
yeah but i think if their intention is to point out that their lack of romantic/ sexual success unsuccessful because of shitty character traits completely within their control it’s a little more valid. making fun of virgins just bc they haven’t had sex is a bitch move. it’s shaming based on the belief that a man’s worth is tied to his ability to have sex with women, & that ties into societal beliefs abt masculinity equating to dominance and sexual conquest.
Depends on why he’s unsuccessful. Simply just not having success is normal for literally everyone. Someone likely has had the exact same experience you have had. The man that deliberately are pieces of shit to ppl that correlate to their lack of success and push that pain and idiocy on to other ppl not so much. They wouldn’t get the same leniency or compassion. At least from me
You don’t know that their personality is the reason it is an assumption. What if their lack of success results in a behavior change that you a person who comes along later down the line perceives as bad. Attributing their lack of success to a personality change that is the result of failure is post hoc rationalizing.
oh i’m sure it can be cyclical like that. and ur right, no one can know for sure the exact reasoning that someone struggles with dating/ sex. i even said in my other comment that it’s not all just personality flaws. i’m just saying if idk any other context besides knowing they’re an incel and they’re acting like an incel… (misogynistic hateful etc) im not gonna feel bad about telling them to get their personality in check, and calling them an incel.