Anonymous #2 5d

so how are you better or different than a liberal?

7

Anonymous OP 5d

Libs don’t hate

-9

Anonymous #2 5d

Don’t look up the Charlie Kirk and who celebrated his death.

10

Anonymous #2 5d

i don’t think this is always true

11

Anonymous #3 5d

enlighten me, open to dialogue

14

Anonymous OP 5d

If you are under the age of 25 you can’t expect a man to do these things they are still young men and getting their way in life a conservative man after the age of 25 should and will do these things. I’ve been conservative since the age of 16 you can’t just expect young men to grasp these things they need to grow and learn.

-4

Anonymous #3 5d

do you extend the same grace to people who aren’t men? i have no problem giving men grace i just don’t like when only certain people get it

20

Anonymous OP 5d

Grace in what sense? Cause that matters a man learns what a man is through experience so what do you mean by grace.

5

Anonymous #3 5d

grace as in goodwill and patience as someone is learning

11

Anonymous OP 5d

I give everyone grace that’s what Christ tells us to do in that sense but that doesn’t mean you tolerate bs.

4

Anonymous OP 5d

Why do only men (especially white men) need to be granted that goodwill and patience

2

Anonymous #1 5d

Literally no one brought up race and who said only men should be granted grave. You are reading what you want to read

4

Anonymous #3 5d

Maybe so but I also know for a fact the way people take about teenage boys vs teenage girls is very different and the language that we need to let young men figure stuff out lets them get away with being bad people

6

Anonymous #1 5d

They aren’t bad people though just cause they don’t conform to your ideology’s and what you believe in doesn’t make them bad it makes them a normal human being.

1

Anonymous #1 5d

did you mean to respond to #3? i said everyone should be granted grace :)

8

Anonymous #3 5d

what do you consider to be bs?

9

Anonymous OP 5d

Bs in relationship terms?

0

Anonymous #3 5d

i guess? but also just whatever you were referring to by “tolerate bs”

7

Anonymous OP 5d

I personally don’t tolerate, disrespect, dishonesty, cheating, high body counts, etc what you would expect from a Christian conservative man.

2

Anonymous #3 5d

Do you expect a conservative woman to stay a virgin past 25 if she’s still learning how to be a good moral one? Just about none of them would if everyone gave them that grace you’re saying. Interesting they’re expected to but men have time learning to be virtuous.

4

Anonymous #5 5d

I never said she had to be a virgin I just said she doesn’t need to have a high body count. Also she isn’t a bad person just not for me.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

i think that’s fair, assuming you have the same

5

Anonymous #3 5d

i feel like disrespectful is quite broad and can mean many things

2

Anonymous OP 5d

I have a body count of one and that was from a 4 year relationship.

0

Anonymous OP 5d

Wym disrespectful?

0

Anonymous #3 5d

you said you wouldn’t tolerate disrespect i was just curious about examples

2

i don’t think insults like that are necessary?

1

Projection is strong

0

Anonymous #3 5d

You can believe me or not, but I’m just fucking with you I really could not care less about body count

7

Anonymous OP 5d

I wouldn’t tolerate my gf embarrassing me online or around my friends, going out with revealing clothing on, talking to other men, talking shit about me ( a lot of women talk shit about their husbands behind their back), talking about private matters with her friends, things like that.

1

Anonymous #1 5d

That is just you a lot of men do care.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

your wording is a bit alarming, is it intentional? like embarrassing can be accidental or kind of anything and by tolerate do you mean break up or yell at? talking to other men in general? like no male friends? and do you not think venting is normal/helathy? i have lots of questions

2

Anonymous #3 5d

Those men are dumb. It’s a stupid thing to care about

2

Anonymous OP 5d

I don’t tell in my relationships Christ was soft spoken so am I when I say disrespect you know those women who go online and talk shit about their husbands those wives that air out all their husbands dirty laundry in public I’m talking about that and that’s a automatic break up.

0

Anonymous OP 5d

No male friends you hand out 1 on 1 with I don’t hang out with any one of my girl “friends” one on one nether should she. Venting can be healthy but speaking about what your husband told you in confidence to your friends is the fastest and easiest break up ever.

