Not at all actually. Even if she wanted to have sex with them(which her lawyer made clear was not the case) she could have decided at any point that she wanted to stop, that’s her right. If she wanted to stop and they kept going(7 hours btw) it’s still rape. She didn’t consent to it end of discussion.

119

"turbo thot behavior" and she was drugged to the point of unconsciousness

100

literally go fuck yourself

57

quick tell me the definition of consent without googling. bet you can’t do that

50

Anonymous OP 1w

Don’t bother this sad fuck doesn’t actually want a discussion they just want reactions

34

Anonymous #8 1w

???

3

Anonymous #10 1w

No it doesn’t

6

Anonymous #9 1w

Really because she stated she voluntarily took drugs alcohol and consented to sex

-16

Anonymous #10 1w

When did she made this statement?

10

Anonymous #10 1w

She contented to a threesome and other sexual activities, not being passed out an fucked by other guys dipshit

36

Anonymous #9 1w

Official District Attorney Statement

13

Anonymous #10 1w

Drinking alcohol by choice and consenting to sex with 2 people doesn’t mean you consent to ketamine or sex with 7 people. Which it wasn’t. It was rape.

30

Anonymous #6 1w

hm idk maybe to the DA

-6

Anonymous #9 1w

She wasn’t passed out and literally admitted they all stopped once she said she was too tired and no longer wanted to engage

22

Anonymous #8 1w

It doesn’t matter if she said yes at the beginning. It also doesn’t matter if she said yes to 3 guys. If she said no and asked them to stop and they kept going, that’s rape. Consent can be revoked at any time. Like what about this isn’t clicking?

44

Anonymous #10 1w

Do you understand consent dumbass? It doesn’t matter if she consented to have sex and drugs in the beginning. If she had enough and asked them to stop but they kept going, that’s rape. Consent can be revoked at any time.

23

Anonymous #10 1w

I send when damnit

1

Anonymous OP 1w

After reading as much of the documentation I could get my eyes on…everyone raped everyone. Nobody was in the position to consent.

-7

Anonymous #8 1w

Where’d you find this?

1

Anonymous #10 1w

So she went to the police to report the crime of nothing? This don’t make sense.

26

Anonymous OP 1w

Ok and there’s no proof that’s what happened. In fact there’s more of her testimony that shows they did stop when she said she was tired and no longer wanted to engage

10

Anonymous #6 1w

2024

5

Anonymous #14 1w

the victim blaming in this comment section is crazy

27

Anonymous #5 1w

It’s not victim blaming

11

Anonymous #5 1w

Nobody victim blamed.

-7

Anonymous #1 1w

They shouldn’t but it’s a fucked up reality. It’s Murphy’s law, evil people exist all over the world and obviously it’s not her fault but nothing good was ever gonna come from doing drugs at a frat party, which just put her in a vulnerable position.

14

Anonymous #14 1w

Just shut the fuck up. She wasn’t doing it by herself you moron

2

Anonymous #14 1w

Yeah you did.

10

Anonymous OP 1w

How

8

Anonymous #14 1w

Because you suggested that a woman have some semblance of accountability

6

Anonymous #14 1w

I can explain! You are saying Jane Doe was idiot for doing "drugs at a frat house alone" (which isn't true she wasn't alone but for a sake of argument let say she was.) In a vacuum that is a stupid decision. However, the consequences to a stupid decision shouldn't ever be getting gang raped for 7 hours after being advertised like a free box of donuts...

8

Anonymous #5 1w

a regular consequence for a stupid decision like that is having a bad reaction to the drug and not a way to get help / care you need.

2

Anonymous #5 1w

Assuming she was gang raped. It hasn’t been proven.

10

Anonymous #13 1w

“Free pussy in alumni room” how is that not guilty???

24

Anonymous #10 1w

That’s what I know most likely she made that statement after the incident in 2024 because she felt there is no way people will take her case seriously or that she might be silenced and harassed by the fraternity that violated her if she spoke up

-2

Anonymous #16 1w

Saying free pussy is not an admission of rape. It could also be a sign of sexual promiscuity. Until the grand jury decides and there’s a trial potentially, there’s no way to know. It’s all based on assumption.

-5

Anonymous #13 1w

yeah, if you truly believe that then you just hate women or are stupid

-1

Anonymous #5 1w

Believe what? Don’t try to strawman me

1

Anonymous #13 1w

they didn't just say "free pussy" dumbass, they also said "you could just walk in and whip it out" and mentioned that someone literally did just that. they literally acted like human being was only there for their pleasure. you are sick and twisted if you genuinely don't see that

13

Anonymous #13 1w

YOU ARE WRONG. Please get that in your head

7

Anonymous #13 1w

go fuck yourself

2

Anonymous #5 1w

I’m not defending the guys because I think this whole situation is nasty. But those statements are not an admission of rape. One could also argue it is an admission that she is very sexually promiscuous. Nobody will know until a trial happens.

