In romance books (if done properly) it’s usually insta love which basically is love at first sight they instantly have feelings for each other. Insta lust is they’re immediately attracted to each other and will probably fuck within the first three chapters. I hate insta lust if I wanted lust I would go date a college frat guy.
Honestly, I don’t care whether it’s the reviewer or the publisher. I’m not going to dislike a book because of a reviewer’s marketing it based off tropes, but I am going to stand by my disdain for this way of recommendation no matter who it’s by, because the more we promote stories through these means, then the more they are going to be published with this intent.
Yes, I know. The problem is that when people recommend books based only off things that are either spoilers for or have no real impact on the story, the people who DO write and manager books see this and then base their marketing around that. Outside of this review, there are so many novels that are being marketing in terms of things like “spicy romantasy, enemies to lovers, grumpy/sunshine” and not their actual plot, and that’s partly because that’s how people have taken to recommending them.