
Because the first date comes with absolutely no assurance (or even really much reason to believe) that the time/energy/money/hope you invest will be worthwhile. At that point, you donât even know if sheâs remotely interested or if you have any chance at all (lot of women will go on dates for abs no discernible reason). & thats ok, but the trade off is that its unwise to invest too much in a first date. Time and energy are unavoidable, but there exist plenty of cheap or free date options so you C
Why should men want to but not women? Like I think the person who asks should pay, I asked my bf out so I paid, and now we swap bc weâre both in equal financial standing itâs just makes sense. Itâs fine to want what you want but to put it upon the rest of society as an expectation is dumb. You got a bf who meets your desires, why be concerned what other men or women do
pirosnake said his sister has done that which is really shitty of her but she is still one woman who doesn't represent all women. in your experience has a women actually admitted to you that she was just going on a date or flirting with a guy to get free drinks or food? i feel like majority of women when they do that are actually interested in the man. why would they use him for something they could easily just buy themselves
Nah once the nails grow out and you take them off they canât be re-used ( they also are hella uncomfortable), once you shower the hair style is gone (if you got it dyed or sm that stays Oc), makeup is the same (itâs also time consuming), and donât get me started on waxing
Again. Not low standards. I just have different preferences for a relationship. Why do we not feel weird about the fact men still ask for most dates this day and age. Idk Iâm just not fond of tradition nor the people who act like youâre somehow inferior if you donât uphold it. If you want your man to pay for dates thatâs fine, but Iâm tired of the attitude that men HAVE to.
can manage the amount of money you waste. Like it or not, thatâs important and thatâs a reality for any man who isnât disgustingly rich (and if he is, thatâs its own good reason to be stingy). Things are tough out there, men gotta ball on a budget. Itâs prob gotten worse recently due to the rise in ghosting, poor communication, and the social media related push to normalize more exploitative/sociopathic dating behavior among women, so men are reacting by putting their guard up a lot.
Oh. Wish Iâd seen this first. I feel silly for having taken your question as seriously as I did. I thought you were being genuineđ¤Śđťââď¸ Wasting money on stuff he doesnât give a damn about isnât the equivalent of spending money on the other person, so itâs not a âgotchaâ on why he should spend money on you. Thatâs like a man saying âok yes my girlfriend bought me a $100 watch but I just bought myself $200 worth of warhammer minis so whoâs REALLY coming out ahead here?â
i feel like if you view dates this transactional then you wouldn't last in an actual relationship. First date is literally just to get to know the person and its traditionally the job of the gentlemen to pay. Idk why would view that as a waste of money, even if you don't click romantically you got to know a new person.
I would agree that people who view dates as transactional shouldnât be in relationships. But I donât, and you do, donât you? Youâre the one who feels, apparently strongly, that spending money on a woman is a must in order to be allowed to get to know her. What do you call that if not transactional? Especially since, in reality, two people definitely CAN get to know each other for free. Budgeting for dates isnât transactional; itâs rational and reflects the bare minimum of fiscal responsibility.
When men adapt to conditions women control, we arenât really responsible for HOW weâre forced to adapt, we just do. That doesnât mean women are obligated to behave any differently, as long as youâre happy with the outcome. But it does mean how we date is a choice yall mostly made for us, so if you DID want it to be change, youâll want to be conscious of that.
Nothing is wrong with a free date, i didn't say that but traditions are traditions for a reason. you can also apply your logic to basically anything that cost money. you aren't guaranteed to like a movie before you see it in theaters, but that's not what you're paying for. you're paying to see the movie the way the filmmakers intended it to be seen, its an experience. dates imo are the same thing, its not that your paying someone to hang out with you you're paying for the experience.
Well, yeah, you can apply it to other things you can spend money on. Which is why guys mostly spend money rationally. You donât pay to see a movie you arenât optimistic about if you can watch that same move or a better one for free. (Doesnât that answer your original question?) But paying for a date only to get stood up or realize later you never had a chance isnât a valuable experience in any way whatsoever. So if men can minimize the rate of that happening theyâre right to do so.
Depends on what youâre doing. But anyway, for the record, that last sentence makes me want to go absolutely apeshit to the point Iâm immediately institutionalized. But I will instead take the high road and just say Iâm very happy for you that you have the luxury of being that naive, and I do envy it. Just, whatever you do, donât fact check that with anyone who has actually⌠dated women recently.
well i'm a straight woman and i don't become friends with women who would take advantage of someone like that, again all my friends are financially stable and don't need to go on dates just to get free food. if they aren't interested they decline. that's what i would do when i was single, it be a waste of my time as well if i only went on a date for the free food. like if i wanna go to applebees ima take my ass to applebees, why go on a whole date for that.