Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Hot take: If the college football playoff expands to 24 all g6 schools who win their conference with fewer than 3 losses should make the field.
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

They absolutely would. It’d be like basketball where every conference winner gets a bid

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

So 2 or fewer losses

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

If

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

Hell no

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Genuinely, ur a hater

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Why not? Seeing the MAC champion upset a 9-3 SEC team would feed families

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Jmu vs Oregon last yr was a rlly good game. I think had they played ole miss instead, it woulda been even closer. Tulane was just poopoo.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Ya, no we’ve gotta get the best teams in. I maintain that they shouldn’t even be in the same league

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Wouldn’t happen

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Dude theres already precedent for g6 teams doing well. Boise state nearly knocked off texas.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Ya I mean big underdogs aren’t always gonna perform well that’s the nature of the sport. Hell, even Texas Tech and Alabama both just laid down and died in the playoffs last year

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Boise state has literally never played Texas in history

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

That was Arizona State

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Mb but still

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Oh for sure. ASU was supposed to get ran through that game and they competed and even had a chance to win

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Boise a good team. Jmu was a good team as well. The fact that they dont get to play power conference teams as much is not their fault.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

I look at teams like 2025 UVA,JMU,BYU; 2026 oklahoma state, louisville. Even teams like boise western michigan, and NDSU. g6 may not be over the hump rn. But give it time.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

It doesn’t need time it needs money that it doesn’t have

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

Definitely not. JMU has only been up a few years and good P4 teams don’t want to risk playing a good G6 team so their out of conference has probably been slim pickings

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Expanding to 24 teams should benefit g6 more than power conferences in that way. Look at what happened when we went to 12. Miami would not have been in the championship had it not been 12. Now what i CAN get behind is schools not playing fcs teams.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Ball knower

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

FBS teams pay a lot of money to FCS schools for that game. That money is critical for those smaller programs. You can’t get rid of those games without severely impacting FCS squads

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 15h

I disgree on this one. Thats why the idea for schools paying smaller shools for players that they developed comes in. Fcs is a different league so it doesnt make sense for fbs to play fcs. G6 is still fbs

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

I don’t necessarily disagree that FBS schools shouldn’t play FCS schools but that payday for most FCS schools is needed for the program’s sustainability

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 15h

Thats why fbs power conference schools should pay those smaller schools for their players.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

Well that’s an interesting proposition I haven’t thought about. I don’t have an opinion on that right now tbh I’ve never thought of it

upvote 1 downvote