Anonymous #2 3w

That’s a solid 50% of the game where he did absolutely nothing

22

Anonymous #3 3w

Maybe cus it wasn't a td? U know the rules of the game ?

10

Anonymous #3 3w

Wdym overturned a TD? It was ruled a fumble on the field. Also there was an entire half after that where he did nothing, if he was THAT mentally affected by that call that’s on him more than the refs

14

Anonymous OP 3w

It was ruled a fumble but should have been a touchdown. Every replay showed Arnold was over the line before the fumble. It should have been 17-0. If you can’t get a blatant call why would you play to win. You can say should have - Could have- Would have, now that the game is over, but it matters when the players see officials being blatantly biased.

-3

Anonymous OP 3w

😂😂

1