Ask Women on Yik Yak | It is a thing that p3d0philes do use innocent pictures of children for non-innocent purposes regardless of whether they’re breaking the law or not. So one could argue that regardless, posting pics of children on the internet is dangerous.

Yik Yak

Download

Join communities on Yik Yak Download

Ask Women 4w

It is a thing that p3d0philes do use innocent pictures of children for non-innocent purposes regardless of whether they’re breaking the law or not. So one could argue that regardless, posting pics of children on the internet is dangerous.

Ask Women 5w

To solve the issues of images on the Internet depicting child zexxual abuze should we make it illegal to post images of children on the internet even if the images are innocent?

Anonymous 4w

Posting anything on the internet is dangerous

Anonymous 4w

Dawg I appreciate your sentiment, but you are also in this instance describing a potential free speech violation. You need to start thinking about this in the legal sense. Bc I agree pedophiles are bad. But there are laws and rights that you cannot violate without pushback and setting dangerous precedents

Anonymous

#1 4w

They didnt make a policy recommendation, they only stated its dangerous. You will not be as good of an armchair lawyer as daddy said you would unless you read what people say.

Anonymous

#1 4w

Also “i agree pedophiles are bad. But…” does not read well. Would be careful defending the rights of paedophiles lil bro.

Anonymous

#2 4w

Hey kiddo in case you haven't been following this topic over the past few days this person have suggested multiple times institutionalizing people who are suspected of being pedophiles based only on suspicion with little to no evidence. The post they quoted suggests to make it illegal to post those photos which is where that violation comes into play. Look at the bigger picture.

Anonymous

#1 4w

In mine and most i know’s opinion suspicion is enough, if you knew someone was a pedo should or would you sit around and wait for them to take advantage of a child before you pulverize them into red mist? Ob not from a government pov, but if they wont, then someone must.

Anonymous

#1 4w

Dude is literally bending over backwards to defend pedophiles yikes

Anonymous

#2 4w

Appreciate the ad hominem. In court if you tell the judge aye just trust me bro this guy is a pedo I have suspicion. With no solid evidence is that going to get results?