Personally, unless it’s a classic I think there should be spoiler warnings, and maybe even for classics. Kind of depends on how well known they are. Unless your job is to read then most people aren’t getting to books a month after they release and what about the people that discover the book through videos like that?
this is an unpopular opinion, but while I think it’s good practice and polite to put spoiler warnings on really everything, ultimately I think the responsibility is on the person who doesn’t want to be spoiled. if there’s media you don’t want spoilers for, be very careful / don’t engage with content about that media
I agree with this. If it’s a classic where it’s a classic because of the ending (ie romeo and Juliet) then I don’t think a trigger warning is necessary. otherwise, I think it’s just common courtesy. just because a book has been out for 100 years doesn’t mean I’ve found the time to read it yet. I find that argument nonsensical
if the spoiler is the very first thing (like a post saying “can’t believe ___ dies in ___”) no preamble, that’s a real dick move. I didn’t see that post so can’t give my opinion on it! in general though I just think that book discussion should be treated like it’ll contain spoilers by default, and spoiler-free spaces should have to be clarified.