1

Anonymous #17 1w

Just saying that doesn’t make it true. All I’m saying is that their guilt has not been proven in a court of law.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Brilliant response. Do you not have any other argument?

-3

Anonymous #13 1w

It’s pointless to argue with someone like you so why would I

11

Anonymous #13 1w

You’re genuinely a lost cause.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No, I think you are. Presuming guilt without proper procedure. Low IQ thinking.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

You’re right it is pointless because you’re an emotionally charged moron who doesn’t understand how this process needs to legally play out.

7

Anonymous #13 1w

believe that she wasn't gang raped... im not trying to strawman you. if you have actually looked into the case and understand consent then its very clear that she was gang raped. its not something thats up for debate if you don't hate women. if you don't understand consent then you're just stupid

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Not you telling me I have a low IQ lol. Look in the mirror if you want to see someone with a low IQ.

-1

Anonymous #13 1w

how is "like you can walk in and whip it out" not an admission of rape?? at no where in the group chat did they said "with permission" or "ask first" they literally advertised it as if she was a giant pizza. i was in a sorority they wound have free food and drinks for us all the time. you actively inviting other people to come and eat/drink. they treated her the same way.

12

Anonymous #5 1w

This is such an intentionally dense way of thinking. A message alone is not proof of rape. A lawyer could easily argue that it was just vulgar language. Again, I’m not defending the man because I think that what they did was degenerate, but that is not concrete proof

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

Interesting how you left out the part where she was already intoxicated when she arrived at the frat house so she could not have consented to sex

15

Anonymous #18 1w

You can be intoxicated and still consent incapacitation and intoxication are two entirely different things

6

Anonymous #13 1w

She had 10 standard drinks before then. That is enough to impair judgment and nullify consent.

7

Anonymous #18 1w

Not according to what she described to the district attorney in 2024.

-2

Anonymous #8 1w

Oh you’re slow and disgusting

10

Anonymous #20 1w

if the men were the ones in danger then why didn't the other 57 members in the group chat say or do something when they their messages?

5

Anonymous #21 1w

November 2024 does not really help that case my dude but go on

-3

Anonymous #21 1w

Why would someone report it to police if everything was consensual? Idk maybe give it a thought.

3

Anonymous #20 1w

Oh shut the fuck up. You’re really showing who you are. You should be locked up too.

-1

Anonymous #6 1w

That’s when this happened. This is not a 2026 incident.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Why did she want to go back to the same frat and run it back a couple days later? Apparently she had fun.

7

Anonymous #5 1w

Well because they were in the group chat not at the location where everything occurred

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Make me shut up bitch. I dare you to try anything with me.

2

Anonymous #20 1w

Oh no I’m so scared 😱

0

Anonymous #20 1w

They could’ve literally called for help but ok

6

Anonymous OP 1w

You’re the one telling me to shut up so make me

1

Anonymous #8 1w

genuinely why is this getting downvoted

-1

Anonymous #18 1w

by that logic, two people who both take one shot each, then have sex have raped each other. Taking the drugs voluntarily and drinking the alcohol for the purpose of a stimulant fueled gangbang (which she was aware of and consented to whilst not incapacitated, the definition of rape), does not make her a subject of rape under new york law. Not to mention how her story changed from voluntarily taking the drugs in her initial police report to “i was drugged” in the lawsuit two years later.

-1

Anonymous #12 1w

yet that’s exactly what the report states

3

Anonymous #6 1w

Always an excuse

4

Anonymous #6 1w

bullshit

0

Anonymous #12 1w

Because she believed she was a victim but when detailing the events to the police they came to the conclusion that no crime occurred

-3

Anonymous #10 1w

Bitch shut up. If you actually read everything in the news you’d know the DA & campus police both lied about her original statements.

4

Anonymous OP 1w

where exactly? quote it

3

Anonymous #23 1w

Are you genuinely slow? She was already heavily intoxicated when she went to visit her “friend” at the frat party. He and his friends then gave her more drugs, to the point she was unconscious, and then raped her. So yeah, it does fucking matter.

4

Anonymous #21 1w

She said she wanted to smoke together again but with just him (not the like extra 6 billion men) and not do ketamine.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Maybe I’m just new to side chat - but aren’t you the one who originally posted “it doesn’t fucking matter?”

1

Anonymous #1 1w

A woman absolutely should be wary that an assault could occur while she’s intoxicated at a frat house.

1

Anonymous #23 1w

A drunk person having the capacity to be wary? Do you hear yourself 😭

-1

Anonymous #18 1w

Underage women also shouldn’t drink

1

Anonymous #24 4d

So true king

6