Anonymous #2 21w

h2h and whatnot

12

Anonymous #3 21w

💋🌹💥

1

No idea how you pulled that from my takes 😂 I would maybe believe that if Ohio State proved themselves but their schedule is so puss

31

i-

1

Anonymous OP 21w

Texas (10) beat OU (11) and Vandy (13). Lost to Ohio State (1) and Florida (unranked) and they all have the same W-L record. They’re exactly where they should be unless you believe OU and Vandy should also drop farther back, which isn’t a bad “the SEC is overrated argument”, but ppl keep complaining about TX and never mention OU or Vandy. But they’ll likely lose to Georgia (5) this week so who knows how they’ll tank versus Vandy and Oklahoma after that happens.

5

Anonymous #2 21w

Same answer I gave above. Texas (10) beat OU (11) and Vandy (13). Lost to Ohio State (1) and Florida (unranked) and they all have the same W-L record. They’re exactly where they should be unless you believe OU and Vandy should also drop farther back, which isn’t a bad “the SEC is overrated argument”, but ppl keep complaining about TX and never mention OU or Vandy. But they’ll likely lose to Georgia (5) this week so who knows how they’ll tank versus Vandy and Oklahoma after that happens.

5

Anonymous #14 21w

The loss to Florida should factor in more.

2

Why not try now

1

Indiana +20 vs OSU

1

Anonymous #12 21w

Which is fine but they proved on the field to be better than OU and Vandy and all 3 have the same record. So OU and Vandy should also drop farther back.

1

Anonymous #12 21w

Oh and also if we’re creating a standard where cherry picked losses mean more than why aren’t people complaining that Bama should drop more since they lost to Florida State.

1

Anonymous #14 21w

because tx sucks ass and got lucky those games. OU would’ve beaten them easily if their qb was healthy

0

I agree but people keep saying “why is Texas ranked 10” and the answer is actually really simple, it’s because OU is ranked 11th and Vandy 13th. Then someone says “the loss to Florida should hurt Texas more” and all I’m saying is that cherry picking losses can become arbitrary if it’s not applied equally across the board.

1