Anonymous #1 5d

What the hell is a pick me girl

6

Anonymous OP 5d

Girls who only care about male validation. Like putting other girls down in front of guys or completely altering their personality to appeal to men

24

Anonymous #2 5d

I feel if she didn’t do some of her past actions, this outfit would have a different reaction. Honestly she looks amazing. But her history ruins this look

12

Anonymous #1 5d

Exactly!

6

Anonymous #1 5d

Can you go into more detail? What did she do 😅

1

Anonymous OP 5d

Hell. It better to look it up honestly

1

Anonymous #2 5d

Completely genuine question here but shouldn’t we be supporting women if they want to wear a bra or not? Most women in my life sorta have that outlook it seems like, which makes sense to me. Wear it if it works for you and don’t if it doesn’t kinda thing. Why is it different for someone like this? Bc she’s famous or what?

0

Anonymous #3 5d

But a lot of famous women were very sexual and openly and are highly respected for pushing forward women's empowerment. Like Madonna, Diane Lane, Pamela Anderson. I just know that she was in Euphoria and she did the jeans ad so I don't really get why women in particular seem to hate her so much.

4

Anonymous #1 5d

Maybe I don't follow her enough but I never got the impression that she's doing it for the male validation. She seems like she's doing it because she knows she's basically the most desirable woman in the world. Which all sex symbols in the past have acted like that. So what's she doing that's different?

3

Anonymous OP 5d

Girls who have a bigger chest tend to get sexualized way too often. So when Sydney Sweeney started getting popular, everyone thought that the big chest girls were finally gonna get the inclusion they deserved. And it was that first but then she slowly started sexualizing herself. She did an ad for a body wash. The ad starts with her in the bathtub and she says “hello you dirty boys. Are you interested in my body…wash?”

6

Anonymous #1 5d

I mean she can’t control being born with a bigger chest tho right? And what would inclusion mean? That she’s famous but doesn’t ever sexualize herself? I just don’t see how this doesn’t turn into ‘she should act this way because she was born this way’ which seems to be obviously not the right way of looking at things

1

Anonymous #4 5d

Like shouldn’t people be able to sexualize themselves if that’s what they want?

1

Anonymous #1 5d

Then she did another ad where she says “boys only want one thing” and then the camera zooms in on her chest. She did the American eagle ad where she says something about jeans and the camera zooms in on her chest and she says “hey eyes up here” and then a male voice in the back says “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.” Her ad about WOMEN’s jeans appeals to her male audience rather than her female audience. Her constant sexualization of herself has affected the way some men treat big-chest women

4

Anonymous #1 5d

Okay but I thought that behavior was standard fare for sex symbols since forever. And I thought point was she's not doing it for male validation, she's doing it to show all the thirsty men what they will never have and to show that a woman should feel comfortable and open with her sexual aspects versus repressing it as the religious Right would have everyone do

11

Anonymous OP 5d

Sure but there’s a time and place for everything. Why would you make an ad about women’s apparel but then cater it to ur male audience

9

Anonymous #1 5d

That’s what she wants

1

Anonymous #1 5d

Maybe she wanted to make an ad that would do both? Trying to get what's so horrible about an ad that capitalizes on her status as a sex symbol/gets male attention and also shows off new women's clothing. Like an ad for women's clothing should only ever contain things women like, otherwise it's horribly wrong?

1

Anonymous OP 5d

Yeah also sorta thinking this. How are we supposed to assess that she’s doing this for a male audience and that that is somehow harmful to other women? Sometimes famous sexy men do ads for things that women buy and sometimes famous sexy women do ads for things that men buy. How is that inherently harming women/ not supporting women?

1

Anonymous OP 5d

Sure but the ad shouldn’t also completely push women away and only attract men right? At the end of the day, women are the ones buying the jeans

0

Anonymous #4 5d

I just can’t figure out where the line is in between someone showing off their body in a “I don’t care who’s looking or what they think, it’s my body and I’ll dress how I want” kinda way from someone who’s doing it in an immoral, catering to the male gaze kinda way.

0

Anonymous #4 5d

I mean sure anyone can do whatever they want. You just gotta face the backlash for ur consequences

1

Anonymous #1 5d

But how can you determine that she’s worthy of backlash? Just for dressing a certain way and doing certain ads where she’s showing off her body? Like why should we be criticizing that?

0

Anonymous OP 5d

I don’t think in particular women hate her, I think it’s more that they don’t like how publicly sexual she is, she also was in a heydudes commercial I’m pretty sure and for some reason that was sexual? Women empowerment for sex and just being sexual for no reason are two different things

4

Anonymous #3 5d

Could you elaborate on the difference? Like how would you look at an ad she’s done and put it in one of those camps versus another?

1

Anonymous #4 5d

There is a difference between wanting to make sexual things normalized for women because women shouldn’t be embarrassed to say, buy a sex toy or something, but publicly putting on a “sexual” voice while doing ads and saying things that are sexual in order to get media attention are completely two different things. She also accepted those roles knowing what they were, I think she probably wasn’t getting enough publicity so she wanted to try something else.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

This!!! This is what I was trying to say.

