Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Absolute Facts. There is literally no point in a conference if you aren’t going to play every team in the conference every year. Notre Dame has played UGA 2 more times than A&M has since they joined the SEC. They might as well be in different conferences.
Conference expansion is a cancer on this sport
upvote 76 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

You’re correct. We need to return to smaller, regional conferences

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

There used to be the SEC east and west divisions, I'm not sure why they merged those, maybe for variety I suppose

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Or divisions need to come back

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

It was “to get the two best teams” cause usually the west was a lot better. But now it’s impossible to know the 2 best teams when not every team plays each other.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Texas A&M was excluded due to tiebreakers but also hadn’t played any of the tying teams. It seems like the right decision in hindsight, but it’s still bonkers to think about.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Yeah, in my opinion neither the ACC or SEC got the 2 best teams in the conference championship

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Who would you have had?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Hindsight- ole miss. At the time- A&M. But the fact that you can even can argue/have tiebreakers shows how dumb the setup is.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Yes!! Why did we get rid of divisions??

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

The answer is both. 16+ team conferences will still have a ton of problems even with divisions.

upvote 1 downvote