
The commenter here that so courageously (sarcasm) kept their rape apologist comment (#1) if was such an innocent comment and not literally excusing rape why would you delete it? Also claiming I have mental illness because I clocked your comment? Ableism/sanism especially in an autistic thread isn’t cute. If that’s what you have to resort to, you’ve lost the argument and everyone knows it.
I will gladly educate you, because this comment is pure ignorance. YOU CANNOT CONSENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE & CONSENT CAN BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME! With that being said, even if what you said is true and she consented while sober, if she withdrew consent or asked to stop at any point, especially after taking the drugs or after the act had begun, they should have STOPPED. Her prior consent no longer matters. This i feel is the most likely scenario and doesn't make them any less of predators.
From what I’ve heard she did ask them to stop multiple times and they did when she asked, but would then keep going. They were also repeatedly giving her more ketamine which is a central nervous system depressant, meaning she could barely move, making her both too mentally and physically incapacitated to be able to continue or rescind consent — they should’ve stopped!
She also only initially consented to a threesome before taking drugs, after which she wouldn’t have been able to consent to four more men using her body for seven hours while repeatedly drugging her. + the men advertised her as “free pussy” and said that other men could just walk in and whip it out. She couldn’t have consented to that, and those men who decided to join didn’t also intoxicate themselves until after she was already incapable of further consent
It is absolutely terrifying that you don’t have a clear picture of how consent works and needed it explained to this extent. Shame on whomever raised you. Truly. I’d have some words with them if I could. The shit you said here was literally rapist shit. At minimum enabling rape. I hope you are still a virgin because you should not be sexually active if you do not have a clear understanding of consent.
You weren’t reaching out for help and understanding you were literally blaming the victim and saying rapist shit. You being a victim of SA doesn’t change that. I also didn’t speak in ALL CAPS. I accentuated a few words. There’s a difference. You claiming that she consented… don’t be angry at me be angry with the people who raised you and failed explaining basic consent to you. I’m also a victim of SA. I don’t go around excusing rapists.
I didn’t delete my comment and I’ll call you mentally ill again. All I did was ask for information from actual people than from a news article. Thank you for giving me the information. Fuck you for the rest of the crap you said. It’s unfortunate that you’re the one I had to run into. You’re just a piece of shit.
funny cause that wasn't me, i was the first commenter, who did not call you names and simply gave you the information. but the fact that all your responses since have consisted of nothing but angry name calling with no fact or basis behind them, (to the wrong commenter might i add) just shows that you are not as smart as you think you are
the comments are numbered don’t lie. You told me I don’t have a concept of what consent means. Absolutely insane when all I did was copy what was said from some news article ask for clarification, thank you for clarifying, and then tell you that the news article and the investigation had a bunch of pieces left out I’m not surprised the investigation left stuff out because the investigation into my rapist magically didn’t work too 🙃🙃 You’re an awful person. work on being less reactive
please go back and double check that fact, and re-read this thread. because the only reactive person here is you. which is why you're mixing things up so easily. letting the incessant need to be right and angry reactions to being wrong get the better of you makes you look like an idiot.
well you deleted your first comment so i wouldn't be able to reference. and this comment is also ignorant, and frankly quite racist. not that it's any of your business that english is in fact my first language, but you're probably only saying that due to the fact that you may not be able to understand some of my "bigger words" 😭 i'm not going to entertain this anymore, i have better things to do with my life than try to educate someone when the information is again, public knowledge.
You absolutely deleted your comment sweetie. You’re such a liar. You made a rape apologist comment. And then you acted like you were just curious looking for answers… and then you threw when you were an essay victim, as if that excuses you when most predators are victims of SA. Oh no. I used caps there, are you going to mock me for using “all caps” 😂 why are you lying? You deleted your comment and we can all see it!
Yeah went to snapshot the comment to show others on another app how people were excusing this & saw it was deleted which is why I made my comment. They’re claiming they didn’t delete it when we can all see it was deleted lol also, predators are usually victims of SA. Not all victims of SA are predators obviously but most predators are victims of SA, so stating they’re a victim of SA after that kind of nasty comment trying to blame her, was messed up. As if that absolves blatant victim blaming.
No one else can delete it. It’s deleted sweetie. I didn’t say you were a predator, I stated a fact. Your comment was nasty AF. If you didn’t delete it you realize it’s worse that the system took it down for you? That should show everyone how BAD it was. YOU need help. If you’re offended I said predators are often victims of SA too. You might want to sit with that. I’m a victim of SA & if someone said that to me it wouldn’t make me mad. I know I’m not & that is a fact. Telling on yourself here.
You do realize it’s worse if mods decided your comment was so egregious it needed to be deleted? You’re not helping your case here 😆 Aw look more ableism from you because you can’t react any other way. You can’t defend what you said. Oh no I used a few words in caps last comment, might want to call your therapist. I know how much that triggers you.
Alright, here’s your information so you can shut up and move on. Jane doe originally gave a statement to the police saying that she consented to an initial threesome but that she began feeling extremely uncomfortable afterwards and more men joined. In her report she said that she pushed them away and tried to cover herself and felt as though she couldn’t get out. Meaning that while the initial encounter was consensual (how is that even possible she was intoxicated and so were the men)
The four other men and the 50+ she was advertised too was not. This report or statement was signed by her all the way back in 2024. The reason charges were never brought was because the university claimed it cooperated in an investigation but this transcript never made it into the DA’s hands and therefore charges weren’t brought. The case is being reopened because there is new evidence and the university is being sued for their failure.