Anonymous #1 1d

Yup that same Oregon. LSU and Ole Miss should not be sniffing the top 10. Only reason they are is because that’s where the pundits thought they were before a single snap was played.

3

Anonymous OP 1d

LSU and Ole miss both have a top 10 win in their resume. Oregon lost to unranked Oklahoma State. I can’t tell if you are rage baiting or genuinely this ignorant

4

Anonymous #1 1d

Ole Miss was against LSU and LSU was against Texas A&M. They’re pure definition of the SEC circle jerk. All of them are overrated to make them look better. You are falling for the SEC propaganda.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

I don’t usually go for the whole my conference is better than your conference wars, I hate the majority of teams in the sec. The exact same argument can be said about USC, whose only wins being against non power schools, being ranked 12. Oregon has not showed anything impressive this season, a shootout to unranked Boise state, getting statistically dominated by Oklahoma state. There are some obvious causations about Oregon, they are frauds

1

Anonymous #1 1d

I mean… LSUs ranked win is no longer ranked and both OSU and Boise State are… the amount that pre season rankings affect the rest of the season is definitely a problem. If no team had been ranked at all until today, Ole Miss and LSU would both be outside the top 15 and instead they are both top 11

1

Anonymous OP 1d

I don’t think you are comprehending, all of your arguments are hypocritical. Oklahoma State and Boise being boosted into rankings were heavily boosted due to their performance against a ‘preseason number 2 Oregon’. Oregon has the talent to be exceptional, they always do, they could put it together at anytime but ranking are not based on hypotheticals. Rankings are based on current resumes. There is no way you watch Oregon and think that is a top 10 team

1