Anonymous #3 22h

You accepting it is the difference.

5

Anonymous #1 22h

neither of those guys could do shit. What you want is Timothy McVey.

5

Anonymous #4 22h

Eh correct me if I’m wrong but McVeigh was more a symptom. Classic story of a vet being stripped of his livelihood and wanting to correct the system for doing it but not thinking enough (accidentally taking out children in his vendetta). John Brown I believe is better suited for our current situation. Dude knew who was the problem. Went to their homes. Killed them in their yards.

4

Anonymous #5 21h

Whoa dude. No need to be so heated. If you’re as smart as you think you are let’s have an intelligent, calm conversation where we rely on the facts of our debate and not pointless, valueless name calling. I mean…if you’re right then we both agree, if you’re not, maybe we find some common ground or just agree to disagree

8

Anonymous #1 21h

This post is ignorant as fuck though, do you agree? It’s not even saying anything lol

-3

Anonymous #5 20h

Well no shit it’s probably to rage bait people, which if so then it successfully did lol. But doesn’t mean we can’t have constructive conversation about what we THINK it means or what we think is applicable.

7

Anonymous #5 20h

you are aggressive. and mean. fuck off and do something better with your evening 🌚

5

Anonymous #2 20h

Bots. Create confusion and distract. At some point it might be deemed insanity to mention these files again.

3

Anonymous OP 19h

🪳

1

Anonymous #5 19h

No one said anything about trump, calm down magat

5

Anonymous #1 18h

I don’t really buy that he accidentally took out kids, if you go somewhere with a bomb, you know what a bomb is going to do. It is not a precision instrument. Either way I just don’t think John Brown would be the right man for the job. He was blunt and direct, he knew he wouldn’t live his situation and did it in spite of that fact. Balls, but for the elites that exist you can’t use a precision weapon. Not without drawing to much attention before finishing future jobs. Look what the Italian did.

6

Anonymous #4 17h

I mean in his interviews he says that’s the cost of doing business. They weren’t the first people to lose loved ones and they won’t be the last. But when it came to the kids specifically I don’t think he intended for them to die. He stated he didn’t know there was a daycare. Why admit to everything else but then lie about that. Seemed to take the stance: I didn’t know there was a daycare, didn’t know it was gonna happen, but the fact that it did happen doesn’t change the message.

2

Anonymous #1 17h

I don’t think death meant the same thing to JB that it did to you. It was worth it to him and thankfully it led to a civil war that made a lot of needed civil change.

4

Anonymous #6 17h

thank you 💋

1

Anonymous #1 15h

My point is, to cut out cancer sometimes you have to take out something important. And that excuse from Mr. McVey is poppycock. If you bring a bomb to something, you risk killing a lot of innocent people. How do you go through all the steps of meticulous planning and not know a daycare was there? How?

4

Anonymous #1 15h

I mean it’s not something in my control to change unless I get into politics

3

Anonymous #4 15h

Cause he didn’t plan meticulously lol. He planned haphazardly with the information he scraped off the surface just like most people these days doing “research”. “Claude, which building shall I strike first?” /s

6

Anonymous #3 15h

Do you have the ability to speak to your neighbors. To find community? To build community? To organize under one mission? To accomplish that mission? I think you have a lot more power than you think. It just takes a lot of time and there are too many shiny things taking your attention away from that fact.

0

Anonymous OP 8h

You are insane and the files are an obvious hoax. Maybe you’ll get him someday 🤣🤣 it’s been 10 years but maybe someday, you clown ass bitch lol

-2

Anonymous #5 7h

They aren’t a hoax dude. The mere fact the files went from ‘on my desk’ to ‘they don’t exist’ to releasing a few and redacting information that shouldn’t have been redacted and then the reveal of the fact that there are millions of files and that there are still 3 million to be released!! That shows that something is getting covered up and people are being protected from committing horrible crimes

1

Anonymous #6 7h

You are a conspiracy theorist. You don’t even know what you’re talking about. I laugh at your bitch ass lol

-2

Anonymous #5 7h

and you get off on supporting creeps

0

Anonymous #5 7h

I’m really not dude, I’m a realist and I’m looking at the facts of this case.

2

Anonymous #6 7h

#5, do you remember that South Park Mormon episode theme. Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb AI(or FBI).

4

Anonymous #6 6h

No you’re not

4

Anonymous OP 6h

You’re a conspiracy theorist, that’s what you TDS idiots have been reduced to, because he WON lol

3

Anonymous OP 6h

i like this fight pls proceeeddddd

4

Anonymous #5 6h

That’s an insane statement. I understand he won, I don’t deny he won. I frankly don’t give a shit if he is in the files or not. What I really care about is the other people implicated in the files that were labeled as co conspirators and had their names illegally redacted as to not ‘expose’ them. There are people implicated in this massive crime that have yet to seen any justice and it is important to prosecute every single person who was involved in this. The files are much bigger than trump.

1

Anonymous #6 6h

Again you are the only one talking about trump in this discussion. You are relating him to the files in your mind first before anyone mentions it

4

Anonymous #1 5h

Do you understand how politics work? Have you studied how our justice system works? Have you seen it fail hundreds of thousands of times? We have some power but not enough to bring this kind of thing to light unless you want to hack and get the complete unredacted files. Money is power in this country

1

Anonymous #6 5h

There’s no evidence of anything. You are so stupid. The only reason is bring up Trump is because the only reason “the Files” are even talked about is because of Trump. You people are dumb as fuck!!!

