Libraries have to buy a digital license from the publisher that functions similarly to a real book copy where it can only be loaned to one person at a time and after a certain number of uses it expires (like how real books get worn down / damaged / lost). If the book is popular, libraries have to buy multiple digital licenses. It’s all so that the company and author can still profit off the lending
I mean, they very much are being made. There’s a massive amount of labor that goes into a digital book - the author writing it, the publisher providing multiple stages of editing and editors, the publisher handling legal matters, advertising, etc. I would love if all books were freely and openly available, but we’d have to completely switch our model of how the industry works away from private companies.
plus with Amazon trying to move to a more streaming model, we’re seeing how they’re just further screwing over authors. I’m sure there’s a way it could be done, but it hasn’t been successfully implemented anywhere I’m aware of (my definition of successful includes fair compensation to the artists)
well first it’s because people listen to music more than they read books. you might listen to 50+ songs a day every day for weeks, but not many people are even reading one book a day. in the US, audio streaming platforms work on a pay-per-stream model, while libraries work on a pay-per-license. we *could* switch to pay-per-loan (like the UK), but that would mean libraries would have to have significantly more federal and state funding