Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Just found out my current gf lied to me about her sexual history after she gave me an STI/STD scare at the beginning of our relationship. She had literally fucked her ex the weekend prior, but tried to blame it on a random hu she had a month before. (1/?)
upvote 71 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

At the time, we weren’t officially together, but we spent a lot of time acting like a couple. Now it’s months later and I’m just now finding out about all of this. Would I be TA to confront her about this even though over 5 months have passed? Do I even have the right to be angry rn?

upvote 37 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

If she knew that she had something and still slept with you after the fact. You can actually sue her for negligence and battery

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Leave

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Get out man

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Leave that ho (respectfully) you deserve better

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Gave you and STD scare right off the jump, lied about her past, the writing’s on the wall dawg just leave

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

damn that burns, you better get out of there

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Isn’t that a crime? I’m sorry that happened to you

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 15w

Leave and never look back

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

No fs that violates your health

upvote 54 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

Confronting her is the bare minimum. I’d honestly consider leaving at this point

upvote 54 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

She lied, put your health at risk, and even if you weren’t together, fucking her EX while y’all were hooking up is weird as fuck. You have every right to be pissed

upvote 31 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

Speaking from experience, get out.

upvote 25 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

just leave bro

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15w

For the love of god leave her bro. That is definitely a microcosm of bigger things. Fucked her ex the week before?? You deserve better

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 15w

Only if he actually gets an std

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 15w

And the other person has to be aware of said std. it’s only illegal if they have prior knowledge and not disclose it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 15w

Not entirely true. If you knowingly have an std and don’t disclose it, and don’t take the proper safety measures to prevent giving it to someone, it’s possible you can be convicted on assault charges (as in it has happened), even if the other person didn’t actually get it. Also lying about consent altering information is grounds for assault charges. Civil liability is when it’s difficult to prove when the other person didn’t get infected

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15w

That’s assuming the person admitted to having prior knowledge. If they have no knowledge of an std and transmit it, then they aren’t legally liable. It unfortunately isn’t illegal to not get consistent testing when sexually active

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 15w

Also it might be a good idea to get tested again, if she was lying then she could be lying now, you don’t want to have contracted anything in the meanwhile without realizing

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 15w

I agreed with that part yes. And again liability is for civil suits, criminal law is a bit different. So correct it’s [currently] not criminal if they also didn’t know [in any jurisdiction I’m aware of]. I am curious if there’s been any cases arguing a sexually active person has the legal obligation to test themselves before engaging with a new partner (and is thus liable for risk of transmission even when they don’t know)

upvote 2 downvote