Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Any poetry readers on here? I need y’all’s opinions- are viral poets like rupi kaur with no traditional structure or rhythm (basically stream of consciousness blurbs) ruining poetry or keeping it alive?
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

It’s kind of a hard thing to diagnose tbh. What rupi kaur did was revolutionary, for better or worse, in terms of structure, form, tone, and expectations in poetry. Although it doesn’t look like her poetry has a structure, it does. But because it looks simple and stream of consciousness, people think that anyone can do it. It’s kind of like a Jackson pollock. Yeah I could also make one but it’s not the same. I’m not saying anything original because I wasn’t the first to use that form and style.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I am not a huge fan of her work either but I agree, it’s worth recognizing that she has brought so many new readers into poetry. I think the Jackson pollock analogy is pretty spot on, as his work doesn’t really resonate with me either 😅 it also reminds me of the whole Laufey vs traditional jazz argument, I guess something being new/ different doesn’t disqualify it from a certain category.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I also say this as not a huge fan of her work. What she did was still really cool because it disrupted the norm, it makes us think about what poetry is. And she definitely brought in new readers which poetry needs! Poetry is beautiful but people tend not to read it or short stories anymore

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

So I guess she did both imo. She ruined an aspect of it but also brought it to new audiences to keep it alive

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Can you explain what you mean by her work being “revolutionary”? Other than it being new I’m not sure what you mean

upvote 1 downvote