Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
There aren’t too many terms that bug me. I couldn’t care less if I’m called disabled or person with a disability. But able-bodied really irks me. Just say non-disabled. Person without disability.
upvote 20 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

Able-bodied ≠ non-disabled. You can still have other disabilities while being able-bodied

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

pre-disabled

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

🗣️🗣️

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6d

Generally able bodied means not having a disability, but there are some who use it differently. People use it as a descriptor but while I might be coined “able-bodied” because I can walk, most of my body works, that is an incorrect description. I’m just ambulatory.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5d

Ambulatory ALSO does not mean able-bodied or not disabled. I’m an ambulatory wheelchair user for example. Able-bodied just means you’re kind of a jerk for not giving your seat on a bus to a disabled person. You can be Able-bodied and have mental disabilities like autism, ADHD, etc

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5d

Oh, I agree. People with disabilities present in all different ways. My point was from me dealing with a co-worker who (we work with people with disabilities) described someone who was ambulatory as able-bodied. Which pissed me off because A) I hate the term and B) as you said walking doesn’t mean you’re not disabled. You don’t know someone. I can walk, but the rest of my body hates me. Yet I’m still able.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5d

I think you might have a skewed view on the term able-bodied. Which is fine as a personal preference but it’s just a neutral term. Very “don’t call me cis!” It’s just “not physically disabled” in less words. Of course you’re still able to do things but that’s not what it’s referring to. It’s more “default settings of the body” if that makes sense?

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4d

“not having a physical disability” is the Only definition of “able-bodied”. if you yourself are physically disabled and someone describes you as able-bodied just because you can walk, then that’s them operating off of a reductive & flatly inaccurate misconception of what disability refers to, not a problem with the term itself

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4d

My first point in response to #2 was it means not physically disabled but other people view it differently… (literally #2 said you can be able bodied and still have a physical disability)… how do I have a skewed view? Because I dislike the term? Eh… everyone has their preferences.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4d

well no, #2 said you can have “a disability” (not “a physical disability”) and still be able-bodied, because cognitive / non-physical disabilities also exist. that’s the whole point of using the term “able-bodied” rather than “not disabled”, because to call someone “not disabled” when they Are cognitively disabled is to erase their disability

upvote 1 downvote