
Oh, I agree. People with disabilities present in all different ways. My point was from me dealing with a co-worker who (we work with people with disabilities) described someone who was ambulatory as able-bodied. Which pissed me off because A) I hate the term and B) as you said walking doesn’t mean you’re not disabled. You don’t know someone. I can walk, but the rest of my body hates me. Yet I’m still able.
I think you might have a skewed view on the term able-bodied. Which is fine as a personal preference but it’s just a neutral term. Very “don’t call me cis!” It’s just “not physically disabled” in less words. Of course you’re still able to do things but that’s not what it’s referring to. It’s more “default settings of the body” if that makes sense?
“not having a physical disability” is the Only definition of “able-bodied”. if you yourself are physically disabled and someone describes you as able-bodied just because you can walk, then that’s them operating off of a reductive & flatly inaccurate misconception of what disability refers to, not a problem with the term itself
well no, #2 said you can have “a disability” (not “a physical disability”) and still be able-bodied, because cognitive / non-physical disabilities also exist. that’s the whole point of using the term “able-bodied” rather than “not disabled”, because to call someone “not disabled” when they Are cognitively disabled is to erase their disability