Anonymous #1 1d

Alabama has 2 losses. UCLA has *checks notes* no losses. Alabama shouldn’t be above Notre Dame, Miami, Texas, or Tennessee either

1

Anonymous OP 1d

The rankings aren’t just all the teams in order of record. You’re thinking of standings.

1

Anonymous #2 1d

They LOST to Tennessee. The CFP is treating the Bama-Georgia game as if both teams won

1

Anonymous OP 1d

UCLA hasn’t played a team as good as Tennessee so that game is irrelevant when comparing the two teams. Georgia is ahead of Alabama. They’re respecting the results of that game. Alabama losing to Georgia doesn’t mean they’re worse than UCLA. That doesn’t make any sense.

1

Anonymous #2 1d

UCLA hasn’t lost a game wtf do you want them to do? So tired of the ScHeDuLe talk. If two teams have similar losses okay go ahead and talk about the schedule. When it’s an undefeated G6 vs P4 with a loss talk about the schedule. When it is an undefeated P4 against another P4 with a HORRIBLE loss or a 2-loss P4 team IDGAF about the schedule. Win your fucking games

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Hey man I don’t know if you know this or not but it based on the best teams not the most deserving

1

Anonymous OP 15h

2 losses better than anyone UCLA has played. UCLA doesn’t have to do anything, they’re just not going to get the same treatment as teams who play good teams. Their only ranked game has been against woeful Oregon and they won by 2.

1

Anonymous #2 15h

Why even play the games then. Just give the SEC the top 4 teams and call it a day. Don’t even have a college football season. Why waste time when the outcomes don’t matter?

1