Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Someone's living life with rose colored glasses. Fact is she is dead and should've been dead but was kept alive as a sick experiment, harming her and the baby. Who's going to care for the baby afterwards? Why is that never a thought?
This post is unavailable
upvote 52 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

They are definitely looking to argue because they are getting ratiod hard in the comments

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

OP either lacks common sense or is looking to argue because nothing about what they did to that woman should be any type of legal. Arguing I’m happy the baby is alive it was 7-8 weeks when she died, it wasn’t even a viable baby yet that’s why that had to force her to 21 weeks.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Guess I already have #1 blocked from previous bs they’ve said

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

If your mom because brain dead but is pregnant you want her to be used as an incubator?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Because it wasn’t baby genius lol, you don’t know what eugenics means from the amount of times you said it on your post and don’t know what a baby is. A baby possess the capacity to be born. You aren’t viable at 9 weeks the youngest baby to be born was 21 weeks and it didn’t live very longs that why the 4-6 month mark is important in pregnancy. That why they kept her body pumping until it was 21 weeks because they knew it had no prosperity for life before then.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

The baby’s survival doesn’t override the complete abuse of that woman by the medical system and their cutting off the family from making any decisions regarding her care.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

It’s barely surviving, lol they mentioned it’s hooked up to. I can promise you the seven yr old would’ve rather his mother than a brother he can never see.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Have you looked at the articles saying that she barely knew she was pregnant before she passed. Regardless her family as her medial POA has every right to terminate. And since the state didn’t give them the right they shouldn’t be forced to pay her medical bills because they kept her alive for an experiment.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Hoody hoo, unconscious and brain dead aren’t the same get that straight like the several things you haven’t been able to do. If they aren’t in the capacity to care for it also it wouldn’t have lived because she was 9 weeks.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8w

Its a really bad take about the adrianna smith situation

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

Ofc it is probably some bs it being okay to keep a brain dead woman on machines to about keep the baby alive. Ignoring the fact that Adrianna was literally rotting and that baby now has life long medical issues

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 8w

Yup. And was saying how anyone is crazy if they dont wanna save the baby since Adrianna already died and at least the baby gets to live. And complained about eugenics when we said how awful the quality of life would be for the baby

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

They always bring up eugenics in these situations but not when they’re racist friends say shit about not mixing races

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

It would be different if she had written or expressed anything about wanting to be kept alive like that for the sake of her baby. The family had the right to decide what happened to her, and the government robbed them of it. Also they stuck them with all the medical expenses even after they expressed they did not want that to happen.

upvote 5 downvote