6

Anonymous #1 5d

I’m pretty sure American eagles sales went down during that time, but that’s only what I’ve heard

1

Anonymous #1 5d

I don't know, the only comparison I can think of is maybe the Victoria's Secret fashion show? Married couples love that shit. Maybe women see it and think "I want to be so hot that men will want me but can't have me!" Do women not value feeling desired by men? If no men desired you, that wouldn't make you feel insecure?

1

Anonymous #3 5d

So you are basically saying she's doing the whole sex symbol thing in a cheaper/less classier way? I think I understand that, but I think sex symbols have done that since the beginning of whenever sex symbols was a thing. Only recently have I noticed such a huge backlash, mainly from girls who just recently became adults.

1

Anonymous OP 5d

and that’s not to say that those people probably got backlash as well. I think a lot of people, especially women are sorta preferring a bit more modesty now days. I’ve gone through the whole revealing crop tops, tight shirts, short shorts, and now I’m getting to the point where it’s like not attractive to me. I think nowadays we are kinda tired of seeing other people’s entire body’s and privates because we see it everywhere, including where it is deemed inappropriate.

1

Anonymous #3 5d

The descent of the youth and America in general into far-right madness and conservative tinged attitudes, especially where sexuality is concerned, is truly sad to witness. Personally, I think it'll end (or begin?) with a significant rollback of women's rights... Cheered on with cries of "modesty" and "shame." 😔

2

Anonymous OP 4d

“Doing it becausw she’s the most desirable woman in the world” Desirable by whom?

1

Anonymous OP 4d

If no men desired me, I would be chasing bugs. A man has desired me, therefore I chase bugs with a boyfriend standing awkwardly nearby. Some of us base our self-worth around our humanity and behavior and truly don’t care about our attractiveness to the huzz. Only reason to care is if your life goals include partner/family

1

Anonymous OP 4d

I don’t know much about this Sweeny lady either… she’s not a bug.

1

Anonymous #5 4d

Where was the eugenics part?

1

Anonymous OP 4d

I think if you believe dressing sexually will change women’s rights I feel you are to closed minded, there is nothing wrong wanting to dress modestly, and I say this in a sense of just not having your boobs and butt out or being able to see your nipples through your shirt. Honestly, I feel uncomfortable and I believe a lot of other women do as well and there is nothing wrong with that. I’m not saying everyone should but I personally prefer it.

1

Anonymous #3 4d

There is a TON of liberation in reclaiming our sexuality. But she doesn’t care about that, just the views.

1

Anonymous #9 4d

In a*

1

Anonymous #9 4d

And the most recent thing I’ve seen about her is how happy she is with her boyfriend Scooter Braun after meeting him at Jeff Bezos wedding. Like come on. Ofc I don’t like her.

3

Anonymous #4 4d

Could anyone answer this? Just genuinely curious why this seems to be unpopular to say but nobody has an answer

1

Anonymous #4 4d

A better question is give me one reason why I should like her

1

Anonymous #9 4d

I don’t hate her but she has only given me reasons to not like her

1

Anonymous #9 4d

That is a different question but I wouldn’t really say it’s better. Especially since I was ideally hoping for an answer to my question. You can definitely dislike anyone for any reason, there’s not much to debate there. I was talking to people here who dislike her for the way she uses her body and how she markets towards men. I’m wondering how you can tell that she’s sexualizing herself in the right or wrong way?

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Not to disregard your question, it just doesn’t seem like one that needs much discussion. I am however confused about the question I was asking, if you have any input I’d love to hear it

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Her American eagle ad is at the very least kinda tone deaf but mainly for me is that she’s obviously Republican and money grabby

1

Anonymous #9 4d

And she associates with Bezos and scooter Braun

1

Anonymous #9 4d

I don’t dislike people for just showing off their body, like Sabrina, but when it’s in a purely male centered taking everything and every person that will put her closer to money way, yeah I don’t think she’s a great person

1

Anonymous #9 4d

Sorry I’m just really thinking of it now. That person who phrased it as “overly sexualized right ring grift” is spot on with it all for her

1

Anonymous #9 4d

Wing*

1

Anonymous #9 4d

But pop stars have been doing that since forever. It used to be only a problem with the religious conservatives, the type who believe women are infants etc. But now it looks like a really frightening alliance is forming between Project 2025 and mainstream feminism.

1

Anonymous OP 4d

Most pop stars are very much not conservative

1

Anonymous #9 4d

Right, pop stars show off their femininity and sexuality a lot. Project 2025 and modern feminists seem to not like that. Feminism legitimizing Project 2025's goal to curb women's sexuality will legitimize the rest of the movement which will result in the return of things like normalization of wife beating.

0

Anonymous #9 4d

If you find yourself on the same side as the Nazis/women haters, maybe you need to take a step back and ask if you've been hoodwinked into adopting views that are woman hating.

0

Anonymous OP 4d

I’m not saying I hate pop stars showing their sexuality. If that was it, then I’d hate literally even a single other pop star like that

1

Anonymous #9 4d

One of my favorite female celebs literally openly has her own nudes out

1

Anonymous #5 4d

Idk if “genes/jeans” is eugenics laden. Everyone has different DNA and you can say we all have “good” and “bad” genes. But the ad wasn’t saying people who didn’t have her “good” genes shouldn’t reproduce or something

1