Anonymous #1 13h

MAGA IS the entire party lmao 😭

1

Anonymous #2 13h

Practically at this point

1

Anonymous #3 13h

“The libtards want everyone to be able to afford food and shelter so that must be a bad thing!”

5

Anonymous #1 13h

211 republicans voted against releasing the Epstein files prior to them finally agreeing when Trump finally was ready for them to release them. They are fucking dogs.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

It’s also the final end goal of the Republican Party since its inception

1

Anonymous #2 13h

Idk I don’t think the party at its core was meant to be the way it became

1

Anonymous OP 13h

Alright well those people r actually just horrible

1

Anonymous #3 13h

The democratic leadership needs to go but actual progressives are making a come back. See Graham Platner, see Ro Khanna, see James Talerico. If you think it’s completely fucked get your gun and get ready to fight because that’s the only viable option left.

0

Anonymous #1 13h

It is 100% at their core. The cruelty is the point.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

270 republicans total. That’s 59 total politicians who didn’t vote to protect pedophiles multiple times and never forget JD Vance broke a tie vote the first time they voted on this subject.

1

Anonymous OP 13h

Oh you like democrats? Name your top 5 favorite acts of mass murder they committed

10

Anonymous OP 13h

If you cant youre not a real fan

1

Anonymous #2 13h

Of the Republican Party? I have to disagree there

1

Anonymous OP 13h

I think that it’s unbelievable horrible, i wouldn’t be surprised if Trump bribed them lol

1

Anonymous #4 13h

I like progressives. None of the democrats we’ve had in the last 50 years are progressives they are establishment bought and paid for. I always voted progressive I supported progressive. If you wanna talk mass murder I can bring up the hundreds of shootings done due to right wing extremists.

6

Anonymous #1 13h

You can disagree but their policies offer no real solutions except for assisting the rich and they have their base believing that the issue is some magical “other” when they themselves are the issue. And the Democrats are too cowardly to oppose them because they often agree with those terrible policies.

1

Anonymous #2 13h

The current democratic leadership are toothless Zionists who need to be primaried out of the party. There are progressive voices coming up in the Democratic Party who go against these cowards and hypocrites

3

Anonymous #2 13h

I think we’d have to look deeply into each policy to figure out if it truly could help or not, some are based on if it’s a “perfect world” and it’s not one. At this point in time, most politicians fend for themselves and make themselves more rich

1

Anonymous OP 13h

I think we need to have more qualified politicians in general but it’s all nepotism and bias in the first place

1

Anonymous #1 13h

I’d argue nearly all conservative policies spit in the face of the values this country was built on.

1

Anonymous OP 13h

Like which?

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Abolishing separation of church and state Allowing child marriage Banning abortions Deregulation corporations and businesses which harms consumers and the environments they operate Targeting the freedom to have a gay marriage or to be trans Restricting immigrants or outright just closing the border entirely Laws that target minorities

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Nearly every policy they push is about separation, banning something, or allowing cults to have a say in our government and therefor our laws.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

They don’t believe in actual freedom. They believe in “their” freedom.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Oh and let’s not forget SUPPORTING AI OVER ACTUAL ARTISTS. Since they REFUSE to regulate this dangerous new technology that’s robbing people skilled people of work they spend nearly their entire lives honing their craft for.

1

Anonymous OP 13h

I don’t agree that all of these policies pose the ideal of separation and banning certain things. These are mostly extreme cases. Conservatism, at its core, advocates for freedom of religion and protecting religious liberties from government overreach, not establishing a state religion. The goal of deregulation and free enterprise is to encourage innovation and lower costs for consumers by promoting competition. But I understand how it seems as though monopolies would have even more overreach.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

For immigration, there is a difference between wanting to enforce existing laws for a secure, legal immigration system and outright closing the border entirely.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

We have modern day monopolies!

1

Anonymous OP 13h

I agree and they should be regulated

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Not every single republican out there is inherently evil. Same with democrats. I think that’s some of them ruin both sides representation and have extremes

1

Anonymous #1 13h

I don’t think they are evil but I do think they are stupid. And or misinformed. And the data backs that up fully.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Scratch that. I don’t think they are ALL evil. I definitely think some are actually evil.

1

Anonymous OP 13h

I don't think it's fair to call people stupid just for having a different political philosophy. People arrive at conservative principles through completely different, but still entirely logical, viewpoints. You can completely disagree with those priorities without writing off the intelligence of the millions of people who hold them.

