
I’m also tired of the dictionary definition btches saying erotica and visual porn are the same thing. Like words can’t have varied definitions and colloquial nuances. Like we aren’t in a book server and can’t use critical thinking skills to understand that there is a major difference between filmed pornography that exploits real individuals and fictional words on a page. Instead we will ignore science so someone can feed their superiority complex 🙄
I mean I think two things can be true at the same time. Reading romance and erotic books is totally fine, and to your point there’s tons of layers of misogyny in there too. There are also people who have addictions to it because they treat some of them like porn. Girls in particular are finding access to what’s essentially torture porn and have the worlds misshapen by it. In most cases it’s a non issue but it’s important to talk about the risks and dangers that come with it
i think you’re right about women being put down for reading due to misogyny-and written porn is more ethical than recorded (how ethical it is still is up to whoever)- but i think we ought to be honest there is a huge difference between literature and smut. dostoevsky is not yaoi fan fiction. and i know someone who spends hours of their day studying both but one speaks to the human condition and the other one is leisurely consumption of erotic material. this isn’t a condemnation but like. be real
Reading a textbook on bluebirds and watching a documentary on them are different experiences because books and movies are different mediums. However both the people reading the textbook and those watching the documentary are consuming information about bluebirds. Watching a video of people having sex and reading about it are also different experiences, but the subject being consumed does not change. Visual and written pornography are both pornography.
Google states this: Pornography and "smut" (erotic romance novels) both trigger the brain's reward centers and release arousal-related neurotransmitters like dopamine and oxytocin. However, porn provides instant, passive visual stimulation, often leading to rapid tolerance and over-stimulation. Smut novels require active, imaginative engagement, pacing the neurological response through emotional connection and narrative.
It's not feminist, it's just ridiculous. Feminism is about equality, and there are so many women out there saying that porn is bad while they read their smut... their argument is usually about how it provides unrealistic expectations about women during sex, then they read about the man who knows their body better than themselves, the domineering businessman that gives a life of luxury in exchange for submission, and the fish man who is apparently a great lover...
And it’s written material. usually tagged with content warnings, that is not actively harming real people. There is a clear difference you are not getting. Also the idea that everyone who does something illegal gets in trouble is a child’s dream. Sex trafficking is very much real and alive within the porn world. Pretending it’s not and that filmed pornography is somehow better than AO3 is actually so out of touch. I’m done with this conversation. You don’t live in reality.
Oh great you’re here with your google AI overview too. Couldn’t just keep it to one comment section. Once again, get better sources. You’re out here calling people gooners for reading smut though, so you don’t really deserve to engage in any kind of intellectual or respectful conversation.
I must have really struck a nerve just block me if you don’t like what I have to say because I’m gonna keep on stating it. You have yet to produce the names and the studies you are referring to. Then when I give you a synopsis of actually sources that can be found on Google you don’t accept it. Imma keep my beliefs you can’t change that.
You quite literally never asked for sources. You just want to talk over people and call them gooners. And if you can’t take the time to find something besides an AI overview, you don’t deserve to be putting people down for your objectively incorrect opinions. Judge somewhere else.
Age restrictions are completely different thing, and they are 100% the parents fault. I get what you’re trying to say, but it doesn’t add up because we have to take everything into account. If there is an age restriction, and the child does that follow it that is not the writer or the site‘s fault, especially if that child lied and put that they were an age older than they actually are.
I’m not defensive, but every single type of this media is easily accessible. Young girls are reading these books because we don’t have proper sex education for them either. That’s how I learned. I agree that young girls should not be reading dark erotica, but this is a platform in which young girls are not on. So the whole point of this argument belongs in spaces where it should be educating parents not on a Books thread on an app that is 18+ and meant for college students.
tbf a lot of stuff will *not* have an age restriction and is sometimes marketed towards minors when it’s porn or fetish content. though age ratings is a separate conversation with more tangible consequences than “hmmm does this have enough pages of sex to qualify as a porn book” (although tagging is still important)