-1

Anonymous OP 5d

Hang*

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Not everyone wants to be you captain save a hoe.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

Those people are wrong, hoes are the best 🥰

6

Anonymous #1 5d

Keep savings those hoes let me know when you find a woman that’s a long term partner that doesn’t have a history with stds.

-1

Anonymous #3 5d

Damn. That’s one of the most causal super misogynistic things I’ve ever heard

4

Anonymous #1 5d

Its not Misogynistic if I say the exact same thing about men who are whores

-1

Anonymous #3 5d

Ok so you’re anti sex which is also bad. People can have multiple sexual partners without having stds it’s very common

5

Anonymous #1 5d

I’m anti dating promiscuous women cause I’m not promiscuous myself and don’t want a woman that multiple other men have had

5

Anonymous #3 5d

Ok your loss I guess. Also still feels weird to care about a woman’s purity in 2025

2

Anonymous #1 5d

Talk to any consertives Christian man they will tell you the exact same thing.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

That’s a very grey moral line. What’s “high” 3? 7? 15? Sorry but I except adults to act like adults when they become them. There’s no magic 25 wow now I understand empathy/ how I impact others. That lesson is learned way earlier. Yes we make mistakes yes we all still grow and learn. But if you are a man that grew up in the church or in conservative group; you don’t get to just wake up years past adolescence. A good man always respected others, speaks gently, & listens. It’s not a switch

5

Anonymous #3 5d

Oh now you’re quiet 🫢

2

Anonymous #5 5d

Just ain’t see this

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Love that the emoji got your attention

1

Anonymous #5 5d

What’s high is what ever a person sets it at you don’t need multiple people to agree that’s why you have standards your standards shouldn’t conform to the majority or what people say it is it’s what ever you feel comfortable with. You’re acting as if young women aren’t horrible in their younger years as well, we where talking about young men so that’s what I talked about

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Your past comments didn’t really rely that. You said “as long as she doesn’t have a high body count” then continued with your “one count” almost verifying it should be low. So you’re replying to this thread as if it’s personal to you; whereas this thread started very general looking for discussion on the principles not your own goals. Your one experience does not qualify for the full context. Telling everyone how it should be based off you when it’s “what ever the person sets” seems hypocritical

2

Anonymous #5 5d

My past comments where addressing multiple things at once that’s why I said as long as she doesn’t have a high body count I have a body count of 1 so I would not want my gf to have a higher body count than me. You can talk about 2 things in one comment part of my comment can address the principle and another can address me personally. (As long as she doesn’t have a high body count= principle, I have a body count of 1 = personal) I also never told everyone to conform to my stands idk where you-

1

Anonymous #5 5d

Got that form I shouldn’t have to tell people to have their own standards people should be able to know that without being told that.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Wait so now I have to know. If your body count were to go up could your potential partner/her go up as well?

1

Anonymous #5 5d

Yea but it won’t go up.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

Did you think it would before the first?

1

Anonymous #5 5d

No not really 4 year long relationship and we are probably going to get back together.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

There is not one actual reason to be against high body counts other than one’s deep rooted in misogyny or religious misogyny

4

Anonymous #6 5d

Thank you! Someone gets it

4

Anonymous #6 5d

Cool i don’t really care what you call it I don’t want a girl that’s been with multiple dudes.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

And that’s inherently misogynistic

7

Anonymous #3 5d

Why? Like actually answer it

4

Anonymous #1 5d

I really don’t care

-1

Anonymous #3 5d

So now multiple, so you wouldn’t be with a woman that’s been with just more than one, so like yourself?

2

Anonymous #3 5d

So misogyny? You clearly believe that you shouldn’t be with a woman with 2+ partners, yet you won’t admit why

7

Anonymous #3 5d

And if her (the girl you’re talking about) body count were now higher would that be the reason to leave her? Is she not worth it after that?

8

Anonymous #6 5d

You’re not gonna shame be into accepting a hoe or retired hoe, you feel insecure about your body count it’s fine you’ll find someone that’ll accept you but a God fearing man is not one of them.