1

Anonymous #1 13h

Dude it’s not just a political philosophy it speaks VOLUMES of your character. Every policy that you actively support does in every way speak for who you are as a person. Not just your “political ideology” your political ideology is shaped by your foundational values and morality. If the shit that’s going on wasn’t enough to break away from this party. There is no hope for you. You’re too far gone. (Not you exactly just a way of speaking for anyone who’s still supporting this)

1

Anonymous #1 12h

You cannot call yourself a “freedom loving American” and then deny women the right to an abortion for rape or incest. Which they’ve banned in: Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas. That number should be 0 not fucking 9.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

I agree that politics reflects our core values, but people weight those values differently. Someone might prioritize economic freedom, decentralization, or traditional institutions not out of malice, but because they genuinely believe those principles lead to the best outcomes for everyone. Disagreeing on the mechanism to help society doesn't automatically mean someone lacks morality or character.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

I completely understand the contradiction. My point wasn't that every policy outcome is perfect or beyond criticism. It’s just that the people voting for these representatives often have a completely different framework for how they prioritize rights, rather than just acting out of malice or stupidity

1

Anonymous #1 12h

I cannot and will not ever outweigh economic freedom over basic social freedom.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

That’s a completely fair stance, and it makes total sense why you'd draw the line there. I mean I feel the same way people should have their basic needs met. But different people have entirely different hierarchies of what freedoms matter most, and those priorities shape how they vote.

1

Anonymous #1 12h

It’s a flawed framework because the hypocrisy is literally staring them in the face and they refuse to acknowledge it.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

It’s flawed throughout the entire system, not just on one side. Any framework is going to look completely broken to the other side when there is hypocrisy

1

Anonymous #1 12h

The buck stops there for me when it comes to policies. I already don’t agree with MOST conservative/Republican policies. But forcing a mother to bear their rapists child or their abusers child. Or leave the state? I can’t imagine the logical gymnastics required to see that as morally acceptable.

1

Anonymous #1 12h

80% of the country believes in a universal healthcare system. And getting rid of these healthcare insurance companies that literally work against their clients and legally kill millions every year. Yet only one side actually talks about this issue.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

It’s incredibly traumatic, and that’s a valid point. Honestly I dont even know what it takes to get someone to that conclusion, I think it’s horrible

1

Anonymous OP 12h

One side views healthcare as a public right (which personally i agree with), while the other side views market competition and deregulation as the best way to lower costs of it. It's not that the other side ignores healthcare, they just reject the government run system as the solution

1

Anonymous #1 12h

60% to 80% of Americans believe in higher taxations on corporations and the ultra wealthy. Which side has been cutting taxes for them for decades? Tax break after tax break after tax break. Cutting regulations, cutting environmental protections. It sure as shit isn’t the democrats.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

You're right on the history of tax policy, the push for deregulation and corporate tax cuts has absolutely been a core pillar of the Republican platform for decades. My point isn't that both sides have the exact same platform but rather that the overall political framework is broken because it allows a party to consistently pass policies that majorities oppose. And the other side often lacks the power or consensus to permanently reverse them.

1

Anonymous #1 12h

So they reject most of modern society. Like they always do and think they have some sort of solution nobody else has thought about. Yeah the data says otherwise but these people don’t deal in facts they deal in vibes and feelings. Hence the anti vax nonsense.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

Tbh the media really does not help with this at all. When one side completely drops out of the shared factual reality, it makes any kind of debate or reform impossible. The framework can't function when we can't even agree on basic facts or what constitutes real evidence

1

Anonymous #1 12h

I fully believe in tearing the whole thing apart. Going back to grassroots politics and taxing the living shit out of the billionaires and corporations who own most of the wealth in the country. But not until they are all investigated and properly prosecuted for their ties and connections with one Jeffrey Epstein.

4

Anonymous #1 12h

We live in a post truth society and it’s insanely dangerous

5

Anonymous OP 12h

I 100000000% agree with you. The fact that they’re still in fucking office is beyond me. But honestly we do need to uproot the whole system, though I think democracy as it is rn is the best thing we’ve got so far

1

Anonymous OP 12h

Incredibly, especially with AI distorting reality

1

Anonymous #1 12h

And again. Only one side is calling for regulation for these AI companies and the punishment for misinformation, identity theft, defamation and misrepresentation. That alone is enough for me to stay firmly left wing. Among other things but that’s a huge one.

1

Anonymous #1 12h

If you agree we should tear it down and start proper democracy again. Look into Graham Platner. He’s got the right ideas

1

Anonymous OP 12h

That focus on accountability is exactly why a lot of people land on the left. Tech companies shouldn't have a free pass to distort reality. Protecting consumer data and digital integrity is going to be one of the biggest battles for our democracy moving forward.

5

Anonymous OP 12h

I think it would be nearly impossible to do it though

1

Anonymous #1 12h

The largest battle in humanity’s history id say. And one we’ve been warned about a countless number of times. Drilled into our skulls. And yet… still those powerful enough did it anyway.

1

Anonymous OP 12h

It’s 100% to distract us so they can make themselves richer

3

Anonymous OP 11h

When did we have proper democracy? What time points or eras are you referring to specifically?

1