
Prob start by reading primers & watching lectures tbh. If you don't alr have a decent grasp of logic I'd def get a handle on that first. Then approach the text and play around with it in your notes, cross compare them to other ppl's commentaries (Reeve's translation has footnotes), figure out how you think abt it & why by tracking the actual arguments. Everyone is diff tho, so there’s trial & error in figuring out what works best specifically for you. Just some general advice
Tbh, I get not wanting to go through all the lectures and extraneous resources. When I want to learn/remember a book well, I just have a journal open when I’m reading (yes even if you annotate on the book) to write some key thoughts, topics, and points. Then after a long reading session I’ll go back and add to the pages and sometime even write a mini essay/journal about it.
Oh well this is a book for mathematical/symbolic logic, that’s great if you’re in math (I am) but it’s not going to help you much with Aristotelian frameworks. If you want something for that, Kreeft has a decent layman oriented intro with exercises for the reader that’s pretty approachable for ppl starting out
Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy is always a nice site to touch base with, there’s this series called a very short introduction to with a sort of bleed through color type of covers for various thinkers and there’s one on Aristotle, also a Cambridge companion is nice but I’d read that when engaging with the primary works as something to bounce ideas off of personally