’t even make sense because you’re trying to create an equivalence where a normal person perceives a big gap. lacking empathy causes obvious dysfunction