Then explain why universities are having to schedule workshops on how to operate Microsoft Word, open PDFs, access desktop web browsers, basic computing, and co-enrollment classes with adult/senior living centers on the basics of computer hardware. It’s a very real problem. If you don’t believe me, as your professors.
Admittedly I don’t know what you’ve experienced, but u can tell you that I have to help my parents and grandparents routinely with both their desktop computers and phones. None of my friends have ever expressed any frustration with using their technology. The only thing I don’t know how to do is work with spreadsheets, but that’s pretty specialized
This is not something I am making up. This is a documented and widespread problem. There are literally dozens of research articles published about it in the past 18 months. It isn’t about MY experience just like it isn’t about YOUR experience. It is a trending experience across an entire generation. Spreadsheets aren’t specialized, and that’s part of the issue. Excel is a basic software app that has potential for advanced use. Most college students have no clue how it works.
And most are largely illiterate when it comes to the Adobe and Microsoft software suites—two critical sets of skills that are often the difference between getting hired and whining on TikTok about not being able to find a job. It’s a documented concern that is approaching actual crisis level in the educational and professional spheres.
I built my own Linux system when I was 10, wrote new router firmware to reduce packet loss by 60% when I was 13, and have received multiple cease and desist letters from Nintendo and LucasArts from rom hacks. You’re right. We’re not the same. But my experience—once again—is only anecdotal. The trending experience across the demographic is extreme tablet/phone literacy with pc software/hardware illiteracy.
Schools are partially to blame for this since. To add to our anecdotal pile, my school had a computer lab when I was in 1st grade filled with desktops. By 2nd grad they had been replaced with a cart full of iPads. To add to the Microsoft and Adobe convo, it’s because schools these days seem to have a grudge against both. They’ve been replaced by the Google family and another OTHER program the school can find.
Which does lead me to a question: If Gen Z is familiar with programs that perform the same tasks, including free programs, then is being familiar with Adobe and Microsoft office really a good measurement for technical literacy? Is this just journalists doing to Gen Z what was done to millennials?
But you get my point right? I literally made a robot that delivers equipment across a factory floor for a company as my senior design project but does that not count because I presented with Slides and not PowerPoint? I didn’t even know Microsoft Outlook existed till after I got my current job.
It is a good measurement, yes. Because it is industry-standard software across dozens of critical industries. Student users have trouble understanding that because they don’t understand how watered down the free alternatives are. You can’t do everything Excel can do when you use Sheets. You are eliminating the majority of its actual usefulness in lieu of a basic information design platform. Same with word.
What you are suggesting is the same premise that would ask if studios should really use high-quality editing software for audio and video because some kid in Cleveland made an entire movie on his iPhone. Sure. He can do that. But it’s extremely limited. I can record a track in my bathroom with a notation device, but I could do much better with an iso booth and Adobe Audition.
I know. I’m talking about how schools would absolutely use administrative access accounts for both Microsoft and Adobe if they had the funding. How do I know that? Because plenty of schools already do when they have the tech funding. Teachers at any level do not choose Google Docs because it is “better” in any sense. They only choose it when it is the only available option, is institutionally required, or for integration with Google Classroom, which is another shitty free platform.
And I’m saying you’re wrong, as evidence by the fact that thousands of districts across the country choose paid software access over free software access. That’s rather definitive proof that cost/funding is a more significant barrier than penny-pinching administrators. If your stance were reality, few districts would take that route. They’d almost all be on Google for LMS purposes.