Anonymous #1 1w

Kinda backwards to say anyone from a certain group deserves to die Then also call them a nazi no?

-6

Anonymous #2 1w

How is it backwards… if that’s what they identify as. This is why they are proud to march around spreading hate. Grow a pair.

57

Anonymous #1 1w

Sorry, when did Kirk identify as a “Nazi”

9

Anonymous #3 1w

Sorry when did I say Kirk was a “nazi”

38

Anonymous #3 1w

well hitler said he was a socialist so he’s actually a good guy ass comment. do you think people need to say it out loud for it to be true?

19

Anonymous #1 1w

Well this conversation is about Kirk, and you said Nazis deserve to die…

3

Anonymous #7 1w

They said the word “identifying”

4

Anonymous #3 1w

nice rebuttal. sorry people aren’t perfect when they’re typing on a tiny screen fueled with rage against a facist

4

Anonymous #10 1w

Are you talking about me or things you’ve seen in general? Cause my post doesn’t mention glorifying what happened or a widow and orphaned kids.

17

Anonymous OP 1w

In general and some of the replies

5

Anonymous #10 1w

Gotcha

8

Anonymous #13 1w

No one deserves to be killed. And especially not infront of their family.

49

Anonymous #1 1w

You literally commented under a post about Charlie Kirk and then said “any far right n@zi 100% deserves to die” lol incase you forgot

1

Anonymous #18 1w

Yes the post references Charlie Kirk indirectly but the post says they don’t believe anyone should die due to “political views” I said I absolutely disagree because I don’t think those that celebrate the dark history of Germany should be allowed to live. So idk why you’re acting stupid but you should use your context clues like a big boy. If I wanted to call Charlie that directly, I would have but I was responding to the take that all “political views” should be respected.

6

Anonymous #3 1w

No the conversation was about respecting different political views. Obviously it’s indirectly referring Kirk but that’s not what my response highlighted. Kirk was probably that in some ways but I really don’t care what he was because he was a POS regardless. My point was general. Hope this helps!

7

Anonymous #13 1w

as a person who actually got to speak to the man, he was a lot more than a "rage baiter". all the videos online portray him one way but the reality is that he believed in our generation. i understand a lot of people don't align with his political views and that's okay but to some people he was the voice who gave them the courage to speak up for what they believe in and to not be afraid to be their authentic self out of fear of being disliked.

83

Anonymous #10 1w

Hate speech is not protected under the Constitution but is under tRumpistan dictatorship.

10

Anonymous #23 1w

Hitler caused genocide, Mr Kirk shared his political opinions around the us

9

Anonymous #24 1w

Hate speech and inciting violence is not “political opinion”. kkkirk does not deserve mourning. He signed that away when he abandoned his humanity.

40

Anonymous #21 1w

Can we stop classifying racism and bigotry as “political views.” Those have nothing to do with politics and everything to do with your character. You can feel empathy for him but do not chalk his bigoted view points down to “politics” because this is why people feel okay saying the most vile shit about minorities, because they can hide behind saying that “it’s just politics” so they don’t have to face any accountability for what they are saying.

75

Anonymous #17 1w

literally this.

5

Anonymous #17 1w

If that’s their true character they can’t be saved.

8

Anonymous #26 1w

If you’ve ever actually watched him speak, you would know he isn’t racist. He genuinely believe in equality which is why minorities shouldn’t be getting things handed to them.

-12

Anonymous #30 1w

We don’t get anything handed to us. Never have and never will. It’s a coping mechanism because we’re getting jobs whites don’t think we’re capable enough to have. Cope.

55

Anonymous #1 1w

How come there are scholarships only for minorities? Why is the acceptance rate for minorities higher?

-8

Anonymous #30 1w

Be smarter and maybe you’ll get a scholarship

43

Anonymous #30 1w

To be fair you can get scholarships for anything, including being from a (typically) white heritage like Italian or Irish or Jewish etc. And you can get scholarships for being just white if you go to a majority non-White school.

