Anonymous twirling_tornado 20h

Might i introduce Schrodingers abortion, having a child could increase long term population or decrease long term population

38

Anonymous OP 20h

and?

-11

Anonymous twirling_tornado 20h

Yeah and pregnancy can kill women too. Wouldnt you rather the already fully conscious woman survive than the unborn fetus?

26

Anonymous twirling_tornado 20h

The reason you are right is just as much the reason you are wrong

27

Anonymous #3 20h

ofc i would, the mother’s life is always the priority. but thats like 0.00001% of abortions

-7

Anonymous #3 20h

No! The phrase is “wont someone think of the children” not “won’t someone think of the women” ~Spinny_Twister (probably)

11

Anonymous OP 20h

ur dumb lmao i said that people being born makes a DIFFERENCE in the world. i didn’t say “it makes a positive difference in the population numbers”

-4

Anonymous OP 20h

im fully on the side of the mothers living lmao

-4

Anonymous twirling_tornado 20h

in the extreme vast majority of abortions, absolutely nothing is wrong with the mother

-3

Anonymous twirling_tornado 20h

No i mean it could make a negative difference in the world

8

Anonymous OP 18h

so?? that makes it ok to kill an innocent life before it gets a chance to make any sort of difference??

-6

Anonymous twirling_tornado 18h

and again ur completely losing the point which is that YOUR post said “it doesn’t affect anyone” and i responded saying YES abortion does affect all of the people who WOULD have been affected by that person’s life had they been given a chance to live. whether it turns out that they make a net positive or net negative difference in the world or not

-5

Anonymous OP 18h

did you know a THIRD of gen z is missing because of specifically abortion??

-5

Anonymous #5 16h

i doubt this is true, republican women are just like that

11

Anonymous twirling_tornado 16h

and would the world end without cristiano ronaldo? who gives a fuck. maybe that fetus is the next hitler. we can talk about the “what ifs” all day

9

Anonymous #7 16h

Schrodingers Fetus mentioned?

12

Anonymous #7 16h

or maybe the people supporting the killing of a third of gen z which is MORE PEOPLE than hitler are the problem??

-4

Anonymous twirling_tornado 16h

Have you ever eaten meat

10

Anonymous #7 16h

funny you mention hitler, a person who also used eugenics as a reason to kill people, like many abortion activists “but it might be sick or disabled or poor or just not the right race or gender that i want”

-3

Anonymous twirling_tornado 16h

fetuses that can’t think, feel, or live outside the womb are not the same as the viable humans hitler murdered.

15

Anonymous twirling_tornado 16h

You seem like the kind of person who finds salt too spicy

12

Anonymous #8 16h

Water too wet

15

Anonymous #5 14h

The way I saw abortion in the post and immediately knew I was gonna see them in here

12

Anonymous #9 13h

and there’s nothing inherently wrong with apathy, it’s merely the state of not being concerned with something. one shouldn’t be concerned with what others do with their bodies anyway.

1

Anonymous #12 13h

technically, but the act of not being concerned for the well being of others is antisocial (referring to the psychiatric definition), which is a net negative for humanity

10

Anonymous #13 12h

And it’s true. So what’s your point?

1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 12h

They’re not because they were never Gen Z. Almost all abortions are early before it becomes a fetus and are done at the stages of embryo. Late term abortions were already banned when it became visible and could live without the mother. If it needs to be physically attached to the woman to live, she can say she does not consent to it, and remove it

12

Anonymous #10 10h

oml twirling is still active?? I remember when she blocked me a year ago after I showed her a screenshot of her one and only source saying “if you interpret this study in [way she interpreted] then you are scum” LMAOOO I’m laughing just remembering

3

Anonymous #14 10h

how is she gonna be pro life and fearmonger birth control? i’m looking at my birth control insert right now and the main reason it’s so big and long is because it contains information in english & spanish on how the pill works, how to take it, how it compares in effectiveness to other birth control methods, etc. it has a side effects and risks section (like any prescription medication) but most of it is just information about the pill. this screenshot would scare/intimidate anyone new to bc.

7

Anonymous #1 9h

same kinda, not really. in my family we learned gun safety from the moment we could walk. i grew up going to the range and first time i shot a gun was on my 4th birthday. i am very comfortable with guns. however i grew up in a city with a bunch of thug wanna-bes that don’t know how to act and thinks guns are toys or a way of showing off. what i’m not comfortable with is dumbasses having access to weapons or worse, brining them to places they shouldn’t be

8

Anonymous #1 9h

i think they should be controlled in the sense of needing permits because there’s no way little KIDS should be getting access to guns

6

Anonymous #7 8h

Exactly

1

Anonymous #13 8h

Me?

1

Anonymous #17 8h

yes absolutely. no one needs to be carrying/buying unless they have a license. i grew up hunting and everything was very controlled. when i was first starting my dad always held the gun and i was holding it with him. i don’t think i handled a gun on my own till i was about 7 but even then my dad was standing right beside me watching my every move. his eyes did not get taken off of me and i was in the proper earmuffs, eye protection, closed toed shoes, and reflective vest

1

Anonymous #16 8h

there’s definitely a way to raise a kid correctly around guns but unfortunately most people won’t do it if they have guns in the house. in my house nothing gets left out, my dad is the only one who has the code to the safe, no one was allowed to take me or my siblings to the range or hunting without my dad present and it was that way until i was 14. gun safety was definitely taken very seriously in my house and that’s something i’ll teach to my kids and anyone who’s interested

8

Anonymous #7 5h

they literally do think feel and live ???

0

Anonymous #14 5h

first of all yes they are, second of all late term abortions are still allowed in MULTIPLE states 💀

1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 5h

someone in here has to care about human rights to life since most of y’all brush it off so quickly when it comes to totally helpless innocent tiny human beings

-1

Anonymous #7 5h

1) its not that deep 2) birth control is also stupid and horrible for women’s health and hormones and never 100% effective, if ur not ready to have a kid then just don’t do the stuff that leads to kids it’s not that hard

-1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 4h

Oh boy! A logically fallacy with no bearing whatsoever! Based on drumroll please.... an assumption! Consider this. Women's right to choose over what happens with their body is a human right. And if you're religious look up when the bible considers life to begin. Specifically Genesis 2:7.

1