0

Anonymous #6 5h

the problem is bigger than trump but if you don’t want to acknowledge that #5 than you are APART of the problem … looks like you are wanting to hide and protect yourself.. when maybe YOU 🤔 are involved in the loop 🔁 too! (:

1

Anonymous #5 5h

you don’t want rights looks like! 😉

1

Anonymous #5 5h

First off, the files are not only talked about because of trump. There has been support for a total release for years. And let me remind you that Trump ran on releasing the files, his supporters backed him on that notion. The fbi director Kash Patel, was put in place and was supposedly dead set on revealing the truth about the files. This administration has covered up and hid the files and tried to get them scrubbed. That is a clear motivation to cover up crimes.

2

Anonymous #5 5h

For god sakes they put millions of dollars to overthrow massie BECAUSE he was trying to expose the files

3

Anonymous #6 5h

At this point, I have to believe anything that says “Epstein Files” is trump hate or love or whatever the fuck else🫠. #5. Do you dream of electric sheep at night?

3

Anonymous OP 3h

Epstein files is single-handedly the largest most disgusting evil in human existence so far. It’s the largest scandal. I try to avoid being labeled ignorant but god damn do I wanna stop reading every time I dive a bit deeper. It’s a global example of the worst type of people and they all run your world. To say it’s trump hate is…to diminish how absolutely vile this is. But naturally…we conveniently forgot so we can keep our cushy lives where we sell our data and morals and principles to them.

10

Anonymous #1 2h

‼️🩷

1

Anonymous #5 2h

do you still feel “intelligent” 😝 where did you get your .. education ??? mmm a private school 🏫

2

Anonymous #1 2h

You’re a conspiracy theorist. You reference “files” but don’t say anything of substance. Clown ass bitch, no one believes your bullshit, wait till the midterms 👌🏻

0

Anonymous #2 2h

Do you feel “intelligent” ? Idk why you put that in quotes lol idiot

0

Anonymous #6 2h

Fuck massive he’s a loser lol shows how wrong you are, you liberals are fucked

0

Anonymous #6 2h

It’s all a hoax, dumbass. Watch yourself stop giving a fuck in 2 years whole Trump Golfs and chills at mar a lago. Fuck you, bitch

-1

Anonymous OP 2h

TDS TDS TDS TDS 😂

0

Anonymous #5 2h

What the hell man, why are you so aggressive. “Files” refers to the case as the common name has become “The Epstein Files” if you want specific information I can provide you with it. You are a textbook example of issue with today’s political climate. Calm down and have a discussion instead of getting your panties in a twist.

5

Anonymous #5 2h

Why is Massie a loser?

4

Anonymous #5 2h

What part is a hoax exactly? The rape of children? The millions of files that have yet to be released or unredacted?

0

Anonymous #5 2h

you are genuinely… just repeating back what we said to you GET FUCKING ORIGINAL

1

Anonymous #6 2h

What child was raped? You are stupid as fuck. Cite your specific source, you dumbass bitch.

0

Anonymous #5 2h

Okay, so you believe that there were no children that were raped by Epstein and his conspirators. Am I getting that right

2

Anonymous #5 2h

hi! i was raped as a child

1

Anonymous #2 2h

do you want to ask me about it! pls do!

1

Anonymous #5 2h

do you have kids do you want a family! better keep them safeeee and locked away with yourself 🩷

1

Anonymous #5 2h

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1180481/dl here’s a source

5

Anonymous #6 2h

yay! a link! pls learn to read! and stop reciting from your daddy or mommy! ‼️

1

Anonymous #2 2h

#5 your just a 🐕

1

Anonymous #5 2h

i bet you like to sniff your own family and touch siblings 2 SOUNDS like itttttttttttttttttttt

1

Anonymous #6 2h

And if you don’t want to go to the link here’s a picture of the factual information of the 2005 case

3

Anonymous #6 2h

If your stance is that no one else was involved we can move onto that. I hope this shows that it isn’t a ‘hoax’ and if you respond with “14 year olds aren’t children” you need to go to therapy.

6

Anonymous #6 2h

Keep in mind 6 that this is just the charges. It’s not a conviction. anyone can charge anyone with anything. And it’s also wildly curious that they want his property 👀…

5

Anonymous #1 2h

He was convicted. What are you referring to when you say ‘they want his property’.

3

Anonymous #6 2h

Are you talking about the fact that they ordered to forfeit the property he committed these horrible despicable acts on?

4

Anonymous #1 2h

*sorry I’ll correct myself; anyone can charge anyone on anything in an indictment as long as a grand jury thinks the charges hold some degree of merit. What that means is a bunch of people believe something happened or may have happened and are willing to investigate the issue

3

Anonymous #6 2h

Yeah that seemed like an odd ask.

4

Anonymous #1 1h

I’m confused what your stance is. Yes innocent until proven guilty. But Epstein was proven guilty.

5

Anonymous #6 1h

I’m saying you sent me an indictment. That’s just me saying “I think you’re a piece of shit”. The document itself is not factual. It would be more productive to post the Judgement of Conviction

5

Anonymous #1 1h

There is a section that is titled ‘Factual Information’ that is not up for opinion. He raped those girls. Youngest was 14. That is a child.

6

Anonymous #6 1h

You’re talking about the factual background but that’s not actually established fact. It’s the prosecutors version of what happened and fact they want to establish. Again I’m not saying he didn’t do it. He was convicted in 2008. Found guilty. He’s literal scum. I agree with you, I’m just saying the document you used to base your claim was not productive.

4

Anonymous #1 1h

If he was found guilty. If what was accused of was found guilty in court. How is this not a credible document. I’m curious on why you are saying that this is not credible

4

Anonymous #6 58m

I’m not. It’s a credible document if by credible you mean the prosecution believed he committed crimes in this document. I’m trying to show you that if in the future you did this with a case where a conviction hasn’t occurred yet this would be pointless. It still is fairly pointless compared to a judgement of conviction. Charges/indictments are not fact. They are claims. Just something to consider.

1