Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
From my experience, when asked the question “can men and women be friends (purely platonic)?” a lot more women say yes than men. Why do you think that is?
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 12h

I’m a man and I don’t understand how people can say no

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16h

Idk but people who say no are shallow and dumb.

upvote 7 downvote
🛠️
Anonymous 16h

Women are better at making actual emotional connections and men are more sexual.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10h

I’m a woman and they can’t be best friends, one always has an attraction to the other which they express verbally or in confessions

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11h

Firstly, men’s romantic desires and feelings are wayyy less complex than women’s. All a man needs to be attracted to a woman is for her to be decent-looking and feminine. On the other hand, women aren’t attracted to someone “on first sight” and can basically tell themselves internally that “this is a friend, don’t be attracted to him” even if he’s like supermodel material or something.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11h

I also think, unfortunately, that men have less desire to be friends with women than women do with men. It’s not because they dislike women, the way men act with their friends is much, much different than women do with theirs, and so a lot of the “edgy” or “gay” things that men do with each other, they would be in jail if they did that with a female friend. For this reason, I don’t think men view female friends the same as male friends.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11h

With all that said though, I don’t think most necessarily believe men can’t be friends with women, I just think they believe they can’t be friends with a woman the same way they would with a man. I’m more than happy being friends with a woman in not attracted to.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9h

“Way less complex” I honestly think this is very harmful to believe 😭 most of that is patriarchal conditioning imo

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9h

I’m a woman and yes they absolutely can. My best friend is married so I sure hope he isn’t in love with me. If he was I would kick his ass because she’s so good for him and they make each other better people

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9h

I'm a straight man and disagree! While everyone I've crushed on so far is someone I was friends with first, I have many women friends I only see platonically, and I know the same goes for many of my women friends. This take also ignores non-binary, bi, or pan people because by your logic, they can't be friends with anyone or only non-binary people and that's obviously not true.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9h

It’s not about the “patriarchy”, it’s how men naturally are, there’s nothing wrong with it. And who even cares what the reason is, I’m just telling the truth, whether you wanna hear it or not

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9h

I know some men are like that, but that's not true for me. I can only fall for people I know well and have a personality and connection I really admire. I don't care what someone looks like You also act like every guy is straight when there are bi or gay men too

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9h

Typically when people say a plural noun to describe people without “the” or “some” or something like that, they are referring to those people *in general*. I shouldn’t have to explain this, but I’m not saying “all men are the same” when I say that, but the majority of men are like that

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9h

It’s crazy how I didn’t ask and won’t be reading all dat🤭

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9h

I guess for me, maybe it's just the guys I'm surrounded by and know, but this hasn't been what I've seen typically in my guy friends. A lot of them are like me too and tend to value knowing someone well, but I'm sorry. I didn't mean to be pedantic, I just wanted to share what I've noticed/experienced

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 8h

“How they naturally are” oh… that’s just not true. Referring to any one group as being “naturally” *insert generally negative thing* is not a great way to look at the world. I get where your coming from (in therapy and working in my own generalizations of men due to circumstances and events in my life) but it’s still harmful and tbh just ends up re-enforcing the misogynistic box the patriarchy shives men into :/

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8h

So you’re telling me that the patriarchy is why we desire food and water? The patriarchy is why we feel the need to sleep? Some things are just natural, and romantic/sexual feelings are as natural as it gets. Also, why is it negative? Just because it’s different from how women feel about it? Come on now

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7h

I’m not sure what dots your connecting 😭 why would the patriarchy be why we desire food and water that’s not even adjacent to what I said? It’s not inherently negative but it’s *usually, if not always* taken as negative because it reduces men’s capacity for emotion and complex thought to something simple, which imo reduces their humanity AND ability to hold themselves accountable 1/2

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 7h

I get that groups of people can show a general trend of different ways of thinking, but we should then look at *why*: the patriarchy equally rewards and punishes (status for emotional repression) men for simplistic desires and emotions, because anything more than that is seen as degrading (feminine). The CAPACITY for complexity is the same regardless of sex. I think the difference shows up due to conditioning.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7h

Ur so cool by saying I didn’t ask im about to drop to my knees with how epic that was got any more amazing one liners for us or r u gonna reply with another salty comment which will also be ignored

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7h

Are you a man? If not, you don’t get to speak for us. I don’t go around telling you what a period is like, and you don’t get to tell me how I go about with platonic relationships. If you are, you don’t represent the other 4 billion men on this planet and it’s incredibly self centered to assume you do

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7h

Saying it’s our fault because of our gender is like excusing a criminal of their crime because they “just happened to be a man”

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 7h

“And that they couldn’t control themselves because they were a man and those feelings come naturally”

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 7h

That was sarcasm, thought it was obvious but my fault if it wasn’t. The point is, it is natural for the majority of men to be attracted to someone based on looks alone naturally, but you’re saying it’s a patriarchy thing, which I think is stupid, sorry. And “negative” is subjective, maybe it does make a lot of us shallow. Okay, so what? If you don’t like that, find a guy who isn’t shallow.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7h

I understand what I’m saying is unpopular opinion, but I believe it is the honest truth, and I would rather give an honest answer rather than tell people what they wanna hear

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 6h

It… it is a patriarchy thing. We live in a patriarchal society- it is BAKED into the foundation of it, LITERALLY since the invention of agriculture, so yeah it’s gonna affect the behavior of everyone in it because it has a shit ton of really stupid social rules that hurt everybody. We can agree to disagree on this I guess.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 6h

Also I fear even though it was sarcasm, that sarcasm doesn’t fit there? It seems like a nonsensical phrase to me.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6h

Yes agree to disagree because there is no way in my opinion that is true. And as a man I feel like I should know more than you about what is natural and what isn’t

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6h

It makes perfect sense. You’re making a perfectly natural thing into a “patriarchy” thing, therefore I compared it to making other perfectly natural things a patriarchy thing

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 6h

It’s crazy how you can still have basic human decency for people responding. This isn’t a private post and I can make my own comments. You don’t have to read them of course but you also don’t have to be rude

upvote 1 downvote