1

Anonymous #5 5d

Yes I would leave her

-2

Anonymous #3 5d

Wow. You’re just not a good person

2

“A misogynist who hates women” this is hilarious. This is actually funny asf someone feeling insecure.

-2

Anonymous #1 5d

Good thing your opinion is not the end all be all

0

Anonymous #3 5d

Honestly I’m glad more beautiful women for me because most women have had sex because it’s COMPLETELY NORMAL

4

Oh no I’m terrified.

-2

Anonymous #1 5d

That’s good for you, you can have all the hoes we were never competing for the same thing l.

0

Good lord, who raised you

0

What else you got this is entertaining.

0

Sorry may have lost track of who’s who I’m on the pro women side of this argument

0

Anonymous #3 5d

I can’t wait to see you burn in hell. Hope someone finches the job so you’ll be there soon

1

Anonymous #1 5d

i don’t think it’s weird to have that preference if that person is also not promiscuous, i do think it’s weird when that person is promiscuous but insists that the other person have no history of promiscuity

2

Anonymous #3 5d

So worth IS based off of the idea of purity in your own head. Which is only skewed when your own level changes which puts you at the sole center of it. You say you’re a Christian? Have you read the book of Hosea? Perfect depiction of Christ. You should read it; sounds like you have a lesson to learn. You missed church.

2

Anonymous #1 5d

This isn’t a pro woman or pro man stance many women hold men to the same standard as I’ve set for women I date.

-1

Anonymous #3 5d

Well those women are also bad people. Sex is super fun and people who want to do it a lot aren’t any worse people

1

you need to stop with the name calling and targeted insults, it’s not at all in the nature of this post

1

Anonymous #3 5d

not all religious men a militant about past sexual history, you shouldn’t tell someone that

2

Anonymous #5 5d

“God tells you to hate promiscuous woman” please save the word salad yes I’ve read the book of Hosea idk why you bring it up it’s the denouncement of promiscuity

3

Did I make you angry come on let’s use our words.

0

Anonymous #3 5d

sorry i dont know what going on in the thread anymore, i’m sorry people are being rowdy

1

Anonymous #1 5d

Sex is fun and no one is telling you, you can’t have sex, idk why you’re offended not everyone is going to like your promiscuity find someone who does.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Mhm and your girlfriend is being fucked by a real man rn, not some pussy ass micropenis Christian who needs to think of Jesus, a man, to get off

1

I did that to rage bait you and it obviously worked.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

sorry but i just blocked #6, sorry if that interrupted your convo but it was too much

1

Anonymous #6 5d

My ex is in my shower rn taking a shower getting ready for bed.

1

Anonymous OP 5d

i don’t think a woman’s value is tarnished by how many people she’s slept with even if that number is 100,000 but that person had no etiquette and was making everyone with their opinion look bad plus purposely misunderstanding the clear point

3

Anonymous OP 5d

Your good nothing productive was being said they were pussy off and I was just egging them on.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

i think they might just regret their sexual history but i don’t think that means they need to insult you and also weaponize the Bible, just very strange and mean

1

Anonymous #3 5d

I don’t think you understand. A high body count does not equate to promiscuity. And you hold the value of a relationship based off that status. That book actually break every assumption common evangelical conservative mindset has on women. He saw her and saw her value not her sexual endeavors. No one else thought she was more than a slut but he saw her as God did. So ya you did miss a lesson.

2

Anonymous OP 5d

All humans are valued he same but the things you do make you not everyone cup of tea, some people like tall guys or short guys, nice guys or mean guys, none of it’s a issue until it comes to body count.

1

Anonymous OP 5d

Yea mb. Shouldn’t a have said that was a the heat of the moment kind of thing

2

Anonymous #5 5d

I’m not God it’s not my duty to date/save women with a high body count.

1

Anonymous #5 5d

I don’t have to accept anyone for anything even if you take being Christ like into account I don’t have to date people with high body counts no matter what you say the scripture literally tells us to find a wife we want and would be happy with I wouldn’t be happy with a gf that’s been with a lot of men.

