poster of the meme/image here. I’d like to say I’m not saying that libraries are bad 𝘼𝙏 𝘼𝙇𝙇. I’ve loved libraries all my life and nothing will ever change that, and my local library is still how I experience 70% of my books (Audible is another big one for me) 𝘉𝘶𝘵 Hoopla is just a pain to use. It’s wildly inconsistent with what it has, particularly if you live in an area with a smaller library system.
Ok but how much of the money to buy the digital copy is even going to the author?? Ideally this whole system is set up so the author gets fairly compensated but that doesn’t always happen because this whole system is deeply flawed. There should be more copies available and if it weren’t for corporate greed on multiple levels there could be.
Especially as someone who uses audiobooks 95% of the time, sometimes my entire system only has 𝘰𝘯𝘦 copy of a specific title, recently for example that was Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir, it wasn’t on Hoopla and I didn’t want to wait over a month and a half on the waiting list. So I got it from Audiobook Bay. Obviously libraries are great and supporting them is wonderful, but Hoopla as an app is very subpar because of how it’s set up.
making the copies unlimited doesnt help the corporate greed issue though. i completely agree that authors probably dont see as much money as they should, but thats a problem on the publishing conpany's end, not the library or services that work with libraries to make borrowing more accessible
This whole thing is a perfect example of manufactured scarcity. There isn’t much of a limit on how many digital copies of anything we can have, but in order to keep a price tag on it there has to be limited supply. The scarcity does not exist we could give everyone access to almost any book with the technology we have we choose not to. The reason why we choose not to is because the money each person or library pays for a copy is supposed to go to everyone who worked on this book.
Only thing is a lot of that money actually goes to the seller (likely amazon) and not anyone who worked on it (I don’t know enough about publishing houses to comment on the share they get otherwise I would). There would be more copies available if there weren’t a manufactured scarcity to increase demand, each copy could be cheaper, we could overturn the system because of the new technology and figure out a different way to pay authors and editors and everyone who makes books.
The library does not choose how much a digital copy costs nor their budget for buying new books. If the library could get more copies they likely would. Also libraries don’t buy copies they buy licenses from publishers for certain amounts of time and publishers can decide to limit how many times that book can be checked out. It’s not libraries creating scarcity but there is a manufactured scarcity.
i think we're arguing with eachother about two different things... i agree that corprate greed is bad. thats an obvious fact. im really just saying we shouldnt be blaming libby or hoopla for what publishing companies are doing 😭 they have no say in what the publishing companies do, theyre just a service that makes borrowing stuff from a library database easier
I’m not sure about hoopla, but I think it’s overdrive (not publishers) that charges libraries an arm and a leg for each digital license. A library buys a physical copy for $30 or whatever and can use it until it falls apart whereas they have to spend $75 on a digital license with a two month check out run