Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Georgia Tech and Tulane EACH have more SEC championships than Kentucky, Miss St, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, TAMU, South Carolina, Missouri, and Vandy combined.

untold_westvirginia

Europe as zero SEC championships btw 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
upvote 171 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Yeah cause Oklahoma and Texas just joined?

upvote 24 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 20h

Both Georgia Tech and Tulane were in the SEC for longer than Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, and Texas A&M have been btw

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

Only losers make excuses.

upvote 12 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

vandy, miss st, and kentucky been here since the start, what's their excuse

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 21h

Second this for Mizzou and A&M

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 20h

Agree about a lot of those other schools tho lol

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 19h

Only losers make excuses.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 19h

And?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 18h

only losers have to skew data to make a point.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 17h

I don’t think you understand what “skew” means.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

Buddy I used it correct. You dont have to falsify data for it to be skewed. If you need it in simpler terms its called “cherry-picking”. I used “skew” over “cherry-picking” because if you were just cherry picking you couldve found more relevant examples instead of including meaningless ones.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

If you are incapable of figuring out what “skew” means then you have bigger problems than counting SEC trophies.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15h

Nothing is Cherry-picked, either. You should really learn what words and expressions mean before you try to use them.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

You picked examples which have no relevance, because the schools have only just joined the SEC. You did so for the sole purpose of having a longer list to make your point. That is textbook cherry-picking. There are more relevant schools you could have included but chose to exclude because that would make your pitiful list smaller.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 6h

I listed every single current member of the conference that has not won a championship. That’s quite literally the opposite of cherry picking. Like I said, learn what an expression means before you try to use it. Go ask your sistermom for help if it gets too difficult for you.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3h

And two of them just joined it yesterday? That’s like calling Texas State terrible because they’ve never won the PAC-12. Give them some time man

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3h

They’ve had more of a chance to win it? Obviously? Fake numbers, but If GT played 30 seasons in the SEC and Vandy has only played 15, obviously GT is more likely to have more championships.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3h

I didn’t call anyone terrible. Seems like you came to that determination all on your own.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3h

What does that have to do with the reality that none of those teams have won an SEC Championship?

upvote 0 downvote