-1

Anonymous #1 5d

How is not wanting a partner with tons of bodies or promiscuous being bad?I think it’s completely reasonable to not wanna be with someone who sleeps around, if you also don’t. And maybe this generation could use a lil more anti sex. All I hear women talking ab is hookups n im sure it’s the same with men. Some people want more depth

1

Anonymous #3 5d

A lot of men apparently is based on your count w/ women there lies the issue. You keep throwing it on I don’t want a “this”. Sure! We all have preferences but your value is only dependent on your own purity and I don’t understand how you don’t see that’s deplorable. Your ex would be the issue if she was with one other man but apparently not if you were with one other woman. Hiding behind an idea of preference only works if it’s an actual preference. That shouldn’t change based off current action

0

Anonymous OP 5d

Perhaps…. These traits you search for aren’t as simple as liberal or conservative 💀 you do realize half the stuff you said is bipartisan right

1

Anonymous #5 5d

I’m dating the woman why do you care what I classify a lot of men as? That’s for me to decide I’m not telling anyone else they got to follow my lead. I don’t want or feel the need to be with another woman and if I do get with another woman it’s up to my ex to decide if she wants to date me or not.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

It’s funny you invited your own self to the conversation “asking men” in which people ask men. Did you forget? Also you said “probably get back together” so doesn’t really sound all that serious or official. But you come into this thread with opinions but when you get pressured it’s oh no that’s my own thing and it’s private. Like come on bro where’s the back bone. I see hardly an explanation on again a thread YOU commented on any of your options. Just “what I want yo why do you care”. Fr Lame.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

Also to your girl who was in the shower while he was arguing with people online. There is a man out there who would not drop you solely based off that. He will see you in the eyes of Christ and love you unconditionally based off the value of you being you. I bet you have a hobby, I bet you have a favorite song, I bet you have a secret, I bet you miss someone. You are human you can make mistakes you can be messy and wrong. But God will always & I mean always know you love you and never give up u.

1

Anonymous #5 4d

What you mean backbone, you can be capital save a hoe that doesn’t mean we all have to be. I don’t have a duty to accept anything from anyone I can set my own standards and want what I want to want, and if you’re a woman no God fearing respectable man is going to take a woman that’s been with multiple guys seriously Nether is it their duty too.

0

Anonymous #9 4d

This is objectively false! The ones that “wear blue hats” want society to do well and for everyone to have a minimum standard of living and rights… the red hats want to step on others necks to be an inch taller. Ohh and serve those who already have more than they could ever spend.

1

Anonymous #8 4d

If this is true then why are we seeing an uptake in violent crime from the left side. If the left is trully as accepting as they say they are then why is a man whos whole goal is open conversations and advocating free speech dead? Regardless the politicians on both sides are corrupt. Neither side is better then the other. The extremes are what the media shows. There are millions of regular people who exist who voted red cause the blue candatite was frankly not a good choice

1

Anonymous #9 3d

That’s not true in the slightest. Overwhelming violence is coming from the right wing; the guy who shot Charlie Kirk was an incel fascist. And Charlie Kirk was a stochastic terrorist- he was not interested in free speech. He had a watchlist for professors who were too left leaning, for example. Also, the republicans are certainly worse than the democrats, but that isn’t to say democrat aren’t corrupt and that media isn’t trying to sway you one way or another.

0

Anonymous evilbusinessmajor 2d

These are the comments from Tyler the incel fascist in question. Not only was Tyler not a incel fascist he was one of you a left wingers with a trans girlfriend, no matter how much you and your leftiod friends say he was a incel or a fascist it’s wrong the state departments quotes and research on him have shown he is left wing and deeply in the rabbit hole of leftism.

1

Anonymous evilbusinessmajor 2d

Also show me evidence he had a list of left wing professors are left wingers just making shit up now. And republicans are objectively better than democrats.

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Dude, why would you trust the government and the FBI here? Patel called the victim a brother and the Utah governor wanted the killer to be an undesirable. That exchange is made up- especially seeing how the FBI destroyed the shooter’s manifesto.

1

Anonymous #3 2d

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist Feel free to follow any citation on there. And please reference the economy, the literal concentration camps, the murders in Iran and Venezuela (which would be acts of war), and the decline of the American empire as reasons why the Republicans are worse than democrats. I’m not gonna defend democrats here, but let’s not play pretend.

1