When I see this evidence in court I will believe it. Until then, I do not believe that she consented to being offered as “free p***y” to 57 men

31

Anonymous OP 18h

God willing these frivolous vindictive accusations don’t even make it that far but otherwise I expect this to be a quick acquittal. She’s embarrassed because of disgusting decisions, as she should be, but that doesn’t mean she gets to lie and destroy the lives of innocent consensual participants out of shame and revenge. The evidence is overwhelming against her including her own admissions before, during and after. There is a reason this was never charged in 2024 because it’s baseless.

-23

Anonymous #1 17h

You calling what SHE did disgusting shows how warped your perspective truly is

29

Anonymous #2 17h

For the record I think the men were disgusting too for the consensual group sex. But that still doesn’t make it 🍇

-20

Anonymous #1 17h

You are such a prude

29

Anonymous #2 17h

I think that entirely misses the bigger issue here.

-16

Anonymous #1 17h

No. Your perspective of the bigger issue is warped by your perception of sex

31

You need help. You’re likely the same loser commenting elsewhere. Whomever raised you, failed. You do not have any basic understanding of consent.

21

Also by the way, both she and the men were intoxicated, technically neither her nor the men who had sex with her could consent. There is nothing in her written and signed complaint that states she consented to all 50+ men in that group chat. There is however statement saying she consented to a threesome. Now, are you able to do math? Is a three some the same as having sex with seven men while on drugs and then being advertised to another 50? No? I don’t think so.

9