Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
If you need to ask ChatGPT if you are in the right after doing something awful, I feel sorry for you and anyone in your life
upvote 906 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

That’s what Reddit is for

upvote 142 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

It’s not a need but ChatGPT is extremely neutral and non biased. It’ll give you the real spill. Especially for people who are delusional and always think they’re right

upvote 65 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 20h

Better to have the self awareness to question whether or not you are right than to just assume you were.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

allow people to grow

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 20h

Ngl I have done something similar to this once or twice. I’d definitely recommend putting it in as a question (like an assignment question, making fake names n such), and it’s less biased, if at all. It actually looks at what the ‘characters’ are doing in my experience. However, with that being said, ik it’s bad to do, but man it’s great for sudden intense anxiety 😭😭

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

ChatGPT is always right

upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 21h

it isn’t, chat GPT is more likely to agree with you to keep you engaged on the platform. it would be more useful to you to talk to friends or people you don’t know online about it. there r nuances that real people have through experiences that a chat bot can’t replicate

upvote 204 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 21h

Esp as someone who can fall into delusions/episodes occasionally (which of course makes oneself paranoid they are currently in one), if you word the situation properly it will give a genuinely neutral and outside perspective

upvote 41 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 21h
post
upvote 86 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 20h

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec8352

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 20h

I appreciate the source! I don’t use it very frequently as of now but definitely have in the past, it certainly is a slippery slope. It’s a price I am willing to occasionally pay to get better understanding of my situation.

upvote -9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 20h

People on anonymous platforms like this, Reddit, Tumblr, etc will be far more helpful, and they won’t have the same environmental impacts. Hell, you can just consult me and I’ll tell you for free. IMO, nothing is worth fueling the data centers that are taking over the drinking water near my house.

upvote 56 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 19h

Except when it’s mostly incorrect.

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 18h

This is why when you talk to ChatGPT to see if you’re in the right, you write as if you were the other person and see if ChatGPT says you’re in the wrong…. This is what I do and I hope this is what others do.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 18h

If you haven’t noticed how frequently it makes mistakes you must be using it as an authoritative source rather than a suggestion to be fact-checked

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 18h

Using character names for people involved in an ethical situation you’re unsure about is a good idea, but something to note is that there is a bit of randomness. You can prompt it the same thing and it’ll come to different conclusions. E.g. I could say “grade my essay using this rubric” and the result could be different if I prompt it multiple times.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 18h

ChatGPT is never right* there fixed it for you

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

i use chatgpt as a therapist sometimes and i agree with this. it HAS pointed out to me when i might actually being the wrong before, which is useful.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 18h

Your refusal to talk to real people, online (AITA, YikYak, Reddit, Tumblr, Discord, etc) or irl (friends, family, coworkers, peers, barista at the coffee shop), in favor of a glorified text generator has caused my tap water to be brown.

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 18h

oml no one can think for themselves anymore. you don't learn unless you figure it out yourself

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 16h

i have a lack of people in my life to confide in, and its hard to give unbiased details online and get unbiased reasoning. everyone has bias. and everyone talking about how chatgpt uses water and omg its taking away our warer are horribly misinformed because every platform u listed ALSO uses water. our devices use water. im sorry but ur tap is brown for otherly reasons.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 15h

https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption

post
upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 15h

I agree, nothing will ever be unbiased. There also will always be bias in tech because it is created by people. It is trained on what people have created (by stealing copyrighted works, mind you). ChatGPT is no less biased than your local coffee shop barista, and it can’t even make food to snack on as you confide in them at the bar. Do not use your lack of social skills as an excuse to literally shrink your brain.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 15h

https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/land-lines-magazine/articles/land-water-impacts-data-centers/ More data on electricity usage as well^ None of this was as much of an issue when Social Media debuted.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #15 15h

No for sure, the mental disillusions are more what i’m talking about, could’ve led to dangerous things without access to that immediate observer

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 14h

There’s a woman who is literally dating an AI that convinced her to tattoo herself out of “possession” to own her body. AI is biased, it just learned it from somewhere else.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9h

Cap

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 8h

ChatGPT must have typed this for you

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7h

Point me in the direction of a therapist who’s gonna help me understand myself at this depth or greater and I’ll give up the bucket of bolts. Otherwise I’m going to keep questioning and challenging myself with the help of this wonderful tool

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #20 6h

People that claim those who use ai are not “free thinkers” are actually just telling on themselves that they don’t use ai properly or don’t have the intellect to do so because you can absolutely find gpt pushing back on some of my unhealthy habits. You just have to exhibit things like vulnerability, transparency, and articulate your problems in a way that allows it to see the full picture. It will push back. It will not always agree with you. Gpt has ripped into me for more than one thing.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6h

Amen

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 17m

as mentioned before, chatgpt is likely your agree with whoever is giving the prompt, especially the more you use it. it has literally encouraged people to kill themselves or others; it can technically be considered unbiased in some ways, but it is far from reliable

upvote 1 downvote