if she consents to hooking up, is it okay for me to lie about using birth control so that i can discretely get her pregnant (or vice versa for women)? according to you, she gave consent to having sex, which means she also gave consent to having a baby, even though it's by deception
what are you even talking about… people hook up raw and then get pregnant or the condom can break.. ? not everyone is on birth control, if you have sex there is a slight possibility even if you wear protection the woman could get pregnant? sex is still sex trying for a baby or not
If terminating pregnancies is illegal where you live, the burden is arguably on the person who doesn’t intend to keep the child to communicate that in advance. This way their sexual partner can decide in advance if they consent to potentially having to break the law. Access to abortion is a human right, but that isn’t an excuse to be lax about informed consent and ignore the realities of your situation
there is a difference between being alive and then living. i never said it wasn't alive, but being alive and living aren't the same thing. someone who is on life support and can't move, speak or even think for themselves, and is surviving by machines and medicine is technically alive, but they aren't living. they also usually aren't able to make their own decisions.
We simply disagree. A fetus is alive living developing human, and we don’t believe that simply killing it is a right that everyone should have as a form of birth control. Pregnancy is a risk you take whenever you have sex. There’s forms of birth control you can use to lower that risk, but you’re still accepting that risk.
So according to you a fetus is a alive developing human and therefore it's own independent human , but the minute you remove the fetus from the mother it dies. So how can you say it an human when it can't survive outside of the mother's body? Since it's apart of her body until the day the fetus is born. So why don't you think women should have a right to what happens to their body?
you also aren't accounting for non consensual sex. ik that wasn't my question but abortion is a form of birth control that exists. whether or not you agree it should be a right or not. so that's why even someone consents to sex they aren't consenting to be pregnant. plus abortions being illegal won't stop people from having them in unsafer ways. if it didn't exist that be an entirely different story but to act like it doesn't just because you disagree with the morality of it is just wrong.
Non consensual sex doesn’t matter in this context. Obviously if someone was graped, it isn’t the victims fault, but it’s less than 1% of cases. It is a form of birth control, but you do need to consider the morality of it. It’s murdering a human. It’s no different from someone murdering someone outside
The fetus isn't attached, it's a part of the women's uterus. It has been there sitting in her ovaries as an egg her entire life. By your logic everytime a women gets her period it's murdering a human being, since all an egg is an undeveloped human. Why is it when the egg is within the early stages of development all of a sudden has a life outside of the mother? How is it any difference if a mother experiences a miscarriage?
Again, that’s being disingenuous, just being an egg doesn’t mean it’s a human life, there is the potential for it, but it isn’t there yet until sperm comes in contact. That’s like saying dudes commit mass genocide when they jack off. And it’s different bc you can’t control a miscarriage. It’s a chance thing. Abortion is straight up murder
Why does the addition of the sperm change the fact that the egg has been in the women's body her whole life and can't survive without her body? Yes you did mention a newborn child wouldn't survive but it wouldn't die immediately if it was left alone. Anyone can take care of a baby, but fetus will no longer survive once it exists the body.