47

Anonymous #11 1w

I did get one for over $80k 😀😀

-4

Anonymous #30 1w

Then why are you sitting here bitching

54

Anonymous OP 1w

True but there are more scholarships for black people and schools wants them there to increase diversity

-6

Anonymous #30 1w

You said there were ONLY scholarships for minorities. That’s not true. There are scholarships for everything and white people can benefit from minority scholarships simply from going to a school where they’re a minority. Also to increase diversity. You’re making it sound like a school is plucking a random black person off the street and giving them a full ride cause they’re black lol.

40

Anonymous OP 1w

Learn to ready buddy. There are scholarships that are only for minorities. They have more scholarship opportunities. I literally said I have a large scholarship.

-10

Anonymous #30 1w

Idk maybe because minorites weren’t allowed to go to college for a good chunk of American history so there were efforts to increase the number which is not the same as “just handing it out”. The same reason they offer scholarships for legacy students or for different sororities or fraternities that no one has a problem with.

36

Anonymous #30 1w

You’re an idiot 😭😭😭

28

Anonymous #30 1w

Yeah I’m black and didn’t get anything like that. So where were the scholarships I get for being black?

14

Anonymous #1 1w

Which had nothing to do with the current generation going to college. Why should they get benefits for something they did not have to go through. Pick a struggle

-8

Anonymous #22 1w

sadly hate speech often is part of extremist political views, which means it is both. but yeah, he didn't deserve to be murdered but he doesn't deserve to be mourned by more than family and those actually close him

5

Anonymous #30 1w

??? Do you understand that the past affects the future????

22

Anonymous #30 1w

Are you stupid??

18

Anonymous #1 1w

Do you understand that no one who is currently alive was a slave or owned a slave??

-6

Anonymous #30 1w

Do you understand that there was segregation and Jim Crow long past slavery?????

34

Anonymous #30 1w

You literally are a fucking idiot. Oh my God

30

Anonymous #30 1w

Slavery didn’t just end and everything was okay????

32

Anonymous #30 1w

Learn to read your own words? There are scholarships only for minorities like there are scholarships only for Jewish people, Italians, people with dwarfism, and racial minorities WITHIN a school that white people can ALSO get. That’s like saying vegans get everything handed to them cause there a vegan dish at a restaurant when there’s also dishes for vegetarians, omnivores, meats eaters, and paleo too

20

Anonymous #1 1w

And did that personally affect you either?

-7

Anonymous #30 1w

YES IT FUCKIN DID

26

Anonymous #30 1w

MY GRANDMOTHER LIVED THROUGH THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AND HER PARENTS MOVED FROM THE SOUTH DUE TO RACIAL TENSION AND LACK OF OPPORTUNITY

25

Anonymous #30 1w

ARE YOU DEADASS???

25

Anonymous #1 1w

And what did that do to YOU personally? How did that make a difference in YOUR future. What did YOU go through to need to play the victim

-7

Anonymous #30 1w

ME PERSONALLY? I WENT THROUGH GETTING CALLED THE N WORD, BEING CALLED OUT IN CLASS UNPROVOKED, PEOPLE LOCKING THEIR DOORS WHEN I WALK PAST, PEOPLE EXCLUDING ME AND MORE

29

Anonymous #30 1w

#30: Nothing bad affected you personally #1: Names how something affected their immediate family directly #30: You’re playing the victim! I get why you like Kirk now

30

Anonymous #30 1w

YOU ARE THE VICTIM SAYING THAT BLACK PEOPLE GET SCHOLARSHIPS TO GO TO COLLEGE

20

Anonymous #30 1w

YOU ARE THE VICTIM THAT THINKS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OPPRESSED WHITES

28

Anonymous #30 1w

YOU ARE THE VICTIM THAT USES YOUR IGNORANCE TO PLAY DUMB AND IGNORE HISTORY

16

Anonymous #30 1w

YOU ARE A WASTE OF SPACE

16

Anonymous OP 1w

Nothing bad affected me personally? In a racial way, no. But in many other ways, yes.

