Anonymous #1 5d

So Even the NFL scouts have SEC bias? Hmm

1

Anonymous #1 5d

AI confirmation bias even though you can literally read the stats in that College Sports Network article. SEC is 562 while the BIG10 is 535

7

Anonymous #2 5d

Last time i checked 562 is more than 535

11

Anonymous OP 5d

Yeah you’re right, that’s why I’m on your side 😂

4

Anonymous #2 5d

Oh ok I think I misread your comment my fault 😂

1

Anonymous #3 5d

How so

0

Anonymous #4 4d

Point is the players in the conference aren’t trash or overrated like big 10 fans say if the sec has more active players in the nfl then any other conference

0

Anonymous OP 4d

No one thinks the sec is trash dude. We dont like how you assume your 2 loss teams are better than our 2 loss teams. Michigan and SC would handle Texas easily, but because Texas is SEC they’re ranked and SC and Iowa arent

0

Anonymous #4 4d

“Michigan and SC would handle Texas” hey what happened when Oklahoma played Michigan vs when Oklahoma played Texas

2

Anonymous #4 4d

Also, another hypothetical win for the big 10!!!

8

Anonymous OP 4d

What happened when ohio state played michigan? Rivalry games are one offs, you should know this. OU is so obviously better than texas kentucky and msst and michigan is better than week 2

1

Anonymous OP 4d

We didnt start the fire (sec invented the concept of a hypothetical)

1

Anonymous #4 4d

another hypothetical lmao

1

Anonymous OP 4d

By ranking texas and not iowa, the ap is participating in a hypothetical and not just evaluating resumes

1

Anonymous #4 4d

No, big 10 fans think only they’re allowed to use the hypothetical thing then get butthurt when sec fans do it

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Tell me the resumes say Iowa should be ranked over Texas

2

Anonymous OP 4d

Nah we’d prefer it if nobody used it, but there is no reason for iowa to be unranked and no reason for washington to be unranked in week 5. No one respects northern football

1

Anonymous OP 4d

5 point loss to indiana is elite, as good as a 7 point loss to osu. Now that oklahoma has 2 losses im not sure thats a great win for texas anymore

1

Anonymous #4 4d

And iowa state > florida also

1

Anonymous #4 4d

How is that possibly not a good win for them, name a win that Iowa or UW has that’s better

1

Anonymous OP 4d

They dont have great wins but they got elite losses, kinda like ole miss whos ranked (lsu and ou arent very good). I guess oregon is ranked highly but thats only because of preseason. If they started unranked like iowa they wouldnt be where they are

1

Anonymous OP 4d

USC is near top 10 in the predictive metrics btw (oregon is 3rd which is the other argument to have them high)

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Saying OU isn’t very good must not think Washington isn’t very good either because they lost by 3 TDs at home to OSU while Texas went on the road and lost by 7

1

Anonymous OP 4d

I think Washington and Texas are somewhat even, but we cant just go off of one game. Kentucky and MSST are awful, washington would blow them out based ok what they’ve done to the bottom of the big 10

1

Anonymous OP 4d

OSU wasnt really trying offensively in either game so even that ones hard to say

0

Anonymous #4 4d

Yet another hypothetical, Washington struggled to beat Maryland a similar team to MS State who I’d argue is better than Maryland, stop with the hypotheticals we have to go with what we’ve seen on the field

0

Anonymous #4 4d

“Wasn’t trying” ok this is maximum coping levels 😭

1

Anonymous OP 4d

Maryland is better than msst lol, arizona state is just cheeks

1

Anonymous OP 4d

“On the field” like when texas struggled with kentucky and utsa or whatever creampuff they couldnt blow out in week 2. Texas is just as pathetic as penn state and clemson imo

1

Anonymous #4 4d

How is Maryland better than Ms State, yet ANOTHER HYPOTHETICAL

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Nothing on the resume suggests Maryland is better than MS state, not that UW is better than Texas, Iowa you can make an argument for but their best win is 5-3 minnesotan

0

Anonymous OP 4d

The AP quite literally is a hypothetical, thats why one voter moved florida up after losing. Sec bias and hypotheticals are insane atp

1

Anonymous #4 4d

BRO YOU LITERALLY JUST USED 3 HYPOTHETICALS TO SUGGEST MARYLAND AND WASHINGTON ARE BETTER THAN TEXAS AND MS STATE 😭😭😭 the hypocrisy is insane

1

Anonymous OP 4d

Even georgia beat kentucky by 1 last year. The sec is just down admit it. No one in there has a chance vs osu or indiana, or maybe even oregon based on analytics

0

Anonymous #4 4d

Ok atp I’m convinced this is rage bait there is no way you’re this slow

0

Anonymous #4 4d

Now bro bringing up Last year what are you even talking about atp

1

Anonymous OP 4d

Why is oregon above every sec team in every predictive metric? Maybe bama is ahead by one spot in one of them. This is embarrassing for Sankey lmao

1

Anonymous OP 4d

Once again, i dont have a problem with hypotheticals. As someone who didnt invent them, i will gladly use them

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Ok yeah ur trolling respectable troll honestly you got me

1

Anonymous OP 4d

🤝

3

Anonymous #4 4d

Get to winning what? The south has almost all of the natties from the last 20 years. Also the majority of important players r black anyway so that white ppl north v south bs doesn’t even matter.

6

Anonymous #5 4d

Then why do southerners feel the need to talk nonstop about how the big 10 has no depth and our 5-2 teams are fraudulent but fsu is somehow great because we HAVE to prop up bama

1

Anonymous #5 4d

Also nil hasnt been legal for 20 years so only the last few years actually matter

1