
I think the poll is supposed to be based on how good their past resume is, betting line is intended to be more predictive of future performance. If ranked team A outgained unranked team B by 200 yards but lost by 3 due to a fluke fumble touchback or something, they’d drop in the poll but probably wouldn’t in the next week’s betting lines.
Yeah but if a team has the same record as another team, how are they not ranked above if they are considered a better team, who’s expertise is more respected? The AP poll or the sportsbook? Just unusual to see so many ranked teams not be favored in their matchup against unranked teams
That’s just what the AP poll is supposed to be in theory. In reality there are some aftereffects of the preseason poll that linger for a while. Michigan being ranked in the preseason poll but not Washington / USC / other teams is an example of this. The problem is just that voters behave the same way when AP rankings are based on nothing as they do in like week 12 instead of having more kneejerk reactions to wins/losses earlier on