Anonymous #2 4d

What was that?

5

Anonymous #2 4d

And what great delusion it is!

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Yeah, I don’t think that would’ve made a difference. Ouch.

0

Anonymous #6 4d

You don’t think UNC’s top leading scorers would’ve made a difference?

-1

Anonymous #4 4d

It was 24 points lil bro

5

Anonymous OP 4d

Caleb Wilson on his own averages 20 ppg lil bro 😂

-1

Anonymous #4 3d

Yeah, put him and Veesaar in, subtract the points by their replacements, and you still don’t make up 24 points.

0

Anonymous #6 3d

If zayden high could outplay your front court imagine the damage veesaar and Wilson would do

-1

Anonymous #4 3d

Too bad you didn’t have any guards for this hypothetical that wouldn’t brick threes

0

Anonymous #6 3d

Guards wouldn’t take 33 3s if they were playing genius

-1

Anonymous #4 3d

Probably shouldn’t have last night anyways, especially if your sex offender was so good.

0

Anonymous #6 3d

Your team let him drop a double double 😂 he’s not good

0

Anonymous #4 3d

Surely you kept it within 20, right?

0

Anonymous #6 3d

You’re the one hanging a banner for a meaningless win 2 starters down not me

0

Anonymous #6 3d

Nothing to cope about, the loss was so meaningless it didn’t even drop UNC’s seed line, but congrats on your 8th win in 23 years!

1

Anonymous #4 3d

I see it’s hitting your system good!

1

Anonymous #4 3d

“Nothing to cope about” proceeds to do the definition of coping

4

Anonymous OP 3d

Where’s the coping? I’m congratulating you on your big “statement” win! I know you don’t get to see them very often

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Like you don’t see ACC titles often?

1

Anonymous #4 3d

You think there was a reason we didn’t rush the court? I was a student sitting front row sideline and we didn’t rush because, while it was a big win point differential wise, it wasn’t a big win because the competition was so lackluster

4

Anonymous #6 3d

We hang banners for nattys but yall gotta fill up those empty rafters somehow so I get why you like to count ACC titles

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Keep coping pal. What does that have to do with the 24 point loss you endured last night?

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Yeah and why was the competition so lackluster? Because UNC was missing 46% of their scoring and 42% of their rebounding… you’re proving my point that it’s an asterisk win.

1

Anonymous OP 3d

What do ACC titles have to do with anything? You brought that shit up first

1

Anonymous #4 3d

An unbalanced team is a sign of a bad team. Our best player went out with a busted open head for half the game and our lead grew by 10 points.

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Yeah I’m so sure a team like Duke wouldn’t struggle against teams with no boozer or ngongba

1

Anonymous #4 3d

I bet they would play better than that sorry ass attempt at a game

1

Anonymous #4 3d

UNC actually did used to hang banners for ACC titles, back when they won them.

4

Anonymous #6 3d

Just won a title in 2024 btw

1

Anonymous #4 3d

For more information, Google “2024 ACC champions”

1

Anonymous #6 3d

We aren’t talking about ACC champions, we’re talking about titles, of which there are two, but nice attempt at moving the goal posts!

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Ay man congrats, but all I’m hearing is cope about last nights game.

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Ok, whatever makes you feel good, it’s still been a decade since you won it

1

Anonymous #6 3d

It’s been over 40 years since you’ve made a title game

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Again no coping! Congrats on your win*!

1

Lmfaooo you lost to Georgia tech at home

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Coping in that very same comment is beyond parody

4

Anonymous #6 3d

Not a cope when the selection committee will have the same asterisk next to that win

1

Anonymous #4 3d

Yeah, if it were decided by, like, five

1

Anonymous #4 3d

But speaking of the selection committee, I think it’s fine.

0

Anonymous #6 3d

No? When they look at a team sheet and see the score line there will 100% be something on there about veesaar and Wilson to devalue the quality. Metrics like NET, Kenpom, etc don’t factor in who plays in games so that actually means nothing

-2

Anonymous #4 3d

NET is literally the committee’s own tool. Not that I have to convince you though (I hope you’re not on the committee)

0

Anonymous #4 3d

The committees decisions about march madness seeding is a continuation of the NET rankings stupid

0

Anonymous #6 3d

Yeah so you have no idea what you’re talking about. The NET is an efficiency metrics calculator, it does not consider things like which players played and neither does Kenpom, doesn’t matter that the committee made it. So when they print out a team sheet they still list out each notable quad 1/2/3/4 wins and losses and the committee absolutely discusses extra context. You’re an idiot if you think the only thing the committee looks at is NET rankings regarding seeding and picking the field

-1

Anonymous OP 3d

It’s not, try again! The committee looks at all sorts of things including individual results, not just NET rankings, stupid. If that were the case why would we even need a selection committee your seed would just be your NET ranking

3