Anonymous #1 1w

you are wildly misinformed

105

Anonymous #5 1w

"We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.” -Kirk, 2024

196

Anonymous #5 1w

“Prowling blacks go around for fun to target white people - that’s a fact” - him in 2023😭

167

Anonymous #2 1w

fr talking about how life was better under segregation

53

Anonymous #3 1w

#context

17

Anonymous #6 1w

there was actually representation of this on a train in Charlotte yesterday.

42

Anonymous #1 1w

how was he racist are you able to explain or are you just a dumbass that believes whatever you see on the internet

-18

Anonymous #10 1w

Not like he said if he had a black pilot he would assume he’s not qualified because “DEI” as if a black pilot doesn’t have to pass the same stringent requirements as any other pilot. That’s just scratching the surface let me know if you want more.

62

Anonymous #5 1w

I’m sure you would say that but luckily I don’t care what you think.

8

Anonymous #1 1w

It seems they’ve been proven wrong and are unable to speak up 😦

16

Anonymous #11 1w

i fear they just commented one minute ago. at least give them a minute to comment back and if they don't, yall won

3

Anonymous #2 1w

13% 50

-2

Anonymous #14 1w

Thank you for proving my point about Charlie, fantastic job

1

Anonymous #14 1w

I’m sure you’d like to ignore the fact that African Americans live in poverty at higher rates, have worse access to education and that redlining was a thing? You do know people in poverty commit crimes at higher rates don’t you?

10

Anonymous #9 1w

I mean your comment is just as bad. The dude who killed that woman on the train deserves to go to jail or the psychiatric unit for the rest of his life. Nobody is demanding his freedom or defending what he did though.

13

Anonymous #1 1w

there's no way of defending his freedom. it was literally a race target. he said "i got that white girl" twice. it was an exact representation of what his target was, mentally ill or not.

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

it sucks that there is a statistic and that he added to it, but there's a reality and people have caused these realities, and the same is for the whites targeting blacks, vice versa other races

-2

Anonymous #9 1w

So why was there a way to defend what happened to George Floyd or Kendrick Johnson? Or Ahmaud Arbery?

11

Anonymous #1 1w

the only name i know is george floyd, so im not educated enough on the other topics to even talk about that with you. also, that isn't a statistic of a black targeting a white. thats a white targeting a black, so that doesnt account for this either??

0

Anonymous #1 1w

as i said, there's a statistic for other races going for other races. youre just choosing to pick that statistic and not the one that was discussed and the evidence i represented

0

Anonymous #9 1w

Yeah my point was it’s always straight to the point when people see black on white but if it’s white on black there is always a narrative that the black individual deserved it for some reason.

7

Anonymous #9 1w

What evidence. Dude is a documented schizophrenic. I have no problem with it being classified as a hate crime or “black on white” there’s nothing else to talk about.

10

Anonymous #1 1w

well i'm not someone who beats around the bush. if it's injustice it's injustice. i'm not the one who would've given you what you were looking for.

0

Anonymous #9 1w

Right but you’re also saying Charlie Kirk was correct in spreading this form of thinking… so you’re against injustice but you support how Charlie Kirk positioned his arguments to make it seem as if there’s a race war or that black people are going around targeting white people as a whole….

2

Anonymous #1 1w

there is a race war. there has been since the civil rights act. not everyone is against each other, but there's racism everywhere. also, you can interrupt his remarks how you want without context. and even then, some are going to interrupt how they want. as anyone with life experience, it's obvious not everyone in one singular race is going to target everyone in another singular race.

-1

Anonymous #9 1w

Race war since the civil rights act???

2

Anonymous #1 1w

He’s delusional, thinks everyone’s out to get him

7

Anonymous #11 1w

oh yes because i'm just one singular race. i cover the entire population of one☺️☺️ if you look at any social media thread, there tends to be an argument based on race no matter the thread between someone who is black and white. i guess it's not a "race war" because it's not violent, but it's not peace either.

-1

Anonymous #9 1w

So… race war or the result of unchecked racism

3

Anonymous #1 1w

take whichever argument you want to run with. it's either one race killing the other which is seen as a hate crime and could be added to "race war" or it's unchecked racism in a comment section. either or, kirk's argument wasn't invalid and could be proven with events. he's wrong to not out the other side of the bridge, but his statement isn't incorrect

0

Anonymous #9 1w

His statement is incorrect. Black people are not prowling for white people to kill. There are black people that kill white people. Verbiage matters and the fact you don’t see it tells me a lot of things must get past you. As I said, he also used this to imply an attack on white people on a national scale. Also not true. So you saying he’s not incorrect because he’s kind of telling the truth doesn’t make sense to me. It’s fear mongering in the plainest form.

18

Anonymous #1 1w

Oh uh but wait I thought if someone kills someone of a different race it means america is in the middle of a race war uhhh

5

Anonymous #1 1w

He held pretty mainline moderate republican views.

-2

Anonymous #7 1w

What context could possibly make either of the comments listed not racist?

21

Anonymous #3 1w

Ur so out of touch w humanity 😭 I bet people u know and love have said some pretty awful things before. Should they leak blood infront of you too??

-2

Anonymous #18 1w

Probably

4

Anonymous #18 1w

That's more than pretty awful... he also made it his life's purpose and the source of his income to belittle every marginalized group possible and cheer on the death of children here and abroad. He's openly admitted to being okay with his children being raped, murdered, and being stripped of basic civil rights. This isnt an issue of basic disagreement. Dude fucking sucked and died doing what he loved. Saying racist shit and commandeering a conversation about gun violence in the worst direction.

5

Anonymous #2 1w

Why is that though? You’re right it is systematic. The constant theme is that while it isn’t every black person, it is always a black person. Is it culture? Or what?

0

Anonymous #11 1w

It isn’t all black people by any means, but it is always a black person. Always. You can come at me for why that is or still talk about slavery 300 years ago. The fact still remains is that it black culture is synonymous with violence at this point

0

Anonymous #14 1w

In the past few days every shooting has been committed by a white male. White males by far commit the most mass shootings in america. And yet somehow mass shootings arent considered a white male problem. Makes you wonder why

1

Anonymous #14 1w

A naval academy was just shot up today by guess who? Guess who shot up a school yesterday? Guess who shot charlie? Guess who shot up a Catholic school while children prayed? I could continue on for hundreds and hundreds of cases

1

Anonymous #2 1w

lol naval academy was a false alarm

1

Anonymous #15 1w

There’s video of a victim being carried away but sure, one less case out of the hundreds.

1

Anonymous #7 1w

what context could there POSSIBLY be that makes that statement okay

3