-8

So saying someone else shouldn’t get scholarships based on something you can’t also benefit from isn’t a victim mentality to you. It’s just true. But someone acknowledging their family history (which is also just true) IS a victim mentality.

11

Anonymous #30 1w

Others having equality and equity does NOT detract from the benefits you had handed to you from the start. Also, do you know who Ruby Bridges is? Yeah? She’s still very much alive. As are many of the people who wanted her dead for going to school, who threatened to poison her lunches, who still think Black people don’t deserve to exist in a non-segregated society let alone even be alive. They past that sentiment to many of their kids, and then theirs. This bullshit is STILL harming people.

10

Anonymous #18 1w

tbh minorities in america are killed everyday in front of children/ family so ! after all what has happened these past 6-9 months now ppl wanna talk about “no one deserves to be killed” stfu as if he didn’t make his bed when he opened his mouth

12

Anonymous #32 1w

Yes commenting about a political influencer’s death is an inherently political act whether you’re mourning, celebrating, or neutral. In other news water is still water even when it’s ice or steam.

10

Anonymous OP 1w

Okay but if u agree why did u post this then? Like ur water is water thing applies to ur own post. Not even the staunchest of conservatives are out here saying u should be personally mourning at least that I’ve seen, they’re only responding to public statements of not mourning. Since you agree that’s a different thing you’re arguing with no one.

0

Anonymous #32 1w

Or you just don’t get my point. No one who said they weren’t mourning was pretending they weren’t making a political statement, just like the ones celebrating weren’t. But it seems you think making a political statement about a political influencer is bad? Even though people vocally mourning and saying people shouldn’t announce not mourning is a political statement in and of itself.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

No im just trying to say that you’re shadowboxing. Aka no one is disagreeing with you. I think you’re trying to engage with the argument I outlined earlier in which people would disagree but by not committing to that line you have a more defensible position. However this is either dishonest or just pointless

1

Anonymous #32 1w

A false dichotomy was being presented in these discussions where someone is either vocally celebrating or vocally mourning based on if they think someone should die due to their political views. I’m saying that while I agree no one should die, there’s a third option: That people who disagree with your views don’t have to mourn your death even if they aren’t celebrating it.

7

Anonymous OP 1w

Okay. I see what ur getting at now, thanks for clearing it up.

9

Anonymous #26 1w

Exactly. That or “it’s just words.” Hitler never directly killed anyone. He just had “politics.” Why is racism now a political view? It’s violent hate speech. It’s okay to hate people based on factors they CAN change.

8

Anonymous #24 1w

Idk, man. Saying ‘Hitler caused genocide’ and ‘Kirk just shares opinions’ kind of disconnects ideology from outcome. I mean, genocide didn’t just happen. It was fueled and justified by political ideology - especially one that targeted marginalized groups and spread gradually over time. Hitler’s speeches and rallies weren’t harmless. They were the conduit for building the moral framework that allowed genocide to feel justified - and that’s exactly how Hitler ‘caused genocide’.

4

Anonymous #34 1w

He also had plenty of people “on the ground” who didn’t touch any weapons. A lot of people forget that the Holocaust was not an overnight event. It took YEARS before the camps were opened and gassing and non-stop murder occurred. It took over a decade for them to open and reach the level they did.

7

Anonymous #22 1w

People like julius streicher, for example, didn’t use weapons to cause harm. They spread propaganda, inflammatory rhetoric, and inciting violence. People said he was “just speaking his mind/the truth”, too. He normalised hate. He made it palatable.

8

Anonymous #22 1w

The camps didn’t start or end with Jews, either. Started with Germans associated with the Communist Party of Germany. Then anyone showing resistance. Then the racial profiling picked up more. Then general criminals and “asocial” people (Roma and Sinti, Disabled, Queer, alcoholic, homeless, nomadic, sex worker, interracial couples, etc) were encamped. Many “asocials” who survived were still left in prisons to suffer and be forgotten after the camps were shut down.

7