Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
If you want everyone to be obsessed with you, just develop an avoidant attachment style. If you want everyone to leave you tf alone/avoid you, just develop an anxious attachment style.
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

Calling people getting anxious from your inconsistency “being obsessed with you” is an absolutely diabolical level of self-flattery. Let’s not spread attachment theory misinformation just to make dysfunction sound desirable. It’s not the flex you think it is

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

So true cause whenever I’m talking to someone, all girls around me are suddenly all interested in me. Like WHAT? It’s like instantaneous.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Lmfao not what I meant. #1 got it. It's the avoidant air, the less you want for/try for social interactions/social bonds, the harder people follow you around/pursue you. And telling people something like 'I don't date' 'I don't really go out like that' 'Sorry I'm busy like all the time' 'No', etc, ppl seem to lock-in on you like it's a big challenge

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

In practice, people DO NOT leave avoidants alone 😭 It's not some poor victim being trapped in a game of push-pull that I'm talking about It's ppl being drawn in by what they can't have ig? The thrill of knowing there's no expectations?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

I totally get what you mean lol. You: Unavailable people can become more desirable because people want what they can’t have. Me: Sure, but attributing that entire social phenomenon to avoidant attachment and presenting avoidant attachment as a cheat code for making people obsessed with you is where you lose me.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

“People do not leave avoidants alone” or are they emotionally unavailable to begin with? Lol. When normal intimacy, vulnerability, or emotional expectations start feeling like a threat to someone’s independence, of course the other person can look unusually persistent from their perspective. There’s a difference between people being obsessed with you because you’re supposedly irresistible and people trying to establish a normal reciprocal connection with someone who keeps creating distance.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 16h

Well you're absolutely correct, I mean this post was kinda a joke, not a serious proclamation of a psychological theory 😭 It's just funny to me how the people that people who seem to have the least want for social connections seem to have the most options Avoidant attachment is horrible and one shouldn't strive for it, of course. But it does end up being kind of a cheat code, the harder you try to keep people away, the harder they try to reject that

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

From a COMPLETELY non-scientific, non-scholarly perspective. Just from my personal experience and that of other avoidants I know. Anxious attachments do tend to sniff avoidants out in a heartbeat, and they in particular pretty aggressively hunt us. Some of them continue until we can allow them to deepen their victim complexes.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

I think you might be projecting a little here lol. “Anxious attachers aggressively hunt us” makes them sound like predators and avoidants like passive victims. Anxious attachers can absolutely engage in unhealthy pursuit, but avoidants can also contribute to that dynamic through inconsistency, withdrawal, mixed signals, etc. And calling someone’s hurt a “victim complex” when avoidant behavior has genuinely impacted them is… interesting. (1/2)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

A dysfunctional attachment cycle can involve both people. It’s not anxious predator vs avoidant prey. (2/2)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

I agree there’s a pattern where emotional unavailability can make some people pursue harder. That was never my disagreement. I just dislike framing it as avoidants having some “cheat code” that makes people obsessed with them, when sometimes that pursuit is an attachment system being activated by inconsistency, uncertainty, or intermittent reinforcement. That’s why I said it’s not the flex you think it is lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12h

Yes, again, you're absolutely correct from a clinical/psychological (evidence/factual based) perspective. But anxious attachments seem to be very babied while avoidants are HARDCORE demonized. While they're actually BOTH bad and should be worked through ASAP. Just like bpd and npd. I used to have an anxious attachment style, btw. It's just often seen as avoidant=predator, anxious=poor prey. That is NOT always true.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12h

I've been stalked and whatnot a few too many times by anxious-attachment styles to have much sympathy And I have way too much personal shame and self-hatred from back when I was an anxious to have much sympathy However, dating a dismissive avoidant for 3 years was the most excruciating shit EVER. So I also have minimal sympathy for dismissive avoidants who actively date and mess with people even on the platonic end!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12h

At the end of the day, in practice, I'm still going to stay in the camp of yes, people do not leave avoidants alone though. There are countless reasons and mechanisms behind that varying from person to person ofc. But I'm just trying to leave everyone alone and work on myself, and people make that very hard 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12h

I agree that anxious attachment shouldn’t be babied either, and crossing someone’s boundaries is unacceptable regardless of attachment style. I think we just ended up talking about something slightly different from my original point. I wasn’t arguing that anxious = victim and avoidant = villain. (1/2)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12h

I was pushing back on the idea that people becoming ‘obsessed’ with avoidants is somehow an inherent avoidant trait, because that framing can romanticize an unhealthy dynamic. Neither side gets a free pass (2/2)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12h

Being activated or attached does not automatically equal being obsessed. They can overlap, but framing every intense response as “obsession” gives the avoidant a little too much credit and the dynamic itself not nearly enough

upvote 1 downvote