Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
people need to realize that a book isn’t good/bad because you liked/disliked it. like, catcher in the rye is a great book and i absolutely hated it while kiss her once for me is not good and i loved it
upvote 204 downvote

🙀
Anonymous 6w

There was a good tumblr post about this!! (I can’t find it 😭) but basically they said you need to put it on an x and y axis where x is “how objectively good is this media” and y is “how much I enjoyed it”. With the optional z axis “how much did this affect my sanity”

upvote 59 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

or when someone hates a whole book because they don’t like a character that meant to be written like that. Like if you hate a character that means they wrote them well. Like when you hate a character in a movie it means they did a good job

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

Me with my “cringey” YA romance books.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

i think the catcher in the rye is a bad book because jd salinger failed to do something interesting with holden caulfield, like he forgot that the point of a story is for characters to experience some sort of development. the plot is also boring bc holden for pretty much the entire book refuses to do anything truly difficult, the events are super repetitive bc he just keeps pushing away the people who seem to care about him, and nothing ever actually gets resolved.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

I think if the prose and grammar is bad it can be construed as objectively bad in a certain aspect.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

So true. I usually end up with the phrase “I didn’t say it was good I said I liked it.” Because I’ll just say it; my taste is questionable at best. I find myself enjoying some books others hated and hating books others loved. There are also books that fall into categories of “this is wonderfully written but also is offensive garbage” (IYKYK), or “this book is a cultural phenomenon and yet it’s also shit”

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

I think we can all agree that some books legitimately suck. I have yet to meet one person who actually enjoyed The Time Machine by H. G. Wells

upvote 1 downvote
🍃
Anonymous 6w

I try to reinforce the phrase ‘for me’ with people in my life. For example, “Catcher in the Rye was not for me.”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

I think this is just a misunderstanding about semantics. When (most) people say “this book was bad” they’re (usually) referring to a subjective opinion about their enjoyment of the book, not an objective fact about the quality of the book (because such a thing does not exist)

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

Catch 22 🥀

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6w

i agree! you can like objectively terrible books and hate objectively good books. the important part is not letting your opinions cloud how you view the quality of the book

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> catdad 6w

This exactly

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

My best example is The Odyssey. It’s very good but I hated it

upvote 4 downvote
🙀
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6w

Because even if it’s objectively poorly written, even if it’s something you loathe, it can still be something your brain can’t help but obsess over

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

one of my favorite bookstagrammers gave it five stars lol

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 6w

Ain’t no way

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w
post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6w

This is another interesting one since the original odyssey was in Ancient Greek, so how objectively good it is could also depend on the translation. (Unless you read the entire thing in Greek in which case more power to you)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6w

Nah, I’ve read two different translations and while both were good, I honestly can’t stand most of the characters for some reason

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> catdad 6w

i agree to an extent, but there is also no absolute objective truth when it comes to the “goodness” of a book. like you can absolutely argue that catcher in the rye is not a good book, regardless of whether you enjoyed it

upvote 3 downvote
🙀
Anonymous replying to -> #9 6w

I mean, we can argue back and forth, but I think things like historical significance, public reception, all that, DOES contribute to more objectivity. It’s like people who argue if the Beatles were good or bad.

upvote 3 downvote
🍃
Anonymous replying to -> #11 6w

Catch 22 was for me!!❤️ But out of my entire AP Eng class, it was only for me!🤣

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5w

It’s a 3, maybe a 4, out of 5 at best. I wonder if they’ve seen the movie adaptation or just read the book

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 5w

I feel like he mentioned wanting to see the movie after reading the book but now I don’t remember for sure lol

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 5w

If he saw such deep meaning in the words, I feel Iike he’d hate the movie. It’s kinda like a fever dream that makes the meaning of the book look more weird and one-dimensional

upvote 1 downvote